![]() |
More fun with Sarah
On Jul 7, 9:02*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:PMCdnSxy6dLdps7XnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@earthlink. com... I guess that's hard for you and others here to understand. Oh...speaking of Sarah, I suppose she and her lawyer have never heard of New York Times v. Sullivan. Elected public officials, basically, cannot use the courts effectively to attempt to chill criticism or reportage about how they handle their jobs. You really need a new angle. * There's a difference between legality and common decency. Those of the extreme left persuasion are walking away from the difference. Eisboch Uh...the point here is that Sarah and her legal beagle last saturday threatened a reporter specifically with a lawsuit and other news organizations generally with lawsuits if they reported there were "rumors" floating around about her and potential legal problems. That's the "legality" here. Palin doesn't even have a stump to stand on in attempting to chill such reportage. Perhaps if she calmed down some, and stopped playing "poor, poor pitiful me" and the perpetual victim, she wouldn't be so obviously earning the reputation as a nutcase she now has. You know, if the internet had been around in the days of Joe McCarthy, he would have lasted about a week. It's important to stomp political demogogues into the ground, over and over and over and over, until they show no possibilities of being revived for future political games. Palin is a demogogue. Yada, yada, yada. You have fun. *I have to go put the charger on the VW bus, then go sell some guitars. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll bet the bus looks cool as hell in front of your vintage guitar shop! |
More fun with Sarah
On Jul 7, 7:26*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Captain Marvel of Woodstock wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality, effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and smart, but... She's also a hunter, fisherman, Pro-Lifer, gun advocate which is everything they hate - in particular the Pro-Life thing. And she had the audacity to actually give birth to what they consider a defective human being. Guys like Jon and Harry are Nazi's when it comes to challenged or physically handicapped children - eugenisists actually. Just as bad as Goering or Hitler or Spangler. They don't see value in "defective" children - they consider them "mistakes" and some how not worthy of life. Both of them are very sad bitter men. Unfortunate. Wow...you really swallowed the 8' asparagus, eh? Using your terms, I would charactize her as having an extremely flawed personality, ineffective leadership abilities, being a bad mother, and being no better than average looking. I've not seen any indicator she is smart. She's better than ok, though, delivering a teleprompted speech, but she sure as hell is lost in space without a script. Yet, you remain infatuated by her, cutting and pasting media articles on almost a daily basis. Once again, my interest in Palin is in seeing she remains an anchor dragging down the GOP ship of state, as it were. Herr Krause. You're interest in Governor Palin is that she gives you nocturnal emissions. That's why you are infatuated with her. If she isn't in the news, you have no more wet dreams. |
More fun with Sarah
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, Eisboch wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? Nothing for nothing, but she is a potential Presidential candidate. I would expect media coverage of her, especially when she does something as unusual as resigning in mid-term. Did you have a problem when Obama quit being a Senator to run for President? I mean, just because he didn't make an honest announcement, doesn't mean he kept the job.. As for those 16 ethics complaints, one of which she filed against herself, they haven't all been without foundation. She did have to repay moneys for her children's travel. A minor offense I'll grant you, but most of the complaints are the result of political infighting in one of our more dysfunctional and corrupt states. Still, none of this would be news worthy on a national level, if she wasn't a potential Presidential candidate. |
More fun with Sarah
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 7, 6:52 am, HK wrote: Captain Marvel of Woodstock wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality, effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and smart, but... She's also a hunter, fisherman, Pro-Lifer, gun advocate which is everything they hate - in particular the Pro-Life thing. And she had the audacity to actually give birth to what they consider a defective human being. Guys like Jon and Harry are Nazi's when it comes to challenged or physically handicapped children - eugenisists actually. Just as bad as Goering or Hitler or Spangler. They don't see value in "defective" children - they consider them "mistakes" and some how not worthy of life. Both of them are very sad bitter men. Unfortunate. Wow...you really swallowed the 8' asparagus, eh? Herr Krause. 8" nor asparagus isn't close to what you have swallowed. Think "Stumpy".. and the testosterone filled weekend at the private island with the big guns... |
More fun with Sarah
JustWait wrote:
thunder wrote: On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, Eisboch wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? Nothing for nothing, but she is a potential Presidential candidate. I would expect media coverage of her, especially when she does something as unusual as resigning in mid-term. Did you have a problem when Obama quit being a Senator to run for President? I mean, just because he didn't make an honest announcement, doesn't mean he kept the job.. As for those 16 ethics complaints, one of which she filed against herself, they haven't all been without foundation. She did have to repay moneys for her children's travel. A minor offense I'll grant you, but most of the complaints are the result of political infighting in one of our more dysfunctional and corrupt states. Still, none of this would be news worthy on a national level, if she wasn't a potential Presidential candidate. Uh...Obama did not quit his job as U.S. Senator nor did he quit "being a U.S. Senator" to run for a higher office. He remained in the Senate. BTW, is Palin running for higher office? I must have missed that announcement. |
More fun with Sarah
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:12:59 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:31:27 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:11:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:uJKdnfxCzo7GNs_XnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthli nk.com... Palin Hit With Another Ethics Complaint Yawn. When will they stop? Batting average isn't very good. Even the FBI acknowledged that one of the allegations that may have violated a Federal statute was meaningless and without merit. And people wonder why she quit. She should have stood at the microphone, looked straight at the camera and given the media a one finger salute. Eisboch "The Media." Right. As if she didn't bring any of this on herself. So much for "personal responsibility." Given some of your posts of late, I don't consider you to be much of an expert on "personal responsibility". Screaming at a TV set in a fit of rage , using acute profanity in front of your kids and then bragging about here it isn't my kind of adult personal responsibilty. A thought while you are furiously typing your response ..... tough ****. Eisboch I suppose you never swore in front of your children. Nor did you ever yell at the television. You're just the picture of personal responsiblity, Dick. Of course I have done both. But never with the type of vulgar profanity you boast about. I have a degree of personal responsibility, you see. I am not a prude by any means, but I have more respect for people in general, my family and for myself to publically utter the type of vulgarity you seem to have no problem with. You must be a real trip in the conference room. Eisboch Vulgarity is in the eyes of the beholder. In my eyes vulgarity is sending kids to die in a war of choice. Dick Cheney is a vulgar person who rightly deserves my hatred. I hate him. He's an evil ******* who cares nothing for the people he's ****ed, apart from Scooter Libby. That's vulgarity, Dick. You were among the rah rah chorus of vulgarity that happened on our watch. You're among the selfish, vulgar citizenry who'd deny another medical care for 2% of your wages. You've said as much in your critiques of Obama's "out of control spending." That's vulgarity, Dick. My vulgarity is reserved for those who think others are less deserving than themselves, since they're successful and others had the same opportunities and choices. Unfortunately the world doesn't work in such a binary fashion and some people get screwed no matter their desire, fortitude, earnestness, willingness, indiustry, etc. To deny them health care is vulgar. That's vulgarity, Dick. |
More fun with Sarah
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:02:41 -0400, Captain Marvel of Woodstock
wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality, effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and smart, but... "Friends with a domestic terrorist" Said how many times? 20 - 30 - 40? Whips people into a frenzy and then says nothing when the audience suggests killing Obama? Extorts money from the state to pay for things that clearly aren't kosher expenses by any measure. That's not a woman I admire. She makes me sick. |
More fun with Sarah
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:58:00 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Gene Robinson, the Pulitzer-winning editor at the Post, pretty much nailed it: A Starter, Not a Finisher By Eugene Robinson Tuesday, July 7, 2009 I liked Eugene Robinson a lot until he became a regular contributor on Olbermann's show. He talks one way on Morning Joe and other media outlets and an entirely different way when he's with Olbermann. He's losing credibility, Pulitzer prize or not. Eisboch And so you dismiss the message he writes in Palin being a quitter? Easy way out. Just like her. |
More fun with Sarah
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:02:41 -0400, Captain Marvel of Woodstock
wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: What are you liberals so worried about? She's everything they claim they like in women - strong personality, effective leadership, mother, interesting life story, good looking and smart, but... She's also a hunter, fisherman, Pro-Lifer, gun advocate which is everything they hate - in particular the Pro-Life thing. And she had the audacity to actually give birth to what they consider a defective human being. Guys like Jon and Harry are Nazi's when it comes to challenged or physically handicapped children - eugenisists actually. Just as bad as Goering or Hitler or Spangler. They don't see value in "defective" children - they consider them "mistakes" and some how not worthy of life. Both of them are very sad bitter men. Unfortunate. YMML. A crock of ****, stewed in your demented cranium. WTF are you talking about with handicapped children? You're insane. |
More fun with Sarah
jps wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:12:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:31:27 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:11:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Palin Hit With Another Ethics Complaint Yawn. When will they stop? Batting average isn't very good. Even the FBI acknowledged that one of the allegations that may have violated a Federal statute was meaningless and without merit. And people wonder why she quit. She should have stood at the microphone, looked straight at the camera and given the media a one finger salute. Eisboch "The Media." Right. As if she didn't bring any of this on herself. So much for "personal responsibility." Given some of your posts of late, I don't consider you to be much of an expert on "personal responsibility". Screaming at a TV set in a fit of rage , using acute profanity in front of your kids and then bragging about here it isn't my kind of adult personal responsibilty. A thought while you are furiously typing your response ..... tough ****. Eisboch I suppose you never swore in front of your children. Nor did you ever yell at the television. You're just the picture of personal responsiblity, Dick. Of course I have done both. But never with the type of vulgar profanity you boast about. I have a degree of personal responsibility, you see. I am not a prude by any means, but I have more respect for people in general, my family and for myself to publically utter the type of vulgarity you seem to have no problem with. You must be a real trip in the conference room. Eisboch Vulgarity is in the eyes of the beholder. In my eyes vulgarity is sending kids to die in a war of choice. Dick Cheney is a vulgar person who rightly deserves my hatred. I hate him. He's an evil ******* who cares nothing for the people he's ****ed, apart from Scooter Libby. That's vulgarity, Dick. You were among the rah rah chorus of vulgarity that happened on our watch. You're among the selfish, vulgar citizenry who'd deny another medical care for 2% of your wages. You've said as much in your critiques of Obama's "out of control spending." That's vulgarity, Dick. My vulgarity is reserved for those who think others are less deserving than themselves, since they're successful and others had the same opportunities and choices. Unfortunately the world doesn't work in such a binary fashion and some people get screwed no matter their desire, fortitude, earnestness, willingness, indiustry, etc. To deny them health care is vulgar. That's vulgarity, Dick. Right on...the real vulgarity is sending soldiers off to die in a war of convenience, or denying poor people health care, food, shelter, or a decent education for their kids. THAT is vulgarity. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com