nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
Skanky owners. If their people were treated well, they'd have never
sought to unionize in the first place.

It couldn't have been such a bad place to work. If it was the employees
would seek employment elsewhere. That's what you'd do, isn't it?

The assumption on your part that it's possible to find other employment?

Well if the only available employment is "workin at da ca wash" then they
should stop harassing the management and get to work before they get
fired.


So, what you're saying is that if there's no other viable job, then it's ok
for management to exploit the worker? That's certainly not right. It's
called mutual respect, and it works.


Are you serious? flajim doesn't believe in that sort of thing. Anyone
who reads his posts knows that.





--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All