![]() |
More fun with Sarah
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:35:43 -0500, Vic Smith wrote:
Nobody has really explained why we went to Afghanistan in the first place or why we are still there. I'll explain it, as I remember it. We went in to get Osama Bin Laden. Lest we all forget, the Taliban offered up Bin Laden on several occasions. Not that I blame Bush for rejecting the offer. After 9/11, we all wanted blood, myself included, but then, who would have thought that 8 years later, bin Laden would still be breathing free air. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001...an.terrorism11 |
More fun with Sarah
thunder wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:35:43 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Nobody has really explained why we went to Afghanistan in the first place or why we are still there. I'll explain it, as I remember it. We went in to get Osama Bin Laden. Lest we all forget, the Taliban offered up Bin Laden on several occasions. Not that I blame Bush for rejecting the offer. After 9/11, we all wanted blood, myself included, but then, who would have thought that 8 years later, bin Laden would still be breathing free air. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001...an.terrorism11 If there was one thing the Bush misadministration mishandled perfectly, it was dealing with other nations, governments, and organizations. Besides, it *wanted* a war of convenience. Convenient, wasn't it? :) |
More fun with Sarah
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:51:11 -0400, HK wrote:
thunder wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:35:43 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Nobody has really explained why we went to Afghanistan in the first place or why we are still there. I'll explain it, as I remember it. We went in to get Osama Bin Laden. Lest we all forget, the Taliban offered up Bin Laden on several occasions. Not that I blame Bush for rejecting the offer. After 9/11, we all wanted blood, myself included, but then, who would have thought that 8 years later, bin Laden would still be breathing free air. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001...an.terrorism11 If there was one thing the Bush misadministration mishandled perfectly, it was dealing with other nations, governments, and organizations. Besides, it *wanted* a war of convenience. Convenient, wasn't it? :) If you wants a war, you gots to have an enemy. It would have been very inconvenient to have captured Osama. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com