On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic

I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.

hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'

So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.

Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...

It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.


Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties... clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and not a
righty.



You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic

I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.

hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'

So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.

Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...

It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.


Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.



You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on
the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes
the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that
order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here
filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't
hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.


I probably would claim to be dizzy sometimes (like a couple of weeks ago
when sailing), but I'm not ditzy. I don't want to be anyone's "heartthrob"
and I don't need anyone to defend me.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:47:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on
the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes
the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that
order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here
filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't
hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.


I probably would claim to be dizzy sometimes (like a couple of weeks ago
when sailing), but I'm not ditzy. I don't want to be anyone's "heartthrob"
and I don't need anyone to defend me.

'Tis not a question of 'need'. 'Tis a question of chivalry.

And, from my perspective, you need all you can get.

So hush. Your desires have no bearing on Harry's heartthrob choices.

Not ditzy? You should be on this end of your conversations!

John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:47:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on
the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes
the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that
order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here
filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't
hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.
Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.

You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.

Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."
She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.

I probably would claim to be dizzy sometimes (like a couple of weeks ago
when sailing), but I'm not ditzy. I don't want to be anyone's "heartthrob"
and I don't need anyone to defend me.

'Tis not a question of 'need'. 'Tis a question of chivalry.

And, from my perspective, you need all you can get.

So hush. Your desires have no bearing on Harry's heartthrob choices.

Not ditzy? You should be on this end of your conversations!

She's just about the right age for Harry. He's about due for a new model
anyway. He's pretty much worked the other one to the bone.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:47:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead
of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents
have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on
the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it
was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should
be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't
been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes
the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that
order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here
filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't
hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart
and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.


I probably would claim to be dizzy sometimes (like a couple of weeks ago
when sailing), but I'm not ditzy. I don't want to be anyone's "heartthrob"
and I don't need anyone to defend me.

'Tis not a question of 'need'. 'Tis a question of chivalry.

And, from my perspective, you need all you can get.

So hush. Your desires have no bearing on Harry's heartthrob choices.

Not ditzy? You should be on this end of your conversations!


Don't tell me to be quiet. You aren't qualifed. I wouldn't mind some
chivalry from you. So far, that's not what I've received.

--
Nom=de=Plume