On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:23:39 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:05:10 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:18:44 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:05:28 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:shvrd518d8rk42fg95tvagh5tavhkd99rd@4ax .com...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT), wf3h

wrote:

On Oct 20, 1:37 pm, jps wrote:


So much for Judges being above politics.

our PA judges are the best money can buy!

That woman is a piece of work. What makes her think she can make
public statements about controlling redistricting through judges?

How the hell did she get on the bench in the first place? I know
judges are human but this woman exhibits a complete lack of
discretion.

Sounds like the latest appointment to the US Supreme Court. Same
biased
statements.

That's an example of your lack of discernment, not Sotomayor's lack of
discretion.

Discerment my ass. They are both signs of bias. You just like
Sotomeyer
as
she is a "D".

I'm hoping she's not a corporatist like most others who inhabit the 3
branches of government.

You like Sotomeyers bias but dislike the others bias, so all is well.
Makes
sense, not.

You're putting words in my mouth. I didn't support Sotomajor other
than to refute the bull**** charges that were being floated by minor
minds like yours.

I happen to agree that a Latina woman is likely to have broader set of
experiences than a white man of the same age and bring strengths
through that experience that a white man would never understand.

I know what it's like to be a white male. We've got it easy.

You don't know ****.

I surely do know ****. I'm writing to him presently.

It's you that doesn't know **** you old white turkey.