wf3h wrote:
On Sep 1, 1:53 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 31, 5:02 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 31, 3:33 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."
Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".
Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
--
how did bush say he was gonna pay for the iraq war?
how did the GOP say they were gonna pay for the tax cuts for the
wealthy?
More 'Bush Rationale' which has nothing to do with the Obamacare Act.
--
uh...no. a comparison is being made between policies of the GOP which
benefit the top 1% and those of the democrats which benefit the middle
class
Uh, uh, uh, uh, the subject was healthcare. Obamacare, to be specific.

uh no. the subject was liars and who steals money. you think obama
does, while you grovel in poverty, courtesy of the GOP.
those who are sycophants of the rich hate the middle class and want
them to be held in poverty...think mexico.
Get over it. You should have paid attention to your assets. A fool and
his money are soon parted. Don't cry over spilled milk, etc. By now
you should get it.
--

i did pay attention. me and a hundred million other hard working
middle class americans who thought the rich would, as they said they
would, provide a decent retirement income if we trusted them

you know...like you continue to say we should...


Remember that herring is sucking on the government teat for his
retirement...he is not in the same loop as those who got screwed by wall
street.

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:32:14 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 1, 1:53*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 31, 5:02*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:33*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...

A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
--

how did bush say he was gonna pay for the iraq war?

how did the GOP say they were gonna pay for the tax cuts for the
wealthy?

More 'Bush Rationale' which has nothing to do with the Obamacare Act.
--

uh...no. a comparison is being made between policies of the GOP which
benefit the top 1% and those of the democrats which benefit the middle
class

Uh, uh, uh, uh, the subject was healthcare. Obamacare, to be specific.

uh no. the subject was liars and who steals money. you think obama
does, while you grovel in poverty, courtesy of the GOP.

those who are sycophants of the rich hate the middle class and want
them to be held in poverty...think mexico.

Get over it. You should have paid attention to your assets. A fool and
his money are soon parted. Don't cry over spilled milk, etc. By now
you should get it.
--

i did pay attention. me and a hundred million other hard working
middle class americans who thought the rich would, as they said they
would, provide a decent retirement income if we trusted them

you know...like you continue to say we should...

Show me.

I had investments. Still do.

You blew it. You know it. Now stop your sniveling.

Arguing with a tumbleweed is fun. You never know which way it'll roll
next.
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

On Sep 1, 5:06*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:32:14 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:



On Sep 1, 1:53*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 31, 5:02*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:33*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...

A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
--

how did bush say he was gonna pay for the iraq war?

how did the GOP say they were gonna pay for the tax cuts for the
wealthy?

More 'Bush Rationale' which has nothing to do with the Obamacare Act.

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 1, 5:06*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:32:14 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:



On Sep 1, 1:53*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 31, 5:02*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:33*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...

A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
--

how did bush say he was gonna pay for the iraq war?

how did the GOP say they were gonna pay for the tax cuts for the
wealthy?

More 'Bush Rationale' which has nothing to do with the Obamacare Act.
--

uh...no. a comparison is being made between policies of the GOP which
benefit the top 1% and those of the democrats which benefit the middle
class

Uh, uh, uh, uh, the subject was healthcare. Obamacare, to be specific.

uh no. the subject was liars and who steals money. you think obama
does, while you grovel in poverty, courtesy of the GOP.

those who are sycophants of the rich hate the middle class and want
them to be held in poverty...think mexico.

Get over it. You should have paid attention to your assets. A fool and
his money are soon parted. Don't cry over spilled milk, etc. By now
you should get it.
--

i did pay attention. me and a hundred million other hard working
middle class americans who thought the rich would, as they said they
would, provide a decent retirement income if we trusted them

you know...like you continue to say we should...

Show me.

I had investments. Still do.

IOW you don't follow the news. you're unaware of what's happened to
the middle class in the past year

Uh, uh, uh, I *am* middle class, and I *have* been around the past
year.

You blew it. You know it. Now stop your sniveling.]]]

uh no. your friends the rich folks blew it AND they took my money AND
they made me pay for it

My friends are all middle class or lower middle class also. If the
rich took your money, it's because you weren't attending to it. It's
actually kind of funny to read your 'anti-rich' rants.


guess what, douche bag, i AM paying attention. that's why it'll never
happen again since we have to tax the rich. that's 'paying attention'

It didn't take long to revert to name-calling, did it?

Arguing with a tumbleweed is fun. You never know which way it'll roll
next.

says the guy who thinks it's 1928.

--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:00 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...


A bit over 7 months now.
And thus far no terrorist attacks on the Homeland.
If Obama keeps us safe for 11 more days he'll prove he's a better man
at protecting the citizens of the United States of America from
massive terrorist attack during the first year in office than was GWB.
Then we go from there to other record settings, for good or bad.
I'm keeping score.

--Vic


Holy ****! That is the 88888888 thing you have ever said.. Fact is,
BinLaden didn't start planning 911 on Jan 20, 01 and you know it...
Please don't step into W3fhs' mold of bumper sticker mentality.

I remember watching the towers come down and the horror of seeing all
those innocent people killed. I was ****ed that our leadership
allowed that to happen. Didn't give a thought to Bill Clinton.
If something like that happens again I won't give a thought to GWB.
It'll be on Obama's back. I won't care if it was planned while GWB
was in office.
Same with the economy. It's Obama's economy.
I'm not blaming GWB for escalating unemployment.
GWB is gone. Obama is responsible.
You guys can blame whoever want for whatever you want.
Don't bother me. Freedom of speech.
It was Dick Cheney boasting/lying about him keeping us safe for "8
years" that got me thinking about the scorecard.
Facts is facts.

--Vic

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:22:16 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:00 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...


A bit over 7 months now.
And thus far no terrorist attacks on the Homeland.
If Obama keeps us safe for 11 more days he'll prove he's a better man
at protecting the citizens of the United States of America from
massive terrorist attack during the first year in office than was GWB.
Then we go from there to other record settings, for good or bad.
I'm keeping score.

--Vic


Holy ****! That is the 88888888 thing you have ever said.. Fact is,
BinLaden didn't start planning 911 on Jan 20, 01 and you know it...
Please don't step into W3fhs' mold of bumper sticker mentality.

I remember watching the towers come down and the horror of seeing all
those innocent people killed. I was ****ed that our leadership
allowed that to happen. Didn't give a thought to Bill Clinton.
If something like that happens again I won't give a thought to GWB.
It'll be on Obama's back. I won't care if it was planned while GWB
was in office.
Same with the economy. It's Obama's economy.
I'm not blaming GWB for escalating unemployment.
GWB is gone. Obama is responsible.
You guys can blame whoever want for whatever you want.
Don't bother me. Freedom of speech.
It was Dick Cheney boasting/lying about him keeping us safe for "8
years" that got me thinking about the scorecard.
Facts is facts.

--Vic

....and besides that, BO has saved over 4.5 million jobs in only nine
months.
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

On Sep 1, 6:06*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

i did pay attention. me and a hundred million other hard working
middle class americans who thought the rich would, as they said they
would, provide a decent retirement income if we trusted them

you know...like you continue to say we should...

Show me.

I had investments. Still do.

IOW you don't follow the news. you're unaware of what's happened to
the middle class in the past year

Uh, uh, uh, I *am* middle class, and I *have* been around the past
year.

IOW you're a sock puppet for right wing myths.




You blew it. You know it. Now stop your sniveling.]]]

uh no. your friends the rich folks blew it AND they took my money AND
they made me pay for it

My friends are all middle class or lower middle class also. If the
rich took your money, it's because you weren't attending to it. It's
actually kind of funny to read your 'anti-rich' rants.

uh..i AM paying attention. YOU are not. sorry. that's why i know what
the rich did.

you? you're still waiting for the tooth fairy
]



guess what, douche bag, i AM paying attention. that's why it'll never
happen again since we have to tax the rich. that's 'paying attention'

It didn't take long to revert to name-calling, did it?

says the sock puppet

Arguing with a tumbleweed is fun. You never know which way it'll roll
next.

says the guy who thinks it's 1928.

On Sep 1, 6:22*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:00 -0400, JustWait





wrote:
In article ,
says...

A bit over 7 months now.
And thus far no terrorist attacks on the Homeland.
If Obama keeps us safe for 11 more days he'll prove he's a *better man
at protecting the citizens of the United States of America from
massive terrorist attack during the first year in office than was GWB.
Then we go from there to other record settings, for good or bad.
I'm keeping score.

--Vic

Holy ****! That is the 88888888 thing you have ever said.. Fact is,
BinLaden didn't start planning 911 on Jan 20, 01 and you know it...
Please don't step into W3fhs' mold of bumper sticker mentality.

I remember watching the towers come down and the horror of seeing all
those innocent people killed. *I was ****ed that our leadership
allowed that to happen. *Didn't give a thought to Bill Clinton.
If something like that happens again I won't give a thought to GWB.
It'll be on Obama's back. *I won't care if it was planned while GWB
was in office.
Same with the economy. *It's Obama's economy.

uh...,no. you can make up whatever rules you want. you can sit in
blissful denial pretending bush and his spending policies had nothing
to do with our state today. but try walking out a 10th story window.
your denial of the effects of gravity won't save you

I'm not blaming GWB for escalating unemployment.
GWB is gone. *Obama is responsible.

no, he's not. not unless you think a moving train can be stopped by
holding your hand out and saying 'whoa'

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 1, 6:06*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

i did pay attention. me and a hundred million other hard working
middle class americans who thought the rich would, as they said they
would, provide a decent retirement income if we trusted them

you know...like you continue to say we should...

Show me.

I had investments. Still do.

IOW you don't follow the news. you're unaware of what's happened to
the middle class in the past year

Uh, uh, uh, I *am* middle class, and I *have* been around the past
year.

IOW you're a sock puppet for right wing myths.




You blew it. You know it. Now stop your sniveling.]]]

uh no. your friends the rich folks blew it AND they took my money AND
they made me pay for it

My friends are all middle class or lower middle class also. If the
rich took your money, it's because you weren't attending to it. It's
actually kind of funny to read your 'anti-rich' rants.

uh..i AM paying attention. YOU are not. sorry. that's why i know what
the rich did.

Paying attention now is like closing the barn door after the horses
are out. It's too late. You should have paid attention when 'the rich'
took all your money. What a jokester;.


you? you're still waiting for the tooth fairy
]



guess what, douche bag, i AM paying attention. that's why it'll never
happen again since we have to tax the rich. that's 'paying attention'

It didn't take long to revert to name-calling, did it?

says the sock puppet


LMAO!

More names.
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:29:38 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 1, 6:22Â*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:00 -0400, JustWait





wrote:
In article ,
says...

A bit over 7 months now.
And thus far no terrorist attacks on the Homeland.
If Obama keeps us safe for 11 more days he'll prove he's a Â*better man
at protecting the citizens of the United States of America from
massive terrorist attack during the first year in office than was GWB.
Then we go from there to other record settings, for good or bad.
I'm keeping score.

--Vic

Holy ****! That is the 88888888 thing you have ever said.. Fact is,
BinLaden didn't start planning 911 on Jan 20, 01 and you know it...
Please don't step into W3fhs' mold of bumper sticker mentality.

I remember watching the towers come down and the horror of seeing all
those innocent people killed. Â*I was ****ed that our leadership
allowed that to happen. Â*Didn't give a thought to Bill Clinton.
If something like that happens again I won't give a thought to GWB.
It'll be on Obama's back. Â*I won't care if it was planned while GWB
was in office.
Same with the economy. Â*It's Obama's economy.

uh...,no. you can make up whatever rules you want. you can sit in
blissful denial pretending bush and his spending policies had nothing
to do with our state today. but try walking out a 10th story window.
your denial of the effects of gravity won't save you

I'm not blaming GWB for escalating unemployment.
GWB is gone. Â*Obama is responsible.

no, he's not. not unless you think a moving train can be stopped by
holding your hand out and saying 'whoa'

See, I went through this with Eisboch, who somehow ended up putting
the economy on Bush's back, and now with you, from the other side of
the political spectrum.
Bush is gone.
Obama is POTUS.
I didn't say anything about the causes of the current economy.
I'm talking now. The past is gone.
Jesus, quit living in the past.
Past mistakes are only useful in dealing with the here and now.
If Obama has what it takes, he'll fix the economy.
Simple as that.

--Vic