"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:09:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
. ..

No, but this guy Wilson clearly has a problem with blacks.

He has a problem with liars. Just because they may be black doesn't
make him a racist for pointing out the fact.
--

John H
50% white and 50% other ingredients.

So you think he looks white? Do you think anyone else in the world thinks
he
looks white?

If the man wants to lie and call himself black just so he can use the
race
card, thats his choice.

And, he used the race card when?

He has been using the race card from the gitgo. How the hell do you
think he got elected? It sure as hell wasn't from his experience. He
is behind every 'racist' attack, including Carters, that's been made.
He is doing a good job of 'pretending' to be above the fray, but trust
me - he's right there in the huddle making the calls.

Please show us once instance of Obama making race an issue during his
election.

He was elected by a majority of the people. Get over it.

He seems to be doing a pretty good job so far. I'm still waiting for you
to
agree that Wilson is a known racist and liar. I gave you an example of him
lying, and it looks like his slamming of Thurman's daughter pretty much
covers the racist part. But, keep deliberately misspelling his name if you
think that shows some honesty, judgement, arrogance, etc., on your part.
It
does show an agenda on your part, however.

Who or what Wilson is has no bearing. He simply identified a liar. Why
you use this in a discussion with Jim is beyond rationale.

As I said, claiming that a know liar has the same level of credibility as
the president isn't a "reasonable" argument. Wilson showed himself to be
both a liar and a racist. That pretty much puts him in the David Duke
category.


--
Nom=de=Plume