nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...


So, you are lying. At least provided proof.



JustWait touts himself as a network/internet guru, but he can't figure
out how to set up an email/newsgroup reader. What he is...is unemployable.

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.

Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...


So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...


So, you are lying. At least provided proof.


You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did
at 1:48. He did not.

He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually
said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in
favor of."

You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than
try to leave a smoke screen.

H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote:

I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by
anybody who is listening.
Liar, liar, pants on fire.

No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he
were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone
responds to him.

I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR.

You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.

Uh, **** you...




Name calling is what people do when they can't support their firmly held
position, in the face of facts that don't fit.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.

Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...


So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.

Thanks Tom. The guy is already gone but I do hate being called a liar,
by uh, liars...

--
Wafa free since 2009

Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...


So, you are lying. At least provided proof.


You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did
at 1:48. He did not.

He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually
said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in
favor of."

You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than
try to leave a smoke screen.




Now, it's been spun into "death books" by the low-brain-output types.

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...

So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.


COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it?

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...

So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.

COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it?

Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated.

COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html

Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years.

That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD
reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels.

I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to
understand - even for you.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...

So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.

COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it?

Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated.

COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html

Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years.

That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD
reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels.

I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to
understand - even for you.

It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]...
finished business...

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...
So, you are lying. At least provided proof.
You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.
COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it?
Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated.

COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html

Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years.

That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD
reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels.

I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to
understand - even for you.

It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]...
finished business...

There you go, Conservatives = intelligent
Liberals = stupid.