Seeing how most conservatives don't want the government intruding on
private business, I wonder how THIS will spin?

The FTC is going to force companies to stop making robo-call sales
calls......

Damned liberals. Now they want people to be able to enjoy their after
work evenings......

http://www.comcast.net/articles/fina...marketing.Ban/

On Aug 27, 2:18*pm, NotNow wrote:
Seeing how most conservatives don't want the government intruding on
private business, I wonder how THIS will spin?

The FTC is going to force companies to stop making robo-call sales
calls......

Damned liberals. Now they want people to be able to enjoy their after
work evenings......

*http://www.comcast.net/articles/fina....Telemarketing....

You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:18 pm, NotNow wrote:
Seeing how most conservatives don't want the government intruding on
private business, I wonder how THIS will spin?

The FTC is going to force companies to stop making robo-call sales
calls......

Damned liberals. Now they want people to be able to enjoy their after
work evenings......

http://www.comcast.net/articles/fina....Telemarketing...

You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.

There is a big difference in taking over a company because they disagree
with the type of cars they make;
forcing financial institution to make unsound loans to deadbeats for
houses they cannot afford and then not do anything about those loans
when the financial institution chocks on them;
force every body in to government insurance programs that per the
authors own publications will distribute health care based on the age
and condition of the individual. (Even obama said on TV he did not
think a 100 year old woman should have received a pacemaker five years ago)

AND upholding the constitution and prevent companies from intruding on
the private lives of voters.

However since this activity is not specified as a Federal government
activity per the Constitution, it is the states prerogative to deal or
not deal with this issue. I agree with you that the Federal FTC should
but out.

In article , says...

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:18 pm, NotNow wrote:
Seeing how most conservatives don't want the government intruding on
private business, I wonder how THIS will spin?

The FTC is going to force companies to stop making robo-call sales
calls......

Damned liberals. Now they want people to be able to enjoy their after
work evenings......

http://www.comcast.net/articles/fina....Telemarketing...

You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.

There is a big difference in taking over a company because they disagree
with the type of cars they make;
forcing financial institution to make unsound loans to deadbeats for
houses they cannot afford and then not do anything about those loans
when the financial institution chocks on them;
force every body in to government insurance programs that per the
authors own publications will distribute health care based on the age
and condition of the individual. (Even obama said on TV he did not
think a 100 year old woman should have received a pacemaker five years ago)

AND upholding the constitution and prevent companies from intruding on
the private lives of voters.

However since this activity is not specified as a Federal government
activity per the Constitution, it is the states prerogative to deal or
not deal with this issue. I agree with you that the Federal FTC should
but out.

Yeah, I feel the same way but our dem frinds here have already decided
that we don't, simply because that would not suit there rhetoric. I
mean, how dare we sit outside their mold!! Of course reaching across the
isle or compromise is something our present democrat congress and many
liberal Americans don't understand, or don't want to out of pure
elitism... But what the hey, we all know it's Bush's fault that Obama is
a liar surrounded by tax cheats and other crims... convicted or
otherwise...

--
Wafa free since 2009

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:21:00 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


However since this activity is not specified as a Federal government
activity per the Constitution, it is the states prerogative to deal or
not deal with this issue. I agree with you that the Federal FTC should
but out.

It is specifically addressed in the Constitution. Sec. 8 - Powers of
Congress:

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,
and with the Indian Tribes;

Unless those Robo-calls are intrastate, they are under the purview of the
FTC.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.


Quick explanation of why: The adults are back in charge in DC.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.


Quick explanation of why: The adults are back in charge in DC.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Crooked, non believable adults. Obama's credibility is shot. His promise
of 5 days before signing for a bill to be read by the public? Nope. No
lobbiests in his administration? Nope. No Earmarks? Nope. 9000 in one
bill.

In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.


Quick explanation of why: The adults are back in charge in DC.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Crooked, non believable adults. Obama's credibility is shot. His promise
of 5 days before signing for a bill to be read by the public? Nope. No
lobbiests in his administration? Nope. No Earmarks? Nope. 9000 in one
bill.

You are just not allowed here to address the direct lies Obama told to
get elected... Half of the country knew he was full of ****, I mean, one
and one is still two but please, please stop pointing out the direct and
deliberate lies...

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.

Quick explanation of why: The adults are back in charge in DC.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Crooked, non believable adults. Obama's credibility is shot. His promise
of 5 days before signing for a bill to be read by the public? Nope. No
lobbiests in his administration? Nope. No Earmarks? Nope. 9000 in one
bill.

You are just not allowed here to address the direct lies Obama told to
get elected... Half of the country knew he was full of ****, I mean, one
and one is still two but please, please stop pointing out the direct and
deliberate lies...

But, YOU said that Bush was history, therefore irrelevant. What Obama
said is also history, therefore, irrelevant...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
You actually mean the FTC will finally do their job? You mean they
will finally earn their bloated salaries instead of on-the-job-
retirement? I am truly shocked.

Quick explanation of why: The adults are back in charge in DC.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Crooked, non believable adults. Obama's credibility is shot. His promise
of 5 days before signing for a bill to be read by the public? Nope. No
lobbiests in his administration? Nope. No Earmarks? Nope. 9000 in one
bill.

You are just not allowed here to address the direct lies Obama told to
get elected... Half of the country knew he was full of ****, I mean, one
and one is still two but please, please stop pointing out the direct and
deliberate lies...

Take a look at this, seems he's actually doing a pretty damned good job
of keeping his promises:

http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/browse/