BoatBanter.com - The Dick Cheney

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)

- - The Dick Cheney (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/109760-dick-cheney.html)

nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
...
On 11-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

"I’ve come to the conclusion that the man truly is — whether he was
that way when I knew him before, when he was Secretary of Defense, I
don’t know, that’s not at issue with me any more — the man now is
just
crazy," Wilkerson said.
Tarring and feathering is too good for Cheney...
Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't
deal with
functional individuals in a faux "country."
Yeah, like someone who ignores the Constitution, exposes undercover CIA
agents, espouses torture. A real "functional" individual Mr. Cheney.

And he's a good hunting buddy, too.

Well, to be fair Shakespeare said something about killing lawyers... Of
course Dick wasn't a very good shot, having never served in the
military...

I assure you, there is no need for service in the military to be a good
shot.

Certainly correct. I was just thinking that *he* thinks he's a military
expert.

Krause is a military expert as well. You don't have to have served to be
an expert.

On 12-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't deal
with
functional individuals in a faux "country."

Yeah, like someone who ignores the Constitution, exposes undercover CIA
agents, espouses torture. A real "functional" individual Mr. Cheney.

Constitution? He's closer to factual adherence than 1) his boss, 2) Clinton
or all of any congress in 50 yearrs.

He didn't expose anyone - check the widely available public information.

Torture hasn't happened, but it SURE the hell should. Televised.

Sorry facts make you appear deficient. The reality is, you, like most
"Americans" have your panties in a wad with the democrat vs republican
thing. That's the root of your delusion.

On 12-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't deal
with
functional individuals in a faux "country."

That is one of the funniest comments I have ever seen on usenet.

Dick Cheney is a traitor, a man who ought to be investigated, indicted,
tried and if found guilty, convicted of any number of felonies.

How's the Thorazine supply?

If what you babbled were true in anyone's fantasy, the scum in congress
would have done something about it.

On 13-Sep-2009, Jim wrote:

I assure you, there is no need for service in the military to be a good

shot.

Certainly correct. I was just thinking that *he* thinks he's a military
expert.

Krause is a military expert as well. You don't have to have served to be
an expert.

Slick Willy and Buckwheat prove THAT!

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 12-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't deal
with
functional individuals in a faux "country."

Yeah, like someone who ignores the Constitution, exposes undercover CIA
agents, espouses torture. A real "functional" individual Mr. Cheney.

Constitution? He's closer to factual adherence than 1) his boss, 2)
Clinton
or all of any congress in 50 yearrs.

He didn't expose anyone - check the widely available public information.

Torture hasn't happened, but it SURE the hell should. Televised.

Sorry facts make you appear deficient. The reality is, you, like most
"Americans" have your panties in a wad with the democrat vs republican
thing. That's the root of your delusion.

Dick Cheney has only one interest... his interest. He continually put
himself above the law, and he certainly condones both the outing of an
undercover CIA operative and certainly was a party to the torture that went
on. If you're unwilling to believe that waterboarding is torture, I'm sure
there's someone available to try it on you. It's very clear what your
delusion is, I'm sorry but I can't help you with that.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Steve wrote:
On 13-Sep-2009, Jim wrote:

I assure you, there is no need for service in the military to be a good

shot.

Certainly correct. I was just thinking that *he* thinks he's a military
expert.

Krause is a military expert as well. You don't have to have served to be
an expert.

Slick Willy and Buckwheat prove THAT!
Yabut buckwheat says he has the weight of the world resting on his
shoulders. That has to count for something. Slick willy was just a party
animal who couldn't keep his fly zipped. I wonder how many state secrets
he gave up while looking at the top of some bimbo's head.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:33:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 12-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't deal
with
functional individuals in a faux "country."

Yeah, like someone who ignores the Constitution, exposes undercover CIA
agents, espouses torture. A real "functional" individual Mr. Cheney.

Constitution? He's closer to factual adherence than 1) his boss, 2)
Clinton
or all of any congress in 50 yearrs.

He didn't expose anyone - check the widely available public information.

Torture hasn't happened, but it SURE the hell should. Televised.

Sorry facts make you appear deficient. The reality is, you, like most
"Americans" have your panties in a wad with the democrat vs republican
thing. That's the root of your delusion.

Dick Cheney has only one interest... his interest. He continually put
himself above the law, and he certainly condones both the outing of an
undercover CIA operative and certainly was a party to the torture that went
on. If you're unwilling to believe that waterboarding is torture, I'm sure
there's someone available to try it on you. It's very clear what your
delusion is, I'm sorry but I can't help you with that.

****, did I miss something else?

Did someone ask you for help?

Is a threat to a family member 'torture'? Is waving an unloaded pistol
in your face 'torture'? Suppose someone just looked at you with their
eyes crossed. Would that qualify as 'torture'?

If you liberals are so worried about people, why not do something for
the poor, instead of just making them more poor?
--

John H

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:33:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 12-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Cheney was the only competent, focused, non butt lucking, intelligent
person
in any administration since the VERY early 90's. Bedwetters can't
deal
with
functional individuals in a faux "country."

Yeah, like someone who ignores the Constitution, exposes undercover CIA
agents, espouses torture. A real "functional" individual Mr. Cheney.

Constitution? He's closer to factual adherence than 1) his boss, 2)
Clinton
or all of any congress in 50 yearrs.

He didn't expose anyone - check the widely available public information.

Torture hasn't happened, but it SURE the hell should. Televised.

Sorry facts make you appear deficient. The reality is, you, like most
"Americans" have your panties in a wad with the democrat vs republican
thing. That's the root of your delusion.

Dick Cheney has only one interest... his interest. He continually put
himself above the law, and he certainly condones both the outing of an
undercover CIA operative and certainly was a party to the torture that
went
on. If you're unwilling to believe that waterboarding is torture, I'm sure
there's someone available to try it on you. It's very clear what your
delusion is, I'm sorry but I can't help you with that.

****, did I miss something else?

Possibly. I can't help with that either.

Did someone ask you for help?

Sometimes you don't have to wait to be asked.

Is a threat to a family member 'torture'? Is waving an unloaded pistol
in your face 'torture'? Suppose someone just looked at you with their
eyes crossed. Would that qualify as 'torture'?

?? You need to re-read the definition of torture and the treaty we pushed
for and signed forbiding it.

a.. anguish: extreme mental distress
a.. unbearable physical pain
a.. agony: intense feelings of suffering; acute mental or physical pain; "an
agony of doubt"; "the torments of the damned"
a.. torment: torment emotionally or mentally
a.. distortion: the act of distorting something so it seems to mean
something it was not intended to mean
a.. subject to torture; "The sinners will be tormented in Hell, according to
the Bible"
a.. the deliberate, systematic, or wanton infliction of physical or mental
suffering by one or more persons in an attempt to force another person to
yield information or to make a confession or for any other reason; "it
required unnatural torturing to extract a confession"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...gainst_Torture
(notice the signatories)

If you liberals are so worried about people, why not do something for
the poor, instead of just making them more poor?

We have and we do. You're clearly not interested in the poor, just keeping
them that way.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 14-Sep-2009, Jim wrote:

Yabut buckwheat says he has the weight of the world resting on his
shoulders. That has to count for something. Slick willy was just a party
animal who couldn't keep his fly zipped. I wonder how many state secrets
he gave up while looking at the top of some bimbo's head.

Everybody has some skill, except the "American" (whatever the hell that is
now) voter.