|
Obama and Hitler
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 10/23/09 4:49 PM, Bill McKee wrote: "H the wrote in message ... On 10/23/09 3:13 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:25:55 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. And you've had so many years on the planet and governed millions in that time, taking into account all factors, contingencies and predictions and you'd do a better job. It's damned funny that I never heard you bitch so succinctly during Bush's presidency. Come on Bill, you haven't been a Dem in decades. Isn't time to stop fooling yourself? Actually, I think it is BiliousBill who used to be a Democrat...unless he and McKee underwent a vulcan mind meld. McKee always "impressed" me as one of the "I've got mine, so screw everyone else" Repubs. And you impress me as **** the rest of you, I want yours. When was the last time you helped a charity by working for them and not expecting a pay check? I have no interest in "yours." Yes you do. You are a gimmie person. |
Obama and Hitler
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. |
Obama and Hitler
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Wow. You are such a smart person! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama and Hitler
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Wow. You are such a smart person! Hey Bill. This coming from the smart and pretty, outspoken, slightly overweight, Iclandic goddess with mousy brown hair down to her shoulders, you should be flattered. |
Obama and Hitler
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:52:01 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message om... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Wow. You are such a smart person! Finally said something truthful. lol lol |
Obama and Hitler
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... *Is a test* of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Ah ha! Giving yourself away Swill... re "Is a test" |
Obama and Hitler
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Wow. You are such a smart person! Hey Bill. This coming from the smart and pretty, outspoken, slightly overweight, Iclandic goddess with mousy brown hair down to her shoulders, you should be flattered. Funny and fairly accurate except about the "slightly overweight" and "mousy brown hair" goddess. I'm not overweight and my hair is black (well, mostly). -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama and Hitler
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since LBJ escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind. Just like the Crusade we are on now, That war was not going to be won. Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in either place. I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor can the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain ambushes. This is a war of necessity. It is necessary that we *win* this war. So saith the messiah. What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*? This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick. I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I hope so. What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in charge. -- Nom=de=Plume There is no problem with his changing his mind. Unless it is because a CNN poll says he should change his stance. We did not hire him to be an arbitrator of popularity. He needs to learn the "Buck Stops Here" part of the Presidency. I agree. What makes you think he's being an arbiter of popularity? -- Nom=de=Plume He is being like Clinton. Following the polls. CNN, etc poll says people prefer this, then O seems to follow along. Clinton should have made the hard decisions instead of the popular decisions and he would have gone in to the books as one of the great Presidents. And, you know this because? Which polls do you think he's following? Perhaps you're talking about the "public option" that 70ish % of the population supports? Yup, he's following the polls! Which hard decisions didn't Clinton make? Ummm... let's see.. Bosnia, Somalia, gay in the military, a balanced budget, a surplus.... During his worst nightmare aka Monica he retained high public support. I guess he was just following the polls. -- Nom=de=Plume He did not leave a surplus! The National debt did not go down. The dot.com bubble just poured more money in to the coffers than they could spend right away. Lots of that money was committed to future spending, which is hurting us now. Same thing with California. So much extra cash that the budget has doubled in the last 8 years before now, and lots of that money was committed as if the gobs of extra money was a permanent source. Bosnia was and is a disaster. Still an ongoing disaster, and was a European problem. Did not concern us. Somalia. He refused the heavy tanks, etc that were requested. Black Hawk down was a disaster because of no heavy armor. Why didn't Clinton authorize gays in the military, instead of pushing under the rug? Man up Clinton. Make a ruling. Just like Truman ruled the military was desegregated. Make the ruling. As to gays destroying the military. Seems to work ok in the UK and some other European countries. Clinton was extremely lucky on the financial front. It was already starting to crash, before the election. And Gore accelerated the meltdown with his election claims. Clinton should have fired Greenspan or at least had looked at the overheated market. But Clintons choice of advisors was lacking a lot of knowledge. Barrack is listening to some polls on the healthcare. Those who think they should have free healthcare. Same ones who thought he was going to pay their mortgage and put gas in the tank. Too many problems just now to tackle healthcare. Man Up. Tell the country we need health care, and we will take a year or two and get it correct. Not a 1000 page bill no one is allowed to read, or have 15 minutes to look at it and vote. Direct the justice Department to prosecute any body who was in charge of Naked Shorts and uncovered short sales on Wall Street, and force them to return all profits and 10x punitive damages. Including Paulson's buddies. Fire the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac officials, not give them a $2 mega buck signing bonus. He is listening the polls (slanted polls) and doing leadership that way. He is not stupid, he is also not an Einstein, but he is naive as hell. You might want to trim your rants or at least break them up into intelligible paragraphs. Too much jumble for me to even try to respond to without wasting lots of time. Believe what you want. It's a free country (expecting another rant any second.....). He presented you with a lot of food for thought and you complain that he didn't make a neat little finger sandwich out of it. If I were him I'd let you go hungry rather than trying to spoon feed you. Not really. Mostly just rants about Clinton, intermixed with a bunch of nonsense. Why don't you feed yourself... seems like you need some intellectual nutrients. -- Nom=de=Plume Can not help it if you are reading comprehension challenged. Can not help it if you don't know how to write... perhaps take a writing class at a local JC. -- Nom=de=Plume Is a test of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Wow. You are such a smart person! -- Nom=de=Plume Yes I am. |
Obama and Hitler
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... *Is a test* of your reading comprehension. Maybe you should take a class at the local JC. Ah ha! Giving yourself away Swill... re "Is a test" You could not pass a test. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com