|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On 9/25/09 2:14 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:09:40 -0400, H the K wrote: snipped for Harry's own good You're a young writer, perhaps not in years. "He" reminds me of some of the freshmen I encountered when I taught bonehead English. There were always a couple of overwrought, purple prose wannabe writers among the students I taught in every class. If they were particularly obnoxious in class, I would slash and burn my way through their homework with a red pen. Harry, that reminds of me of my first year in college in comp class. I had submitted my first writing assignment, and a short time later the professor of the class came into the book store by the student union, having seen me in there, to commend me on my writing and the quality of the essay. I was surprised by that, of course. He said that I was far ahead of most other freshmen that he usually had in his class. He was equally surprised when he learned that I had little desire to be a writer. I went into engineering. Silly me. And now you sell insurance? Even professors can be buffoons, you know. Most who consider themselves right-of-center have little regard for the liberal arts so I haven't a clue why you'd think his commendation held any value. "Comp class" was the sort of official name of the "Bonehead English" classes I taught. "English composition 101." It sure was hell was *not* usually taught by "professors," but, rather, by lowly T.A.'s, or teaching assistants. That's what I was, a master's student in English trying to earn a few bucks to help defray my university costs. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:14:30 -0700, jps wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:09:40 -0400, H the K wrote: snipped for Harry's own good You're a young writer, perhaps not in years. "He" reminds me of some of the freshmen I encountered when I taught bonehead English. There were always a couple of overwrought, purple prose wannabe writers among the students I taught in every class. If they were particularly obnoxious in class, I would slash and burn my way through their homework with a red pen. Harry, that reminds of me of my first year in college in comp class. I had submitted my first writing assignment, and a short time later the professor of the class came into the book store by the student union, having seen me in there, to commend me on my writing and the quality of the essay. I was surprised by that, of course. He said that I was far ahead of most other freshmen that he usually had in his class. He was equally surprised when he learned that I had little desire to be a writer. I went into engineering. Silly me. And now you sell insurance? Even professors can be buffoons, you know. Most who consider themselves right-of-center have little regard for the liberal arts so I haven't a clue why you'd think his commendation held any value. Contrary to your claim, you must be having difficulty with my "ponderosities." Apparently, I didn't think his commendation held any value. And, yes, I sell insurance, among other things. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:22:26 -0700, jps wrote:
snipped for brevity Interesting. You would express an opinion of the writing style of someone who doesn't aspire to be a 'writer' rather than examine the error of your own statement. I suppose that's understandable, and it stands as a tested tatic. It certainly can't be for being unable to follow the course of the conversation, as you "haven't any trouble understanding ponderosities." Is there any reason that you expect to a more belletristic style of me? Rather than giving it lift, your verbosity adds no value to the communication. You apply drag to any spirit your communication may have carried with ponderous mouthfuls of lead-like verbiage. And that's well demonstrated in your unwillingness to end this communication. Enjoy. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
wrote There are support groups that help with comprehending "ponderous scribbling," if that will help at all. I do not need to ask how it is you know of these groups. Steve |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:40:59 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:14:30 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:09:40 -0400, H the K wrote: snipped for Harry's own good You're a young writer, perhaps not in years. "He" reminds me of some of the freshmen I encountered when I taught bonehead English. There were always a couple of overwrought, purple prose wannabe writers among the students I taught in every class. If they were particularly obnoxious in class, I would slash and burn my way through their homework with a red pen. Harry, that reminds of me of my first year in college in comp class. I had submitted my first writing assignment, and a short time later the professor of the class came into the book store by the student union, having seen me in there, to commend me on my writing and the quality of the essay. I was surprised by that, of course. He said that I was far ahead of most other freshmen that he usually had in his class. He was equally surprised when he learned that I had little desire to be a writer. I went into engineering. Silly me. And now you sell insurance? Even professors can be buffoons, you know. Most who consider themselves right-of-center have little regard for the liberal arts so I haven't a clue why you'd think his commendation held any value. Contrary to your claim, you must be having difficulty with my "ponderosities." Apparently, I didn't think his commendation held any value. And, yes, I sell insurance, among other things. Do you engineer insurance sales? |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On 9/25/09 3:50 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Florida Jim is one of ranking assholes of rec.boats, a boatless, jealous, cantankerous old fart who hasn't had a decent job since being mustered out of the Vietnam era navy. He's also a coward. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Sep 25, 3:50*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. *He/she is prolific though. *I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word.. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. *If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Who is this Bob fella. No sirre Bob. Us conservatives are the reasonable ones. You loons that fawn over liers, cheats, and thieves are the crazy ones. Krausie and company which includes you are beating a dead horse over all this political and economic nonsense. You cant change nuttin by bawling and blustering about it here. Go join some political action group or do something useful with your life instead of boring us to tears. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Who is this Bob fella. No sirre Bob. Us conservatives are the reasonable ones. You loons that fawn over liers, cheats, and thieves are the crazy ones. Krausie and company which includes you are beating a dead horse over all this political and economic nonsense. You cant change nuttin by bawling and blustering about it here. Go join some political action group or do something useful with your life instead of boring us to tears. Who's "Sweetie"? No such person here. Go yourself. You don't get to tell me what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Sep 25, 5:22*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message . .. nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive. Have a good weekend! |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Jim" wrote in message . .. nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 25, 5:22 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message . .. nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive. Have a good weekend! Hmmm... I don't disparage those who have a different political philosophy. You too! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message .. . nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 9:10 AM, JustWait wrote: Well, Harry, the second biggest liar in the group said he owned a So...is your daddy in the ground yet? When do you start grieving? Karen should read this thread. She may be in danger with this ****ing loser. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 11:33 AM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:13:10 -0400, H the K wrote: On 9/25/09 11:08 AM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:50:45 -0400, H the K wrote: temporarily snipped The wind blew, the crap flew, and all of it stuck to you. You've been punked. This from a man who makes comments like this?: So...is your daddy in the ground yet? When do you start grieving? Why am I unconcerned? Your concern concerns me not. The funny thing is that you fell for the other poster's tale, hook, line, and stinker. Then you should be able to evidentially reveal the other poster's identity. The "other poster," to whom you refer, is in my bozo bin, which is where he resided in most of his other iterations here. What you think I "should" do and what *I* decide I will do only coincide when *I* decide they do. Your concern for JustHate's feelings also are humorous, as is his lack of grief for his recently departed father. Do you ever get anything straight? I didn't express concerns for JustHate's feelings in any way whatsoever. I expressed a warranted loathing for your general lack of civility and decorum. There are some things that don't need to be uttered, and you utter them anyway, virtually in bad taste in every instance. It's a demonstrable lack of self-control, a form of verbal incontence. So there you have it. That's my cathartic moment, and I did it without any of the vile acrimony and emotive bilge that defines your character. In my opinion, JustHate is such a sleaze there simply is no excuse to treat him as if he were something else. The hardest work he does is to remain unemployable and suck down taxpayer benefits while he plays right-wing stooge. **** him. Serious narcissism! |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 12:06 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:39:37 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:15:47 -0400, H the K wrote: Here we ****ing go ....AGAIN. ****head Loogy, and Herring will jump ALL over this...watch. It's gotta be one of them, bringing up the Zimmerman thing. Don't forget ****-on-a-stick Reggie. :) Nope, none of the above. Tom. A right-wing asshole by any other name still smells like ****. Typical... |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 12:55 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:35:13 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:25:55 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:59:01 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:47:41 -0400, H the K wrote: On 9/25/09 11:33 AM, wrote: snipped for contextual obligations Then you should be able to evidentially reveal the other poster's identity. further redaction action What you think I "should" do and what *I* decide I will do only coincide when *I* decide they do. I'm sorry, Harry, but this doesn't even make sense, contextually or otherwise. That's rich. With all your ponderous scribbling you're having trouble parsing Harry's simple phrase. It's not the parsing that is problematic, JPS. It's the ostensible assumption on his part that I 'thought' he should reveal the other poster's identity. His response was juxtaposed below my assertion that he should be able to divulge the other person's identity. There was no requirement for him to do so, implicitly or explicitly. Does that make sense? There are support groups that help with comprehending "ponderous scribbling," if that will help at all. Fresh in from the Ponderosa with a mouthful. I haven't any trouble understanding your ponderosities. You're like a young jazz musician who knows how to play a lot of notes fast and hasn't yet discovered the spaces between the notes are what make the music worth listening to. You're a young writer, perhaps not in years. "He" reminds me of some of the freshmen I encountered when I taught bonehead English. There were always a couple of overwrought, purple prose wannabe writers among the students I taught in every class. If they were particularly obnoxious in class, I would slash and burn my way through their homework with a red pen. You never taught a damn thing. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 2:14 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:09:40 -0400, H the K wrote: snipped for Harry's own good You're a young writer, perhaps not in years. "He" reminds me of some of the freshmen I encountered when I taught bonehead English. There were always a couple of overwrought, purple prose wannabe writers among the students I taught in every class. If they were particularly obnoxious in class, I would slash and burn my way through their homework with a red pen. Harry, that reminds of me of my first year in college in comp class. I had submitted my first writing assignment, and a short time later the professor of the class came into the book store by the student union, having seen me in there, to commend me on my writing and the quality of the essay. I was surprised by that, of course. He said that I was far ahead of most other freshmen that he usually had in his class. He was equally surprised when he learned that I had little desire to be a writer. I went into engineering. Silly me. And now you sell insurance? Even professors can be buffoons, you know. Most who consider themselves right-of-center have little regard for the liberal arts so I haven't a clue why you'd think his commendation held any value. "Comp class" was the sort of official name of the "Bonehead English" classes I taught. "English composition 101." It sure was hell was *not* usually taught by "professors," but, rather, by lowly T.A.'s, or teaching assistants. That's what I was, a master's student in English trying to earn a few bucks to help defray my university costs. Bull****. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
H the K wrote:
On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. Donnie had nothing to do with this, WAFA. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Sep 25, 8:24*pm, The D wrote:
H the K wrote: On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message . .. On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" *wrote: *wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:s1lob5hnhcc9vshag36a8okcrul7inoftn@4ax. com... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" *wrote: *wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. *He/she is prolific though. *I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. *If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. Donnie had nothing to do with this, WAFA. ROTFLMAO!! |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:13:05 -0400, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Who is this Bob fella. No sirre Bob. Us conservatives are the reasonable ones. Whoopdedooo! That's the first I've heard of this... Reasonable, as in due diligence on those WMDs or taking the time to breathe before you accuse a dissenter of sedition? Reasonable as in aluminum tubes, yellowcake and mushroom clouds? Reasonable as in outing Valerie Plame, John Bolton and Karl Rove? Reasonable as in Larry Craig, Vitter, Sanford and the skank who hit on young male pages? Reasonable as in the NRA? Teabaggers, Birthers, Deathers, and those who can see across the water to Russia? Reasonable as in Joe Wilson screaming "liar" at the President? Are those the reasonable people you are? Clearly, you've now co-opted the word reasonable along with conservative. It now means asshole. ****in' unbelievable how you fantasize about your own kind. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Sep 25, 7:17*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 5:22 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message . .. nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive. Have a good weekend! Hmmm... I don't disparage those who have a different political philosophy.. "Unlike Republicans, Democrats are much less monolithic." "Perhaps they're clinging to their guns and bibles" "Or are you talking about Republicans, who didn't lift a finger when Bush spent like crazy? " "Sickening. Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh mentality." "Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. " That's just a quick review of a few of your posts where you most definitley *did* attempt to disparage those who have a different political philosophy. I'm sure you'll now say that they are just your observations, but they, by definition, "disparage those who have a different political philosophy". Words do have meaning, you know. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:54:06 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. By "side" he means you'll offer your skirt as a hiding place. Most of the serious headcases here maintain sock puppets so they don't get diagnosed with MPD, as would be the case with Toots. He's got a rich fantasy life wherein most people are conservative (the modern definition). |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 25, 7:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 5:22 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message . .. nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive. Have a good weekend! Hmmm... I don't disparage those who have a different political philosophy. "Unlike Republicans, Democrats are much less monolithic." "Perhaps they're clinging to their guns and bibles" "Or are you talking about Republicans, who didn't lift a finger when Bush spent like crazy? " "Sickening. Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh mentality." "Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. " That's just a quick review of a few of your posts where you most definitley *did* attempt to disparage those who have a different political philosophy. I'm sure you'll now say that they are just your observations, but they, by definition, "disparage those who have a different political philosophy". Words do have meaning, you know. Reply: Nothing was disparaging in anything I said. I didn't insinuate anything about you personally. However, you have no problem doing that with others. Words definitely have meaning, I do know. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"jps" wrote in message
... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:54:06 -0400, H the K wrote: On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. By "side" he means you'll offer your skirt as a hiding place. Well, I don't usually wear a skirt. Most of the serious headcases here maintain sock puppets so they don't get diagnosed with MPD, as would be the case with Toots. He's got a rich fantasy life wherein most people are conservative (the modern definition). I would think that would cause such a diagnosis. I don't really care to sort them all out. Some are obvious, some aren't. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 9/25/09 3:50 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Florida Jim is one of ranking assholes of rec.boats, a boatless, jealous, cantankerous old fart who hasn't had a decent job since being mustered out of the Vietnam era navy. He's also a coward. Apart from the Vietnam part, you described yourself to a tee. He's also a coward. That's the description of you, that explains why the Vietnam part doesn't apply. You are fooling no one, butthole. --Mike |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Who is this Bob fella. No sirre Bob. Us conservatives are the reasonable ones. You loons that fawn over liers, cheats, and thieves are the crazy ones. Krausie and company which includes you are beating a dead horse over all this political and economic nonsense. You cant change nuttin by bawling and blustering about it here. Go join some political action group or do something useful with your life instead of boring us to tears. Who's "Sweetie"? No such person here. Go yourself. You don't get to tell me what to do. Sweetie fits you better than name of the pen. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
|
Am not "Toot Sweet"
nom=de=plume wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:54:06 -0400, H the K wrote: On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality assessments? He's a great man to have on your side! -- John H Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his. Please...you're confusing the moron. By "side" he means you'll offer your skirt as a hiding place. Well, I don't usually wear a skirt. I didn't imagine you as the feminine type. |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 7:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 5:22 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my word. I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce. Frogwatch Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and we haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was never much of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go fast, I take a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like. Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges, even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining the "trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't want to participate anymore. Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we can have a lively discussion without screeching. I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon. You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have anything better to do? Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people Jimmy Bob. -- Nom=de=Plume Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged. Like most people, I call them the way I see them. Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive. Have a good weekend! Hmmm... I don't disparage those who have a different political philosophy. "Unlike Republicans, Democrats are much less monolithic." "Perhaps they're clinging to their guns and bibles" "Or are you talking about Republicans, who didn't lift a finger when Bush spent like crazy? " "Sickening. Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh mentality." "Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. " That's just a quick review of a few of your posts where you most definitley *did* attempt to disparage those who have a different political philosophy. I'm sure you'll now say that they are just your observations, but they, by definition, "disparage those who have a different political philosophy". Words do have meaning, you know. Reply: Nothing was disparaging in anything I said. I didn't insinuate anything about you personally. However, you have no problem doing that with others. Words definitely have meaning, I do know. Sweetcheeks, you have your bloomers all wedged up. Lighten up. Forget about politics for a while. Tell us about your boating adventure with that older couple. After all you signed on here to discuss boating, didn't you? |
Am not "Toot Sweet"
"Jim" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message ... Sweetcheeks, you have your bloomers all wedged up. Lighten up. Forget about politics for a while. Tell us about your boating adventure with that older couple. After all you signed on here to discuss boating, didn't you? That has to be the most sexist remark ever posted here. Congratulations Flatulent Jim. You've finally discovered your one true talent. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com