In article 5c05ead9-6528-437b-8434-
,
says...

On Sep 9, 12:08*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:52:42 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
Read this - it will completely blow that argument out of the water.

"One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led
by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can
also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the
politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move
a society forward in the 21st century."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...dman.html?_r=3

"Reasonably enlightened" - China.

WTF?

This op-ed piece can't be serious about a reasonably enlightened
China:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM0cFEXG_mA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1DNjJd2YfA

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

It is serious because this is the way liberals think. This is why
they embrace Chavez and Castro. In their frustration over their
inability to destroy the Republic in just 8 months, they have allowed
the mask to slip revealing what they really want. 2009 liberalism is
truly fascism. This is what we are fighting. They do not believe in
representative democracy but in an autocracy led by elites
(themselves). We should all print out the NYT editorial to remind
ourselves of the true nature of the fight.
So, yes, they want a China style system where protestors are rounded
up and shot so their organs can be harvested and sold. They want a
system where policies are handed down regardless of what the people
want. Democrats do not trust the masses and believe only themselves
have the answers.

Hey, look on the bright side... You would probably be spared to invent
all kinds of new toys for the regime.. snerk

--
No more serious politics...

Wafa free since 2009