On Jul 26, 10:35*am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for illustrative purposes



A. Steyn is a butt-buddy of Rush Limbaugh

B. He's been "caught" more times than Limbaugh and Coulter making up "news."

C. It figures you'd quote him.

D. Moron.

Four statements, four classic examples of the ad hominem - two
circumstantial, two abusive. *Textbook stuff.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

He knows the article is spot-on, he has no comeback, so that's all he
can offer. No surprise.

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:36:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 26, 10:35*am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for illustrative purposes



A. Steyn is a butt-buddy of Rush Limbaugh

B. He's been "caught" more times than Limbaugh and Coulter making up "news."

C. It figures you'd quote him.

D. Moron.

Four statements, four classic examples of the ad hominem - two
circumstantial, two abusive. *Textbook stuff.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

He knows the article is spot-on, he has no comeback, so that's all he
can offer. No surprise.

I've noticed that actual refutations are almost non-existent. It's
almost as though the thought is that if you speak it, it's truth. I've
noticed too that most of what is uttered are machinations and
propaganda.

You're right, though. The article is spot-on.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for illustrative purposes



A. Steyn is a butt-buddy of Rush Limbaugh
B. He's been "caught" more times than Limbaugh and Coulter making up "news."
C. It figures you'd quote him.
D. Moron.
Four statements, four classic examples of the ad hominem - two
circumstantial, two abusive. Textbook stuff.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

He knows the article is spot-on, he has no comeback, so that's all he
can offer. No surprise.


snerk

I give all right-wing nutcase commentators (and a couple of posters
here, like you) the same consideration: none. If it comes from Limbaugh,
Coulter, Steyn, Beck, et al, its only purpose is to rouse the rabble on
the far right. It's bull****, but it plays for you, so you think it is
for real.

Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.



--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for illustrative purposes

A. Steyn is a butt-buddy of Rush Limbaugh
B. He's been "caught" more times than Limbaugh and Coulter making up "news."
C. It figures you'd quote him.
D. Moron.
Four statements, four classic examples of the ad hominem - two
circumstantial, two abusive. *Textbook stuff.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

He knows the article is spot-on, he has no comeback, so that's all he
can offer. *No surprise.

*snerk


Really, Herr Krause.

Is that the best that you can do?

On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for illustrative purposes

A. Steyn is a butt-buddy of Rush Limbaugh
B. He's been "caught" more times than Limbaugh and Coulter making up "news."
C. It figures you'd quote him.
D. Moron.
Four statements, four classic examples of the ad hominem - two
circumstantial, two abusive. *Textbook stuff.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

He knows the article is spot-on, he has no comeback, so that's all he
can offer. *No surprise.

*snerk

I give all right-wing nutcase commentators (and a couple of posters
here, like you) the same consideration: none. If it comes from Limbaugh,
Coulter, Steyn, Beck, et al, its only purpose is to rouse the rabble on
the far right. It's bull****, but it plays for you, so you think it is
for real.

Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

Honestly, Herr Krause.

Your infantile arguments are becoming smaller. I think you signature
motto should be:

Veni vidi velcro!

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:18:53 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for brevity

Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

Honestly, Herr Krause.

Your infantile arguments are becoming smaller. I think you signature
motto should be:

Veni vidi velcro!

I came, I saw, I velcroed?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Jul 26, 10:49*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:18:53 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for brevity





Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

Honestly, Herr Krause.

Your infantile arguments are becoming smaller. I think you signature
motto should be:

Veni vidi velcro!

I came, I saw, I velcroed?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

My pardon.

Old elementary latin cliche from way back.

"I came, I saw, I got stuck...."

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:04:12 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 26, 10:49*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:18:53 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for brevity





Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

Honestly, Herr Krause.

Your infantile arguments are becoming smaller. I think you signature
motto should be:

Veni vidi velcro!

I came, I saw, I velcroed?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

My pardon.

Old elementary latin cliche from way back.

"I came, I saw, I got stuck...."

I suppose that's what happened to me. I should have payed more
attention in Latin class...

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Jul 27, 7:02*am, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:04:12 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog



wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:49*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:18:53 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 26, 6:18*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:
On Jul 26, 10:35 am, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:53:52 -0400, H the K
wrote:

snipped for brevity

Your "heros" are aiming at the lowest common denominator...the
JustWaitaFreaks of the GOP.

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

Honestly, Herr Krause.

Your infantile arguments are becoming smaller. I think you signature
motto should be:

Veni vidi velcro!

I came, I saw, I velcroed?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

My pardon.

Old *elementary latin cliche from way back.

"I came, I saw, I got stuck...."

I suppose that's what happened to me. *I should have payed more
attention in Latin class...

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

So should have I.