| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
FWC vs RWC engines
On Jul 31, 6:22*pm, J i m wrote:
wf3h wrote: Is FWC a significant advantage vs RWC? Seems to me it is...I remember seeing the Chesapeake being sucked into my engine at low tide on the Elk River. *Although this would happen to a heat exchanger in a FWC engine, the long term damage of corrosion, etc. seems much less. Is it worth making a decision regarding 2 comparable boats if 1 is FWC vs RWC? Yes. Generally speaking. Also pay attention to everything about the boat. Look for signs of neglect or shoddy maintenance. If everything looks ship shape, chances are the running gear is well taken care of also.. Thanks much...appreciate it. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Boat Engines | Boat Building | |||
| 3.5hp inboard engines | Boat Building | |||
| Lee Engines | Boat Building | |||
| BMC engines | Boat Building | |||
| Engines going out | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
