If you loved the...
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:11:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Sep 5, 8:46*pm, H the K wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
om...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
jps wrote:
astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers,
cheered for the screaming *Deathers, you're gonna love the newest
sequel for bigots and sore losers...
Introducing The Speechers!!!
Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!!
"Statements coming from the right don't have to be true.

They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside
these sore losers and bigots."

Do you remember who said this.
It's the incompetence, stupid.
It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron.
You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the
righties here, including you.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but
you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't
think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's
more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away
one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm
not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead.

It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication.
Those are some of the main ingredients of racism.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so
segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a
black man.

We accept the acheivement of a black man in the same regard as a white
man. Whereas crackers like you would more likely account it to the
reverse racism of affirmative action.

Thye are such racists that in their belief that blacks are
less capable than whites that they consciously vote with race in mind
to prove they are not racists.

I voted for the most capable person, not based on color. I celebrate
that a black man has finally been accepted by the majority of citizens
in this country as capable.

These guys must live in lily white
enclaves and have almost no contact with any other race.

I live in a mixed race area and my kids go to school with all colors,
races, creeds, religions. They play sports with them, go to church
with them, eat with them, invite them to our houses to celebrate
birthdays.

I grew up among black people, went to a high school that was 48% black
and live in a city that ever since 1970 has had black politicians
representing all of us so race almost never enters into who we vote
for. Living in a city that is equally split tween blacks and whites
causes you to have to get along and work with people of another
color.

Oh, you "have to get along" -- as if it's a chore. Who's the racist
cracker here?


It always surprises me to go up north and after a few days I
finally realize what is so different that makes life so one-
dimensional, almost no black people to give a diff perspective on
things.
In general, I find liberals to be racists of the most pernicious kind,
they will not admit to racism but they show it in every way by their
subconcious feelings of the inferiority of blacks that causes them
simply act stupid by trying to atone for being white. Of course,
there are some blacks who take advantage of this white liberal guilt
but many are truly embarassed by it.

Excellent example of projection. **** bubbling up from the
sub-conscience of The Frog.

So, when libs constantly point out that Obama is black, it is evidence
of their own racism.

It's crackers like you who react to him in a way that makes it
perfectly obvious that you're a bigoted, ignorant, white surpremicist.

If you loved the...
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:20:01 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Sep 5, 9:16*pm, H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:

It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so
segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a
black man.

I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much.

--
The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no
scruples, who’ll turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations.

Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success.
However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am
far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here.

You're insane not to mention delusional.

If you loved the...
 

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:38:28 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Sep 5, 9:24*pm, H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:16 pm, H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:

It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so
segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a
black man.
I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much.

--
The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no
scruples, who’ll turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations.

Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success.
However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am
far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here.

Yeah, you're such a success about every two weeks you're in here begging
for ideas you can turn into products you can screw, er, sell to consumers.

How's that fishing reel refinishing project going?

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

The nation does not need for me to be successful but we do need a
successful president. So far, we have a complete failure. Bush
managed to get stuff done with both houses of congress in Dem hands so
why can't Oboma get anything done with a huge majority in both
houses? The answer is simple: incompetence.
The dems had it all, an unpopular Repub president, media who could
find nothing wrong with Oboma, a majority in both houses, president
Oboma adored by the whole world and............................they
blew it, total complete failure.
You cannot blame the Repubs anymore, you cannot blame Bush, you cannot
blame Karl Rove. Your failure is your own fault.

Bush ginned up fear. Obama is taking on health care. Which do you
think is easier?

You've again proven yourself a very small minded person.

If you loved the...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists.

I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are
the real, hard core, racists.


I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific.

Say what?

If you loved the...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him
elected.


Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a
running mate for McCain.

Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It
is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008.

If you loved the...
 

On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:34:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included,
but
you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I
don't
think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's
more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away
one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly.
I'm
not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead.

There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom
you didn't know.

You sound very angry. I don't know H K either.


I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure
horse****.

This seems to be a theme of yours.

'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a
president.

You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to
something deep-seated and fearful.

Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the
guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps
that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal
'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about
excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found
success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'.

Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated,
fearful racism?
--
John H

"Vote for a Democrat, it's easier than working!"

If you loved the...
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists.

I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often
are the real, hard core, racists.


I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific.

Say what?


I don't believe yelling that someone is a racist helps much, even if it
happens they're right that the others *are* actually racists.

--
Nom=de=Plume

If you loved the...
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him
elected.


Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a
running mate for McCain.

Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It
is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008.


Pres. Obama will almost certainly be the D's candidate. It would be nice if
there was a viable R candidate. I don't see one on the horizon, but the
election is a long way off. It would also be nice to see a viable Ind.
candidate.

--
Nom=de=Plume

If you loved the...
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a
president.

You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to
something deep-seated and fearful.

Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the
guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps
that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal
'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about
excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found
success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'.

I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but
that wouldn't be fair.

Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance,
lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think
you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all
of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did.
Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now?

Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated,
fearful racism?

Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will.
While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney
thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child
had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain
about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke
to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting
president.

--
Nom=de=Plume

If you loved the...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a
president.
You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to
something deep-seated and fearful.
Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the
guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps
that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal
'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about
excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found
success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'.

I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but
that wouldn't be fair.

Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance,
lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think
you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all
of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did.
Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now?

Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated,
fearful racism?

Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will.
While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney
thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child
had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain
about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke
to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting
president.



Herring is a trashy racist. There's no reason to be in shock and awe at
his racially motivated remarks against Obama.



--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All