On Sep 2, 2:47*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:00*am, H K wrote:





thunder wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:22:39 -0500, jpjccd wrote:

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:56:50 -0700, Jim wrote:

In fairness, the budget surplus was due to both parties cooperating.. *It
only took one party a few months to undue the surplus. *Which one was
that?
Any reasonable debate will not be enhanced by citing cynical, biased
pieces written by partisans.

There has never been a "surplus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt

Not true. *You can have a *budget* surplus and still have debt. *Bush did
inherit a $128 billion surplus.

According to the Repubs here, it just isn't *fair* to keep bringing up
Bush as if he were responsible for the messes Obama inherited.

I mean, just because Bush was the worst president in the history of this
country, and screwed up just about everything he touched, and did so
over eight years, he's been out of office for months now.

Relax Herr Krause. Your President Elect *has been in office for months
now. In fact, he took eight months to double the debt the former
president compiled in eight years, and will probably double the
present debt within the next two years.

which is what bush had planned anyhow. the TARP ideas were floated and
defined by bernanke under bush. and bush agreed

But that's alright, Herr Krause. *It does seem fairly well known that
you can't see the forest for the trees

you right wingers don't know history. even if it's yesterday's history