| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
That damned Clinton
Another John wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:29:11 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. Show where Clinton was 'dissed'. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. Clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap ... That's more productive than what the asshole accomlished during his eight years as "president." |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:45:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Another John wrote: On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:29:11 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. Show where Clinton was 'dissed'. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. Clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap ... That's more productive than what the asshole accomlished during his eight years as "president." Man, now I'm really confused. Here you were angry with several of us for allegedly 'dissing' Clinton, and then you go calling him an 'asshole' who accomplished little during his eight years as "president". What the hell do you want? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That damned Clinton
Another John wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:45:02 -0400, NotNow wrote: Another John wrote: On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:29:11 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... wrote: On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0400, NotNow wrote: wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:58 -0400, NotNow wrote: That no good dirty, nasty liberal ******* went to North Korea, and used that damned namby-pamby liberal bull**** called diplomacy and got those journalists released. It was simply a way of giving Lil Kim the photo op with an important American kissing his ass that he demanded without actually sending a government official. I guess Jimmy Carter was busy. Sarah Palin probably would have worked too ... by golly Yeah. We should have just let Kim do anything he wanted with our innocent Americans. We are not really sure what was in the bag, we just know who the bag man was. I imagine we gave them a fat foreign aid package. The lesson reaffirmed was, take hostages or threaten us and the US will pay up. That has been true at least since the Kennedy administration when JFK gave Kruschev everything he wanted to get the missiles out of Cuba, in spite of a lot of gothic theater and saber rattling. And what do you think would have happened if there was a (R) in office? Kim asked specifically for Clinton. Clinton had the fortitude and compassion to help DESPITE what he knew the naysayers would say about him. What has come out here in rec.boats is foolish even on a Harry scale of political one-sidedness. Funny, I haven't seen any "naysayers" here, all supportive. Just want to point out that Obama is God, not Clinton (anymore) so it is reasonable to suspect this meeting was a cold call with nothing predecided... Show me what anybody said that should be considered negative about Clinton in this situation?? Again, just like the reverse of Harry, some find it plausible to dis Clinton but hide it behind a very thin veil of bull****. I'm about sick of it. From both sides. Show where Clinton was 'dissed'. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. Clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap ... That's more productive than what the asshole accomlished during his eight years as "president." Man, now I'm really confused. Here you were angry with several of us for allegedly 'dissing' Clinton, and then you go calling him an 'asshole' who accomplished little during his eight years as "president". What the hell do you want? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. Uh, John, you asked for an example and got one. Don't try to be coy, that's Don's M.O. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Out out damned SPOT! | Cruising | |||
| Damned airboats | General | |||
| Damned gadgets | Cruising | |||
| On Topic: Damned and double damned... | General | |||
| Damned Heat | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
