| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
If you loved the...
astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! |
If you loved the...
jps wrote:
astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. |
If you loved the...
On Sep 5, 5:41*pm, Jim wrote:
jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming *Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. |
If you loved the...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
If you loved the...
"H the K" wrote in message
m... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication. Those are some of the main ingredients of racism. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
If you loved the...
On Sep 5, 8:46*pm, H the K wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming *Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly.. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication. Those are some of the main ingredients of racism. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. Thye are such racists that in their belief that blacks are less capable than whites that they consciously vote with race in mind to prove they are not racists. These guys must live in lily white enclaves and have almost no contact with any other race. I grew up among black people, went to a high school that was 48% black and live in a city that ever since 1970 has had black politicians representing all of us so race almost never enters into who we vote for. Living in a city that is equally split tween blacks and whites causes you to have to get along and work with people of another color. It always surprises me to go up north and after a few days I finally realize what is so different that makes life so one- dimensional, almost no black people to give a diff perspective on things. In general, I find liberals to be racists of the most pernicious kind, they will not admit to racism but they show it in every way by their subconcious feelings of the inferiority of blacks that causes them simply act stupid by trying to atone for being white. Of course, there are some blacks who take advantage of this white liberal guilt but many are truly embarassed by it. So, when libs constantly point out that Obama is black, it is evidence of their own racism. |
If you loved the...
Frogwatch wrote:
It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. |
If you loved the...
On Sep 5, 9:16*pm, H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations.. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. |
If you loved the...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:16 pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. Yeah, you're such a success about every two weeks you're in here begging for ideas you can turn into products you can screw, er, sell to consumers. How's that fishing reel refinishing project going? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
If you loved the...
On Sep 5, 9:24*pm, H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 9:16 pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. Yeah, you're such a success about every two weeks you're in here begging for ideas you can turn into products you can screw, er, sell to consumers.. How's that fishing reel refinishing project going? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All The nation does not need for me to be successful but we do need a successful president. So far, we have a complete failure. Bush managed to get stuff done with both houses of congress in Dem hands so why can't Oboma get anything done with a huge majority in both houses? The answer is simple: incompetence. The dems had it all, an unpopular Repub president, media who could find nothing wrong with Oboma, a majority in both houses, president Oboma adored by the whole world and............................they blew it, total complete failure. You cannot blame the Repubs anymore, you cannot blame Bush, you cannot blame Karl Rove. Your failure is your own fault. |
If you loved the...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:24 pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 9:16 pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. Yeah, you're such a success about every two weeks you're in here begging for ideas you can turn into products you can screw, er, sell to consumers. How's that fishing reel refinishing project going? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All The nation does not need for me to be successful but we do need a successful president. hehehe....whatever winds that one spring no battery clock of yours. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
If you loved the...
"H the K" wrote in message
m... I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication. Those are some of the main ingredients of racism. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication. Those are some of the main ingredients of racism. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. |
If you loved the...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:21:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom you didn't know. I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure horse****. It's you, Harry, and those like you who keep throwing up the racist strawman. 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
If you loved the...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:21:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom you didn't know. I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure horse****. It's you, Harry, and those like you who keep throwing up the racist strawman. 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him elected. |
If you loved the...
H the K wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. What happened to his white half? White mother, black father = 1/2 white, 1/2 black. At best Obama is a mutt. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. Did you call Van Jones, the racist, and let him cry on your should after he submitted his resignation. |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
"John H." wrote in message
... I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom you didn't know. You sound very angry. I don't know H K either. I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure horse****. This seems to be a theme of yours. 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to something deep-seated and fearful. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him elected. Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a running mate for McCain. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:11:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 8:46*pm, H the K wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: astroturfing Teabaggers, fawned over the clenched baggie Birthers, cheered for the screaming *Deathers, you're gonna love the newest sequel for bigots and sore losers... Introducing The Speechers!!! Get it while you can, this will only last a few more days!!! "Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots." Do you remember who said this. It's the incompetence, stupid. It's the hatred of seeing a black man in the white house, moron. You can see it bubbling just below the surface of virtually all the righties here, including you. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. It's racism, and fear, misunderstanding and lack of sophistication. Those are some of the main ingredients of racism. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. We accept the acheivement of a black man in the same regard as a white man. Whereas crackers like you would more likely account it to the reverse racism of affirmative action. Thye are such racists that in their belief that blacks are less capable than whites that they consciously vote with race in mind to prove they are not racists. I voted for the most capable person, not based on color. I celebrate that a black man has finally been accepted by the majority of citizens in this country as capable. These guys must live in lily white enclaves and have almost no contact with any other race. I live in a mixed race area and my kids go to school with all colors, races, creeds, religions. They play sports with them, go to church with them, eat with them, invite them to our houses to celebrate birthdays. I grew up among black people, went to a high school that was 48% black and live in a city that ever since 1970 has had black politicians representing all of us so race almost never enters into who we vote for. Living in a city that is equally split tween blacks and whites causes you to have to get along and work with people of another color. Oh, you "have to get along" -- as if it's a chore. Who's the racist cracker here? It always surprises me to go up north and after a few days I finally realize what is so different that makes life so one- dimensional, almost no black people to give a diff perspective on things. In general, I find liberals to be racists of the most pernicious kind, they will not admit to racism but they show it in every way by their subconcious feelings of the inferiority of blacks that causes them simply act stupid by trying to atone for being white. Of course, there are some blacks who take advantage of this white liberal guilt but many are truly embarassed by it. Excellent example of projection. **** bubbling up from the sub-conscience of The Frog. So, when libs constantly point out that Obama is black, it is evidence of their own racism. It's crackers like you who react to him in a way that makes it perfectly obvious that you're a bigoted, ignorant, white surpremicist. |
If you loved the...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:20:01 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 9:16*pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. You're insane not to mention delusional. |
If you loved the...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:38:28 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 9:24*pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 9:16 pm, H the K wrote: Frogwatch wrote: It amazes me to see people like HK and jps whose lives are so segregated that they are impressed by any degree of achievement by a black man. I suppose to a failure like you, Obama's achievement is...not so much. -- The contemporary conservative movement is run by crazy people with no scruples, who値l turn anything into a pretext to level wild accusations. Dunno, I never wanted to be president so I cannot call it a success. However, as far as success for what I have been paid to do, Yes, I am far more successful than Obama as has just about everybody else here. Yeah, you're such a success about every two weeks you're in here begging for ideas you can turn into products you can screw, er, sell to consumers. How's that fishing reel refinishing project going? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All The nation does not need for me to be successful but we do need a successful president. So far, we have a complete failure. Bush managed to get stuff done with both houses of congress in Dem hands so why can't Oboma get anything done with a huge majority in both houses? The answer is simple: incompetence. The dems had it all, an unpopular Repub president, media who could find nothing wrong with Oboma, a majority in both houses, president Oboma adored by the whole world and............................they blew it, total complete failure. You cannot blame the Repubs anymore, you cannot blame Bush, you cannot blame Karl Rove. Your failure is your own fault. Bush ginned up fear. Obama is taking on health care. Which do you think is easier? You've again proven yourself a very small minded person. |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific. Say what? |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him elected. Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a running mate for McCain. Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008. |
If you loved the...
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:34:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . I don't know Frogwatch well enough to make the claim that he's included, but you're right on target about the bubbling beneath the surface part. I don't think it's really racism (one group is better than another). I think it's more about fear, misunderstanding, and unsophistication. If you take away one of the three, then there's hope. Having all three in play is deadly. I'm not talking about the "leaders." I'm talking about those who are lead. There you go. Now you're doing the puppy thing with Harry Krause, whom you didn't know. You sound very angry. I don't know H K either. I'll give this response of yours the comment it deserves - pure horse****. This seems to be a theme of yours. 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to something deep-seated and fearful. Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal 'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'. Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? -- John H "Vote for a Democrat, it's easier than working!" |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific. Say what? I don't believe yelling that someone is a racist helps much, even if it happens they're right that the others *are* actually racists. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him elected. Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a running mate for McCain. Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008. Pres. Obama will almost certainly be the D's candidate. It would be nice if there was a viable R candidate. I don't see one on the horizon, but the election is a long way off. It would also be nice to see a viable Ind. candidate. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
"JohnH" wrote in message
... 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to something deep-seated and fearful. Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal 'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'. I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message ... 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to something deep-seated and fearful. Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal 'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'. I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. Herring is a trashy racist. There's no reason to be in shock and awe at his racially motivated remarks against Obama. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific. Say what? I don't believe yelling that someone is a racist helps much, even if it happens they're right that the others *are* actually racists. I agree. Yelling is not a convincing way to make a point. Former senator Kennedy comes immediately to mind. I'm sure there some folks here that use that tactic. |
If you loved the...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... His dark skin and claimed ethnicity are the ONLY things that got him elected. Yes, and the bankrupt ideas of the other side, and the poor choice in a running mate for McCain. Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008. Pres. Obama will almost certainly be the D's candidate. It would be nice if there was a viable R candidate. I don't see one on the horizon, but the election is a long way off. It would also be nice to see a viable Ind. candidate. I'd like to know what makes you so certain. The Rs made a terrible mistake by not giving Mitt Romney more serious consideration. |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... I think there are only a very small number who are actually racists. I'm sure that you have noticed that those who use the word most often are the real, hard core, racists. I don't agree. They are perhaps the loudest but not the most prolific. Say what? I don't believe yelling that someone is a racist helps much, even if it happens they're right that the others *are* actually racists. I agree. Yelling is not a convincing way to make a point. Former senator Kennedy comes immediately to mind. I'm sure there some folks here that use that tactic. Yes, he yelled from time to time. McCain did/does also. There are plenty of example from both sides. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
"Jim" wrote in message
... Perhaps the R's and D's will produce more worthy candidates for 2012. It is sad that they couldn't do it in 2008. Pres. Obama will almost certainly be the D's candidate. It would be nice if there was a viable R candidate. I don't see one on the horizon, but the election is a long way off. It would also be nice to see a viable Ind. candidate. I'd like to know what makes you so certain. The Rs made a terrible mistake by not giving Mitt Romney more serious consideration. Because it's traditional. Carter was a good example. He was clearly not doing well, and Kennedy ran against him unsuccessfully of course. I actually liked McCain, even though I thought he was too old-school. Then, when his campaign went off the rails, it was just embarrasing. Many believe Mormonism is a cult. I don't think that's the case, but in any case it didn't help. My dealings with Mormons indicate to me that they're fine people, generally honest, and they make great vetenarians. -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:56:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . 'Bama's color has absolutely nothing to do with his failures as a president. You can't even stoop so low as to spell his name right? That speaks to something deep-seated and fearful. Something? Or something racist. Let's stay on track here. I find the guy's arrogance, lying, actions, and plans worthy of anger. Perhaps that's coming through. But don't be so quick to apply the liberal 'racist' label. Skin color is something you folks worry about excessively, because Jackson, Sharpton, and the rest of you have found success with blacks by calling Republicans 'racist'. I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. If you can't see any arrogance, lying, etc., then further discussion is pointless. I doubt if you can see *anything* the slightest bit wrong with anything Obama has done. So be it. I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name. To my knowledge, unless you're an 'oldie' here with a 'pen name', you weren't here when the Bush bashing was at its height. Be back in a week. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" |
If you loved the...
"JohnH" wrote in message
... I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. If you can't see any arrogance, lying, etc., then further discussion is pointless. I doubt if you can see *anything* the slightest bit wrong with anything Obama has done. So, again, you refuse to answer the question. Show me where I *******ised Bush's name? No answer. I can see the arrogance of the right-wing nutcases who grasp at anything to "win." It was ok when Bush arrogantly talked about the war and then when back to his 1/3 of his presidency vacation... That's right 1000 days on vacation. But, Obama going on a short vacation, that's horrible, horrible. Further discussion is certainly pointless if you're unwilling to actually identify Obama's supposed arrogance or malfeasance. He's been in office just a short time. He inherited a war in Afganistan that had no strategy. He's formulating his policies and procedures, but it's all his fault. You continually claim that I don't ever see anything wrong with what Obama has done, which is absolutely false. I've said many times, even though you refuse to see it, that all presidents, all elected officials should be held to high standards. If you're just a troll, please feel free to let me know, and I'll stop bothering to have a rational discussion. -- Nom=de=Plume So be it. I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name. To my knowledge, unless you're an 'oldie' here with a 'pen name', you weren't here when the Bush bashing was at its height. Be back in a week. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" -- Nom=de=Plume |
If you loved the...
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. If you can't see any arrogance, lying, etc., then further discussion is pointless. I doubt if you can see *anything* the slightest bit wrong with anything Obama has done. So, again, you refuse to answer the question. Show me where I *******ised Bush's name? No answer. I can see the arrogance of the right-wing nutcases who grasp at anything to "win." It was ok when Bush arrogantly talked about the war and then when back to his 1/3 of his presidency vacation... That's right 1000 days on vacation. But, Obama going on a short vacation, that's horrible, horrible. Further discussion is certainly pointless if you're unwilling to actually identify Obama's supposed arrogance or malfeasance. He's been in office just a short time. He inherited a war in Afganistan that had no strategy. He's formulating his policies and procedures, but it's all his fault. You continually claim that I don't ever see anything wrong with what Obama has done, which is absolutely false. I've said many times, even though you refuse to see it, that all presidents, all elected officials should be held to high standards. If you're just a troll, please feel free to let me know, and I'll stop bothering to have a rational discussion. -- Nom=de=Plume So be it. I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name. To my knowledge, unless you're an 'oldie' here with a 'pen name', you weren't here when the Bush bashing was at its height. Be back in a week. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Again, I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name, so why do you expect me to go searching for proof that you did. I've not seen you disagree with anything Obama has done, thus the comment. Saying, "...all elected officials should be held to high standards" does not express disagreement with anything Obama has done. -- John H |
If you loved the...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. If you can't see any arrogance, lying, etc., then further discussion is pointless. I doubt if you can see *anything* the slightest bit wrong with anything Obama has done. So, again, you refuse to answer the question. Show me where I *******ised Bush's name? No answer. I can see the arrogance of the right-wing nutcases who grasp at anything to "win." It was ok when Bush arrogantly talked about the war and then when back to his 1/3 of his presidency vacation... That's right 1000 days on vacation. But, Obama going on a short vacation, that's horrible, horrible. Further discussion is certainly pointless if you're unwilling to actually identify Obama's supposed arrogance or malfeasance. He's been in office just a short time. He inherited a war in Afganistan that had no strategy. He's formulating his policies and procedures, but it's all his fault. You continually claim that I don't ever see anything wrong with what Obama has done, which is absolutely false. I've said many times, even though you refuse to see it, that all presidents, all elected officials should be held to high standards. If you're just a troll, please feel free to let me know, and I'll stop bothering to have a rational discussion. -- Nom=de=Plume So be it. I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name. To my knowledge, unless you're an 'oldie' here with a 'pen name', you weren't here when the Bush bashing was at its height. Be back in a week. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Again, I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name, so why do you expect me to go searching for proof that you did. I've not seen you disagree with anything Obama has done, thus the comment. Saying, "...all elected officials should be held to high standards" does not express disagreement with anything Obama has done. -- John H And I've never seen you agree with anything Obama has done. |
If you loved the...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:56:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... I don't know you well enough to speculate. I could guess and say racism, but that wouldn't be fair. Honestly, I don't see how you could be so angry at his so-called arrogance, lying, etc., since he's mostly just a center-left politician. I would think you would have been much angrier with Bush when he was president, given all of the same things you accuse the current president of, Bush certainly did. Were you much angrier then? Are we seeing your better side now? Were all the variations of Bush's name based on some deep-seated, fearful racism? Please show me where I *******ized Bush's name? I didn't and never will. While I despised him while he was president and wish to see him and Cheney thrown in jail for their crimes, I still respected the office. If my child had an opportunity to listen to him speak, I wouldn't prevent it or complain about it. In fact, Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs did exactly that... spoke to kids. I'm totally disgusted by the low-brow reaction to a sitting president. If you can't see any arrogance, lying, etc., then further discussion is pointless. I doubt if you can see *anything* the slightest bit wrong with anything Obama has done. So, again, you refuse to answer the question. Show me where I *******ised Bush's name? No answer. I can see the arrogance of the right-wing nutcases who grasp at anything to "win." It was ok when Bush arrogantly talked about the war and then when back to his 1/3 of his presidency vacation... That's right 1000 days on vacation. But, Obama going on a short vacation, that's horrible, horrible. Further discussion is certainly pointless if you're unwilling to actually identify Obama's supposed arrogance or malfeasance. He's been in office just a short time. He inherited a war in Afganistan that had no strategy. He's formulating his policies and procedures, but it's all his fault. You continually claim that I don't ever see anything wrong with what Obama has done, which is absolutely false. I've said many times, even though you refuse to see it, that all presidents, all elected officials should be held to high standards. If you're just a troll, please feel free to let me know, and I'll stop bothering to have a rational discussion. -- Nom=de=Plume So be it. I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name. To my knowledge, unless you're an 'oldie' here with a 'pen name', you weren't here when the Bush bashing was at its height. Be back in a week. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Again, I didn't say you *******ized Bush's name, so why do you expect me to go searching for proof that you did. I've not seen you disagree with anything Obama has done, thus the comment. Saying, "...all elected officials should be held to high standards" does not express disagreement with anything Obama has done. -- John H And I've never seen you agree with anything Obama has done. I most certainly have. You are simply providing proof that you don't read posts. -- John H |
If you loved the...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:56:18 -0400, NotNow wrote:
JohnH wrote: And I've never seen you agree with anything Obama has done. And here are some more great things 'Bama has done: Obama's First Six Months' "Accomplishments" 1. Offended the Queen of England . 2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia . 3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega. 4. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek. 5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia . 6. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras .. 7. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions while they're building their nuclear weapons. 8. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions. 9. Expanded the bailouts. 10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian. 11. Doubled our national debt. 12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM. 13. Released information on U.S. Intelligence gathering despite urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA directors. 14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two other nominees withdrew after they couldn't take the heat. 15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military veterans and abortion opponents as "dange rs to the nation." 16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and instead refers to such acts as "man made disasters." 17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America 's world leadership. 18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country was because of us. 19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from the Department of Commerce. 20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-old whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States . 21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the next day announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by pouring water up their noses. 22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City that frightened thousands of New Yorkers. 23. Sent his National Defense Advisor to Europe to assure them that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special manner and they might be on their own with the Muslims. 24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with terrorist Hamas against Israel. 25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out retired investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer billions in the process. 26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American industry even less competitive while costing homeowners thousands per year. 27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians, increase taxes yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with government bureaucrats deciding who gets care and who doesn't. Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die." -- John H |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ｩ2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com