On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:15:49 -0400, NotNow wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:25:18 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
Not really. I'm making a direct comparison, which is certainly a
reasonable
thing to do.

Claiming it's Bush Rationale isn't much of a logical argument, since it
can
be interpreted many different ways.
Justifying Obama's actions by comparing to Bush's actions is making
use of the 'Bush Rationale'.

Don't feel bad. You're in great company. Harry approves.

I can't speak for other people, but I'm not justifying any actions. I'm
making a direct comparison. At the end of 8 (I'm hopeful) years, we can
compare the records more completely. For now, there are some obvious
comparisons possible.

Call it what you will. It is what it is.

"Bush screwed up, therefore Obama's screwups are OK."

Give me a break.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson
Just think, a year ago, it was Clinton screwed up, therefore Bush's
screwups are OK.

Bush's screwup were never OK. Get your head out of the sand.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson