On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:39 -0400, BAR wrote:

One would think the people complaining about this speech would feel a
bit silly (or manipulated) after reading it. But most won't.

When you've had 96 hours to "update" the speech you have the opportunity
tone it down. It would have been interesting to see the speech in its
form as of last Thursday morning.

If you guys would stop engaging Harry he'd go away.

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:52:27 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:39 -0400, BAR wrote:

One would think the people complaining about this speech would feel a
bit silly (or manipulated) after reading it. But most won't.

When you've had 96 hours to "update" the speech you have the opportunity
tone it down. It would have been interesting to see the speech in its
form as of last Thursday morning.

If you guys would stop engaging Harry he'd go away.

And here you are adding to the thread.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:39 -0400, BAR wrote:

One would think the people complaining about this speech would feel a
bit silly (or manipulated) after reading it. But most won't.
When you've had 96 hours to "update" the speech you have the opportunity
tone it down. It would have been interesting to see the speech in its
form as of last Thursday morning.

If you guys would stop engaging Harry he'd go away.



Speaking of going away...isn't it time for another of your trips to
places you've been before?


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:39 -0400, BAR wrote:

One would think the people complaining about this speech would feel a
bit silly (or manipulated) after reading it. But most won't.

When you've had 96 hours to "update" the speech you have the opportunity
tone it down. It would have been interesting to see the speech in its
form as of last Thursday morning.

If you guys would stop engaging Harry he'd go away.

Here, here...

--
Wafa free since 2009