John H. wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"KotP-A" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly
overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the
hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of
Barney Frank?

Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael
Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is
puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care
to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be
offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as
much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation.
Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an
NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game,
should I choose.

Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat
sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him.
Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done!
These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of
political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin
foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're
like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean.

As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised
I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :)

I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck...
I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that
track.

I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a
team.
I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would
block
it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements.
Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone
say
it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally
divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to
explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently.
lol

I think you don't know much about women.

Not your variety, that's for damn sure.

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:15:19 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:49:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:09:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:02:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:05 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote:


These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of
political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin
foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're
like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean.

Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about
Chryco cars, never went after one.
Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart
Swinger. It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin.
What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?"
If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some
delicacy. I'm pretty sensitive.

--Vic

There's no double entendre intended, Vic. It was more of a metaphor.
The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph
Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. Looked something like this,
but was orange with with racing strips;

http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...LER %20N9.jpg

If that was the greatest ride in the world! It was like riding right
above the pavement.

You sporting a Hummer these days?

Ford F150.

Standard Republican issue.

And the standard Democrat issue is the SUV - Expedition, Hummer 2,
Suburban...

Not a single person I know drives any of those vehicles. They're gas
pigs. The NW isn't into ostentatious or displays. At least not until
you get out of town where the idiots live side-by-side with the
educated.

I don't know a single Democrat who'd be caught dead in a Hummer.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I think you don't know much about women.

I suspect you don't either.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female.

Not by a long shot.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:31 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:12:41 -0500, wrote:


These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of
political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin
foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're
like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean.

As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised
I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :)

Are you certain you did? Looks like another entry from the Ponderosa.

Double standard nothing. I'm all for free speech until the free
speech details how we should curtail the civil rights or equal
protection of all.

That's why Nazi's have a difficult time getting permission to parade.

Rush is a step backwards in the evolution of civil society in America.
He's welcome to join any white-only club he desires with my blessing.
When it comes to participating in a sport that creates opportunity for
and can highlight african american men in a positive way, he's a
completely inappropriate partner.

You need only to have heard his comment about the NFL being crips and
bloods without weapons.

Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied
about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps
quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.")


**** him in his ass with your dick. And thanks for offering.
("I'm not doing any foaming.")

What a laugh!

What's fabricated is your loyalty to this country.

The likes of you would turn it into China and probably will.

You defending Limbaugh is a joke. I'd offer to **** him with your
dick but I'm absolutely certain it hasn't worked in years.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I think you don't know much about women.

I suspect you don't either.

Only thing Harry knows about women is they are to be degraded and
attacked. He also thinks children are just silent little sex toys...
After all, the guy wouldn't dare attack a man, he knows he would get his
lights punched out...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female.

Not by a long shot.

GUYS, IT'S HARRY!!!! DON'T YOU GET IT???

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:32:54 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/15/09 8:31 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A
wrote:

Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied
about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps
quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.")

Self-admitted - he did say it.

"But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen
to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal.
I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to
change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it
was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look
racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a
different term."

It's easy to back-peddle after you've said something damaging. I
don't doubt he says things for effect and, in certain circumstances,
it may have been the result of poorly chosen words.

However, Rush's stock in trade are the fabrications he spins to
support his racist following.

If the price of stoking these people to make all that money he
accumulates, don't expect the sane to forgive him when he tries to buy
into polite society.

It's really saying something that Rush's money isn't welcome among a
bunch of ego-maniacal NFL owners.

I'm sure it was similar for the rich slave traders who tried to buy
their way into polite society.

And I'm not foaming when I say, **** him in the ass with your dick.

I bet he'd love it.

On 10/15/09 3:59 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I think you don't know much about women.

I suspect you don't either.

Only thing Harry knows about women is they are to be degraded and
attacked. He also thinks children are just silent little sex toys...
After all, the guy wouldn't dare attack a man, he knows he would get his
lights punched out...


Scott Ingersoll, our our Little Caesar, emphasis on little.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female.

Not by a long shot.

You sly fox. What you got up your sleeve? Does it have something to do
with www.nomdeplumeonline.com