"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 20, 1:37 pm, jps wrote:


So much for Judges being above politics.

our PA judges are the best money can buy!

That woman is a piece of work. What makes her think she can make
public statements about controlling redistricting through judges?

How the hell did she get on the bench in the first place? I know
judges are human but this woman exhibits a complete lack of
discretion.

Sounds like the latest appointment to the US Supreme Court. Same biased
statements.

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:05:28 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 20, 1:37 pm, jps wrote:


So much for Judges being above politics.

our PA judges are the best money can buy!

That woman is a piece of work. What makes her think she can make
public statements about controlling redistricting through judges?

How the hell did she get on the bench in the first place? I know
judges are human but this woman exhibits a complete lack of
discretion.

Sounds like the latest appointment to the US Supreme Court. Same biased
statements.

That's an example of your lack of discernment, not Sotomayor's lack of
discretion.

In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 20, 1:37 pm, jps wrote:


So much for Judges being above politics.

our PA judges are the best money can buy!

That woman is a piece of work. What makes her think she can make
public statements about controlling redistricting through judges?

How the hell did she get on the bench in the first place? I know
judges are human but this woman exhibits a complete lack of
discretion.

Sounds like the latest appointment to the US Supreme Court. Same biased
statements.

The difference is racism is endorsed by the DNC, even rewarded..