On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Liberals believe this is acceptable behavior toward women if you are a
rich Dem Senator. This goes to the heart of the debate over health
care. Would you trust someone who believes this is acceptable to run
health care? I think a person who could imagine "Teddy" is an ok
person is incapable of making moral judgements and is disqualified for
holding any public office. Why not just have Jeffrey Dahmer as
surgeon general? Since about half the country thinks Kennedy was an
ok guy, I have to conclude there is a serious moral illness afoot in
the USA that renders half the population incapable of moral
judgement. How we got in this situation, I am not sure but I think it
may be that technology wielded by people who are capable of moral
judgement has allowed those with faulty judgement to thrive where
without technology they would have died. Thus, we have liberalism
running the nation. Because we somehow have people who have
demonstrated they do not have the moral judgement that humans should
have running the govt, I do not think the rest of us should accept
this at all and in fact should throw them out by any means necessary.
It is similar to allowing the insane to run the asylum, Somebody has
to exercise judgement and they cannot.

George Washington had an answer;

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain
would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to
subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of
the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the
pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not
trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it
simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation,
for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which
are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us
with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained
without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined
education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both
forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of
religious principle.

It is substantially true that virtue or morality is a necessary spring
of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less
force to every species of free government. Who that is a sincere
friend to it can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the
foundation of the fabric?"

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Aug 29, 1:18*am, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
Liberals believe this is acceptable behavior toward women if you are a
rich Dem Senator. *This goes to the heart of the debate over health
care. *Would you trust someone who believes this is acceptable to run
health care? *I think a person who could imagine "Teddy" is an ok
person is incapable of making moral judgements and is disqualified for
holding any public office. *Why not just have Jeffrey Dahmer as
surgeon general? *Since about half the country thinks Kennedy was an
ok guy, I have to conclude there is a serious moral illness afoot in
the USA that renders half the population incapable of moral
judgement. *How we got in this situation, I am not sure but I think it
may be that technology wielded by people who are capable of moral
judgement has allowed those with faulty judgement to thrive where
without technology they would have died. *Thus, we have liberalism
running the nation. *Because we somehow have people who have
demonstrated they do not have the moral judgement that humans should
have running the govt, I do not think the rest of us should accept
this at all and in fact should throw them out by any means necessary.
It is similar to allowing the insane to run the asylum, Somebody has
to exercise judgement and they cannot.

George Washington had an answer;

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports

well he was half wrong. religion is useless


Where is the security for property, for reputation,
for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which
are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ?

9/11 showed us how useful religion is

On Aug 29, 5:23*am, wf3h wrote:


well he was half wrong. religion is useless



I'm sure that to you, it is.

In article 26ea6ba6-77a6-42fc-b211-64fbfaa8f9e3
@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com, says...

On Aug 29, 5:23*am, wf3h wrote:


well he was half wrong. religion is useless



I'm sure that to you, it is.

The problem is bigoted intolerant assholes like him think if it's got
nothing for them, we shouldn't have access to it either... That is the
way of the liberal, no tolerance for others unless they goosestep to the
liberal mantra...

--
Wafa free since 2009

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:23:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 29, 1:18*am, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
Liberals believe this is acceptable behavior toward women if you are a
rich Dem Senator. *This goes to the heart of the debate over health
care. *Would you trust someone who believes this is acceptable to run
health care? *I think a person who could imagine "Teddy" is an ok
person is incapable of making moral judgements and is disqualified for
holding any public office. *Why not just have Jeffrey Dahmer as
surgeon general? *Since about half the country thinks Kennedy was an
ok guy, I have to conclude there is a serious moral illness afoot in
the USA that renders half the population incapable of moral
judgement. *How we got in this situation, I am not sure but I think it
may be that technology wielded by people who are capable of moral
judgement has allowed those with faulty judgement to thrive where
without technology they would have died. *Thus, we have liberalism
running the nation. *Because we somehow have people who have
demonstrated they do not have the moral judgement that humans should
have running the govt, I do not think the rest of us should accept
this at all and in fact should throw them out by any means necessary.
It is similar to allowing the insane to run the asylum, Somebody has
to exercise judgement and they cannot.

George Washington had an answer;

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports

well he was half wrong. religion is useless


Where is the security for property, for reputation,
for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which
are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ?

9/11 showed us how useful religion is

And borrowing from your 'logical' construct;

The WWII Nipponese medical experiments showed us how useful education
is.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Aug 29, 9:16*am, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:23:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 29, 1:18*am, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Liberals believe this is acceptable behavior toward women if you are a
rich Dem Senator. *This goes to the heart of the debate over health
care. *Would you trust someone who believes this is acceptable to run
health care? *I think a person who could imagine "Teddy" is an ok
person is incapable of making moral judgements and is disqualified for
holding any public office. *Why not just have Jeffrey Dahmer as
surgeon general? *Since about half the country thinks Kennedy was an
ok guy, I have to conclude there is a serious moral illness afoot in
the USA that renders half the population incapable of moral
judgement. *How we got in this situation, I am not sure but I think it
may be that technology wielded by people who are capable of moral
judgement has allowed those with faulty judgement to thrive where
without technology they would have died. *Thus, we have liberalism
running the nation. *Because we somehow have people who have
demonstrated they do not have the moral judgement that humans should
have running the govt, I do not think the rest of us should accept
this at all and in fact should throw them out by any means necessary.
It is similar to allowing the insane to run the asylum, Somebody has
to exercise judgement and they cannot.

George Washington had an answer;

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports

well he was half wrong. religion is useless

Where is the security for property, for reputation,
for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which
are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ?

9/11 showed us how useful religion is

And borrowing from your 'logical' construct;

The WWII Nipponese medical experiments showed us how useful education
is.

ka-ching!