JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.

yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk


spin, spin spin.....

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.

yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk


spin, spin spin.....

Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....

Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....

Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.

Just last month he said he was not going to go back and override the
reviews already done by the DOJ... It's pure politics and it will
backfire, trust me.

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....
Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.

Just last month he said he was not going to go back and override the
reviews already done by the DOJ... It's pure politics and it will
backfire, trust me.


It's ALL politics, what else happens in Washington on BOTH sides of the
fence? Trouble is, it seems as though you don't mind if the
conservatives do it.

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNFT19FC7K.DTL
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....
Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.

Just last month he said he was not going to go back and override the
reviews already done by the DOJ... It's pure politics and it will
backfire, trust me.


It's ALL politics, what else happens in Washington on BOTH sides of the
fence? Trouble is, it seems as though you don't mind if the
conservatives do it.

Yeah, but this time, the American people are the bait...

--
Wafa free since 2009

On Sep 1, 9:34*am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....

Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Test... No, you are not blocked................yet

In article d15b11c3-d7af-4a0a-9336-
,
says...

On Sep 1, 9:34*am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."

Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".

Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk

spin, spin spin.....

Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??

Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Test... No, you are not blocked................yet

Yeah! This version works... I set up my filters to block not only WAFA,
but any replies to anything he posts. Just did a couple of tests and it
seems to be working, the last version let some through. I will keep you
posted, later. RMR.. Home of kiddie racing and all sorts of other
dreams...


--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article d15b11c3-d7af-4a0a-9336-
,
says...
On Sep 1, 9:34 am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:05 -0400, NotNow wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...8/31/MNFT19FC7...
A quote, "President Obama, meanwhile, has said don't worry, the plan
"will be paid for."
Here's the problem. For too many questions, the answer is, "Obama said
so." Obama lies. Even you liberals know that, but you condone it by
saying, "Bush lied".
Obama should not be used for any statements. The appropriate sections
of the act should be quoted.
yeah, remember Obama said "we are by that now, we are looking forward"
in reference to the rebirth of the new investigation of the CIA.. Just
because they have to deflect for Pelosi who lied to congress about
them.... snerk
spin, spin spin.....
Spin ****ing nothing.. He said he was by it, now he is back to it, what
there is spin??
Things change, people change their minds. It's the way things get ironed
out. In my line of work, I change typical details that I've used for
years because things change like design guidelines, etc.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Test... No, you are not blocked................yet

Yeah! This version works... I set up my filters to block not only WAFA,
but any replies to anything he posts. Just did a couple of tests and it
seems to be working, the last version let some through. I will keep you
posted, later. RMR.. Home of kiddie racing and all sorts of other
dreams...



I've got to get mine up and running, Tbird is okay, but not great!