H the K wrote:

The three morons... Scott Ingersoll, John Herring, and Bilious Bill.

An insightful post from a "professional" writer in a boating group!

Nice work, WAFA!

"John H Rant" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:37:03 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world
was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic

I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be proud
that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been case of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.




I love logic. Try reading what I posted again. Are you or are you not
proud
that the world thinks better of us? If so, then what diff does it make
who
got what award. If not, why not?

What?

Tom's wrong. That can *only* be a female.


Thank you I think... lol


--
Nom=de=Plume

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:28:00 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I love logic. Try reading what I posted again. Are you or are you not
proud that the world thinks better of us? If so, then what diff does it
make who got what award. If not, why not?

Be kind, you are talking to a dying dinosaur. The white male, the base
of the GOP, once ruled this land, but no longer. The demographics are
clear. If it doesn't change, the GOP is dead. Just look at some of the
results of the 2006 Congressional Elections.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1891803/posts

The GOP can survive, but only if it becomes more inclusive, a doubtful
proposition.

http://racism-politics.suite101.com/article.cfm/
reviving_the_republican_party


Ah.... yes, they're nearly extinct.. lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:



Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the world
was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.

I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic


I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be proud
that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been case of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.


You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

Makes sense if you remember Harry only love Harry.. Let's put it this
way, if you ignore Harry, you should ignore all of his sock puppets,
even the new one...


That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.




You and a couple of others really seem obsessed with Harry. I think you need
to get past it, but it's up to you of course!

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:44:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:42:38 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Chinese Human Rights Activist Hu Jia - imprisoned for campaigning for
human rights in the PRC, not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.
Wei Jingsheng, who spent 17 years in Chinese prisons for urging
reforms of China's communist system. -- not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama. (Not to mention the symbolic value of awarding a
Chinese dissident on the 20th Anniversary of the Tianenmen Square
Massacre.)

Greg Mortenson, founder of the Central Asia Institute has built nearly
80 schools, especially for girls, in remote areas of northern Pakistan
and Afghanistan over the past 15 years - not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama.

Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad, a philosophy professor in Jordan who risks
his life by advocating interfaith dialogue between Jews and Muslims,
also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Afghan human rights activist Sima Samar. She currently leads the
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and serves as the U.N.
special envoy to Darfur and is apparently also not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama - he's worthy of the Peace Prize for doing
nothing.

Good points. Too bad they made the Peace prize a joke.

--Vic


Why? Because it's not completely unusual for the prize to be awarded to
promote change...

Never saw that before.

Because our "new" friend Nom de Harry just made it up... Does that
surprise you?


I'm not Harry's friend... hardly know him. Sorry.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic

I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.

hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'

So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.

Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...

It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.


Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties... clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and not a
righty.



You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic

I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.

hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'

So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.

Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...

It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.


Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.



You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 8:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the wrote in message
...
On 10/11/09 10:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:46 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:15:38 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:58:33 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Vic wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:45:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Look at the wiki page about the Nobel Peace prize.

Ok, I looked. Obama doesn't belong on the list.
My opinion.
Seems the committee is working on "hope" criteria instead of
established work as in the past.
Maybe he'll justify it in the end, but the "rules" have
certainly
changed.
BTW, John Paul II, the Polish Pope, should be on that list.
He exuded peace and love, and spread it where ever he went.

You're right he might or might not, but most presidents have
far-reaching
impact. GWB is an example. Not for good, but his impact on
the
world was
large.

I don't think you're a bad person. If I implied that, it was
unintentional.
I was just kidding. I know I'm not a bad person. Mostly.

--Vic
I don't know if he deserved it or not. He got it. We should be
proud that
the Nobel committee thinks so highly of him. That hasn't been
case
of
recent presidents.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe it was really the NoBalls award.

You gotta love her logic.

"We should all be proud of nomdeplum because Harry thinks shes
the
cat's meow."

That would be a worthy idea except that Harry's 'blessing' now
carries
about as much weight as that of the Nobel Committee.
Got news for you - she's not a she.
hesheit's got the logic often used by 'she's'
So does Jim Hertvik but I'm not positive yet that she is he. I'm
waiting
for hesheit to explode. That'll give us better insight into the
personality. My candidates are hertvik, jps, and gould in that
order.
Its Harry... Got tired of literally everyone but three here
filtering
him...
It's hard to decide whether Scott Ingersoll is a cretin or a moron.

Sorry, ****-for-brains, but it's not me. And it certainly isn't
hertvik,
since he was a republican conservative.

Again, I think I should put out a blanket apology to the righties...
clearly
they are very upset with me... not sure why, beyond that I'm smart and
not a
righty.


You don't drink their hemlock-laced koolaid.


Socrates meets Jim Jones... lol

Oh sweetie. Don't be so modest. Didn't you say "I feel pretty, Oh, so
pretty, I feel pretty, and witty and gay, ... I feel fizzy and funny and
fine, And so pretty."

She already said she was pretty...and smart...and dizzy (or was it
ditzy).

And...she's Harry's heartthrob, so leave her in peace or Harry will
call you a name.

Heck, he might even come up with an *original* name.


I probably would claim to be dizzy sometimes (like a couple of weeks ago
when sailing), but I'm not ditzy. I don't want to be anyone's "heartthrob"
and I don't need anyone to defend me.

--
Nom=de=Plume