Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:47:42 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote: Why is it ok for Gates to be insulting, telling an officer who, apparently and to all appearances and reports does not have any race bias at all, that he's a racist and use a degoratory reference to his mother because he's having a bad day - why is that an excuse? I didn't say it was OK but it is not a reason to arrest someone in their own home who was incorrectly suspected of a crime. Big difference. |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "H K" wrote in message ... On 7/23/09 6:54 PM, Eisboch wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Gates on the other hand is an officious Harvard prig who has used his "do you know who I am" attitude in confrontations with airport security at Logan to confrontations with security guards and hospital employees including his own staff. Add to that - his neighbors hate his guts. That's got to tell you something. Cops lying for cops lying for cops lying for cops. What else is new? Harry, your logic circuit breaker tripped again. Reset it, read Tom's post again and try again. Eisboch Tom has a kid who is a cop. Therefore, he is predisposed to believe cops. I am not so predisposed. Forget the cops since you don't trust any. I was talking about this part of Tom's post: "Gates on the other hand is an officious Harvard prig who has used his "do you know who I am" attitude in confrontations with airport security at Logan to confrontations with security guards and hospital employees including his own staff. Add to that - his neighbors hate his guts. That's got to tell you something." You opted to ignore that part. Eisboch His neighbors hate his guts, so one of them called the cops on him when he forgot his keys? White American at it's best, eh? It doesn't matter whether Gates was obnoxious or not. Once the cop realized the guy was in his own house, he should have backed off and left. Maybe the difference here is that you and Tom seem to have great respect for people in uniform and think they deserve deference and respect just because of those uniforms. Well...I do respect firefighters...they wear uniforms. Bad apples in every group. http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pd...ons/tr-141.pdf |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:49:10 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:45:13 -0400, Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:47:02 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:03:55 -0400, NotNow wrote: Richard Weinblatt, director of the Institute for Public Safety at Central Ohio Technical College, said the police sergeant was responsible for defusing the situation once he realized Gates was the lawful occupant. It is not against the law to yell at police, especially in a home, as long as that behavior does not affect an investigation, he said. "That is part of being a police officer in a democratic society," Weinblatt said. "The point is that the police sergeant needs to be the bigger person, take the higher road, be more professional." And that is absolulutely correct. The police need training to back down gracefully, make their apologies and leave once the true situation is known. A certain amount of racial profiling is probably inevitable in police work but professionalism and respect can make the difference in how it is perceived. No offense Wayne, but there has to be something wrong with folks who aren't cops telling cops how to be cops. The officer in question has witnesses, including a responding black officer, who verified his statements. The officer in question has the training in racial profiling and teaches it. He is a decorated officer and has been recognized as one of the best. Gates on the other hand is an officious Harvard prig who has used his "do you know who I am" attitude in confrontations with airport security at Logan to confrontations with security guards and hospital employees including his own staff. Add to that - his neighbors hate his guts. That's got to tell you something. I'm sure that's all true but I still think the cops should have backed off once they knew that he lived there. Well, then we will agree to disagree. :) Now that's a novel approach for this group. What, no nasty name calling? |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:09:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:26:38 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote: "Black students and professors at Harvard have complained for years about racial profiling by Cambridge and campus police. Harvard commissioned an independent committee last year to examine the university's race relations after campus police confronted a young black man who was using tools to remove a bike lock. The man worked at Harvard and owned the bike. Please don't take offense at this, but you know - that's stretching the whole idea of "racial profiling". Police do all kinds of profiling, not just racial/ethnic but also economic. I know, I've been the victim of it a few times. Ha ha, very funny you say, Wayne B, a moderately prosperous white boy with a half decent education the victim of economic profiling? Most definitely, here's a few examples: 1. As a college student I was far from prosperous and used to drive around in older cars, usually well maintained, but not exactly show room fresh shall we say. I used to get stopped on all kind of pretexts, some obviously trumped up, like an allegedly inoperable tail light that some how became operable right after being stopped. It doesn't take too much of that to realize that it's happening to other people also, and it breeds disrespect for the law. 2. As a resident of a very well off community in Westchester County (Larchmont Woods), at one time I used to keep a ratty old Plymouth Duster for driving to the train station. There was always a police officer outside the station directing traffic in the morning. One day the car in front of me made an abrupt stop and I also stopped quickly in a nice orderly fashion. The white Cadillac behind me was not so lucky and had to lock up his tires in a screeching halt to avoid hitting me. The cop looked up to see what the commotion was about and immediately decided that I must have been to blame. He came over to my window ready to read me the riot act or worse. I patiently explained that it was the car behind me (the white Cadillac) that had skidded to a stop. He accepted my answer but said absolutely nothing to the driver of the Caddy. Some of this stuff is the normal "paranoia" or touchiness of human interaction. Some of this stuff is folks taking offense at police authority. They're too "smart" and "important" to be bothered by somebody "dumber" and "not as important." Not saying any of this is fact, but here's a couple possibilities for your cases. In the first example you cite, maybe the cops weren't stopping you to hassle you. When you were a kid, you may have been a suspicious character to the cops. Maybe you looked around too much, or your head was unnaturally motionless. Maybe it happened that a car like yours was just reported to be stolen or involved in a crime or a person fitting your description. Cops key in on these things. In the second incident, maybe the cop profiled your car, but just maybe his ears mistakenly directed his eyes to it. By the time he bought your explanation he had cooled down and shrugged the whole thing off. Cops are human. Anyway, I'm reposting my rules about this, first posted years ago in the rec.autos.driving group when we were talking about cops and tickets. Got it from Mendel. ****** A cop and a driver get together to make most traffic tickets. It can be a complex process but let's concentrate on the prick chromosome of the event, and its dominance. This is a simplification, and there are exceptions, but as a general rule you can bet on it. non-prick driver + non-prick cop = no ticket. non-prick driver + prick cop = ticket prick driver + non-prick cop = ticket prick driver + prick cop = ticket - at least On the surface, that looks a lot worse than it is. Because the vast majority of cops aren't pricks, your odds are really good. I won't go into the times a cop gave me a pass because I simply treated him as I would any one else. Doesn't hurt to be a good schmoozer either. Ran into prick cops twice. Beat both tickets. I got profile-stopped once. I tore down the boiler in my house one evening to clean it. Soot all over. Decided to replace a part. Bathed, and washed my hair with something really strong to get the soot out. Combed my hair straight back and hit the sack. Got out of bed bright and early to get to the parts store. Just tossed on clean work clothes and jumped in my truck. As I'm hitting the stop sign at the end of my street I glance in the rear view mirror and didn't recognize myself. My hair is sticking straight up, and since I just woke up 30 seconds ago my eyes looked like they're propped open with toothpicks or something. Scary. As I stop, a paddy wagon rolls by on the cross street in the direction I'm going, driver on my side. The cop glances at me, looks back ahead then his head spins back at me. Classic double take. I'll never forget it. As I turned behind them the cop is already pulling over and has his arm out the window waving me to stop. Asked if I lived around there and wanted to see my license. Even though I'm usually crabby in the morning, I didn't blame them. I saw myself in the mirror. Looked like a ****ing psycho wacko cult killer. The incident made my day. Another time in '68 I was working in the mills and had a beard, catching up for it being disallowed in the Navy. I got ticketed for backing into an empty street. Technically righteous ticket, but the hippies were rioting downtown at the Dem convention, so the beard nailed it. I could feel it. Human nature. This Henry Gates guy lost his cool. Bad move with a cop. I worked with a lot of black guys at IH who would be Gate's age now. One I talked to a lot and went to the track with set me straight on this profiling. Leroy, and he's probably dead now, or about 80. This was about '69 and he told me he had been stopped on the way to work - west side of Chicago. Wasn't the first time either. I didn't see anything wrong with cops stopping him, since there was a lot of crime going on there. He said, "Vic, I'm here working with you, I go to church, I'm putting 2 of my kids through college, and I don't break the law. You're out drinking every day and carrying on. Are you getting stopped for nothing? What's the difference?" I agreed with him mostly. He was a good man, and there were plenty of racist cops in Chicago. But the larger problem was the crime, and that's a cop's job to handle. If they weren't on their toes on the west side then, the residents would be squawking about racist "lack of police protection." Lots of blacks of Gate's age carry a chip on their shoulder. As the details come out, he don't look too good. That chip will always exacerbate the race issue. When these guys and their white counterparts are gone, much of it will go away with them. Obama surprised me, saying the cops acted stupidly, but at least he was smarter than Gates and didn't call them racist. --Vic |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D.Duck wrote:
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:49:10 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:45:13 -0400, Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:47:02 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:03:55 -0400, NotNow wrote: Richard Weinblatt, director of the Institute for Public Safety at Central Ohio Technical College, said the police sergeant was responsible for defusing the situation once he realized Gates was the lawful occupant. It is not against the law to yell at police, especially in a home, as long as that behavior does not affect an investigation, he said. "That is part of being a police officer in a democratic society," Weinblatt said. "The point is that the police sergeant needs to be the bigger person, take the higher road, be more professional." And that is absolulutely correct. The police need training to back down gracefully, make their apologies and leave once the true situation is known. A certain amount of racial profiling is probably inevitable in police work but professionalism and respect can make the difference in how it is perceived. No offense Wayne, but there has to be something wrong with folks who aren't cops telling cops how to be cops. The officer in question has witnesses, including a responding black officer, who verified his statements. The officer in question has the training in racial profiling and teaches it. He is a decorated officer and has been recognized as one of the best. Gates on the other hand is an officious Harvard prig who has used his "do you know who I am" attitude in confrontations with airport security at Logan to confrontations with security guards and hospital employees including his own staff. Add to that - his neighbors hate his guts. That's got to tell you something. I'm sure that's all true but I still think the cops should have backed off once they knew that he lived there. Well, then we will agree to disagree. :) Now that's a novel approach for this group. What, no nasty name calling? A neighbor who was aware of a break in to Gates' home while he was on vacation sees two guys with backpacks pound in a door on the same house and calls the cops. Cops get there and find a man in the home and ask him for ID. Immediately Gates starts screaming racial crap at the cop, about his mom, etc... Will not hand over ID etc. He said... "Do you know who I am?" "Call the Chief!" uh, "What's the Chief's name?" "I will go outside with your momma." "Why (should I show you ID), because I am a Black man?" Gates is just another racist asshole, known for throwing his "weight" around. What he really needs is a good ass kickin'... |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 6:38*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:00:22 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: I get scolded for snapping at an alarm company salesman. I snap at telemarketers all the time, and get scolded, but there's a big difference between a scolding and an arrest. * :-) * I've had to exercise a lot of self restraint with the airport security folks at times. *That's probably about the closest thing to a police state that I ever hope to encounter. I have difficulty snagging a live tele-marketer to snap to anymore. *sigh* the world of automated market calling.... |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just wait a frekin' minute! wrote:
Gates is just another racist asshole, known for throwing his "weight" around. What he really needs is a good ass kickin'... Moron. -- A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... I have no doubt that there is plenty of culpability on the part of Gates applying normal standards of behavior and decorum. The cops however, once realizing that they'd made an honest mistake, should have let it go. Although it would have been nice if Gates had shown a little restraint on his part, he was probably already a bit out of sorts even before the police arrived from the 20 hour flight, arriving home to find himself locked out, etc. Who knows what else may have gone wrong for him that day? There's plenty of opportunity for that when you are traveling. I get scolded for snapping at an alarm company salesman. Eisboch That's because the person who scolded you is an idiot, and is just trying to stir ****. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:06:00 -0400, H the K
wrote: What? That I'd shoot someone that busted into my house? That's not a "plan to shoot someone." That's just part of a household defense mechanism to protect the lives here. Having a home defence gun is not a bad idea, essential if you live in the country. However, if money is short for things like fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, not to mention flu shots, get a cheap used gun. A single shot 12 ga, with a short, but still legal, 19 inch barrel. If you want to go after Bambi, a scope, from the recreation budget, is a good idea. Casady |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:06:00 -0400, H the K wrote: What? That I'd shoot someone that busted into my house? That's not a "plan to shoot someone." That's just part of a household defense mechanism to protect the lives here. Having a home defence gun is not a bad idea, essential if you live in the country. However, if money is short for things like fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, not to mention flu shots, get a cheap used gun. A single shot 12 ga, with a short, but still legal, 19 inch barrel. If you want to go after Bambi, a scope, from the recreation budget, is a good idea. Casady He lives in a questionable area, perhaps. Also, being such a lying, insulting, vulgar ass he's ****ed off so many people that he has to answer his door with a gun. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Thomas Crown Affair | ASA | |||
The Vets' Case - A detailed analysis of the Swift Boat affair | ASA |