"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

Haven't you noticed? Vic's on HK's team, although he tries to make it
seem as though he's not. This type of discussion makes him
nervous. :-)

Nah, I'm not even reading the political crap, or the slagging.
Gave it up mostly.
Got the TV left and right morons for that.
Don't need the boat morons putting me on teams or saying stuff I'm not
even reading makes me nervous. That's just crazy talk.
Knowing this group's childish dynamics pretty well, I did momentarily
think some lame-ass with Harryitis might impute something into my
motives for interrupting Froggy's politics to talk about boats, and
not interrupting Harry's politics. Congratulations.
Fact is, I just like talking to Froggy more than Harry.
Froggy is an accomplished inventor, a boat-builder, and a successful
businessman. Florida native too, family oriented, and has some
interesting insights. I try to catch him when I can.
Harry is sometimes interesting, and no doubt famous and renowned - on
rec.boats.
Not that I'm knocking Harry.
Like I once told Loogy, I'll tell you.
That's your ****ing job, and don't you forget it. Carry on.
Harry is waiting for you.

--Vic


Well said!

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:23:57 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

Haven't you noticed? Vic's on HK's team, although he tries to make it
seem as though he's not. This type of discussion makes him
nervous. :-)

Nah, I'm not even reading the political crap, or the slagging.
Gave it up mostly.
Got the TV left and right morons for that.
Don't need the boat morons putting me on teams or saying stuff I'm not
even reading makes me nervous. That's just crazy talk.
Knowing this group's childish dynamics pretty well, I did momentarily
think some lame-ass with Harryitis might impute something into my
motives for interrupting Froggy's politics to talk about boats, and
not interrupting Harry's politics. Congratulations.
Fact is, I just like talking to Froggy more than Harry.
Froggy is an accomplished inventor, a boat-builder, and a successful
businessman. Florida native too, family oriented, and has some
interesting insights. I try to catch him when I can.
Harry is sometimes interesting, and no doubt famous and renowned - on
rec.boats.
Not that I'm knocking Harry.
Like I once told Loogy, I'll tell you.
That's your ****ing job, and don't you forget it. Carry on.
Harry is waiting for you.

--Vic


Well said!

oh, ****.

Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:
Haven't you noticed? Vic's on HK's team, although he tries to make it
seem as though he's not. This type of discussion makes him
nervous. :-)

Nah, I'm not even reading the political crap, or the slagging.
Gave it up mostly.
Got the TV left and right morons for that.
Don't need the boat morons putting me on teams or saying stuff I'm not
even reading makes me nervous. That's just crazy talk.
Knowing this group's childish dynamics pretty well, I did momentarily
think some lame-ass with Harryitis might impute something into my
motives for interrupting Froggy's politics to talk about boats, and
not interrupting Harry's politics. Congratulations.
Fact is, I just like talking to Froggy more than Harry.
Froggy is an accomplished inventor, a boat-builder, and a successful
businessman. Florida native too, family oriented, and has some
interesting insights. I try to catch him when I can.
Harry is sometimes interesting, and no doubt famous and renowned - on
rec.boats.
Not that I'm knocking Harry.
Like I once told Loogy, I'll tell you.
That's your ****ing job, and don't you forget it. Carry on.
Harry is waiting for you.

--Vic


Jack off is sliding into my Do Not Resuscitate bin.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Obama was essentially silent while Iranian religious thugs were
killing people with axes but when the Supreme Court of Honduras
removes the pres there for violation of his constitutional duties, he
condemns it. I s'pose we have no worries about Honduras sending
jihadis to cause us problems.
All you have to do is read the Honduran constitution and you will see
that what was done was not only legal but that the president seriously
violated it.


Obama was not silent, essentially or otherwise, during the Iranian
election fiasco. What he did not do was behave stupidly, as your heroes
Bush and Cheney would have done. Your repeating this right-wing, neocon
nonsense does not make it so.

Conservatives have a strong record of diplomacy over the past 8 years,
or should I say lack?

Why would you doubt their swashbuckling ways? Didn't it work out well
for them in the 2008 elections? Mavericky statesman and his comely
bespeckled flight attendant maverick in waiting.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:58:29 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

Haven't you noticed? Vic's on HK's team, although he tries to make it
seem as though he's not. This type of discussion makes him
nervous. :-)

Be nice to Jack.

He was the last guy picked by the conservative team because he throws
like a girl.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Obama was essentially silent while Iranian religious thugs were
killing people with axes but when the Supreme Court of Honduras
removes the pres there for violation of his constitutional duties, he
condemns it. I s'pose we have no worries about Honduras sending
jihadis to cause us problems.
All you have to do is read the Honduran constitution and you will see
that what was done was not only legal but that the president seriously
violated it.

Obama was not silent, essentially or otherwise, during the Iranian
election fiasco. What he did not do was behave stupidly, as your heroes
Bush and Cheney would have done. Your repeating this right-wing, neocon
nonsense does not make it so.

Conservatives have a strong record of diplomacy over the past 8 years,
or should I say lack?

Why would you doubt their swashbuckling ways? Didn't it work out well
for them in the 2008 elections? Mavericky statesman and his comely
bespeckled flight attendant maverick in waiting.


Other than increasing funding to take on aids, I can't think of one
thing the Bush-Cheney Administration did properly. No wonder the
righties liked them so much.

On Jun 29, 9:40*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Obama was essentially silent while Iranian religious thugs were
killing people with axes but when the Supreme Court of Honduras
removes the pres there for violation of his constitutional duties, he
condemns it. *I s'pose we have no worries about Honduras sending
jihadis to cause us problems.
All you have to do is read the Honduran constitution and you will see
that what was done was not only legal but that the president seriously
violated it.

Obama was not silent, essentially or otherwise, during the Iranian
election fiasco. What he did not do was behave stupidly, as your heroes
Bush and Cheney would have done. Your repeating this right-wing, neocon
nonsense does not make it so.

Conservatives have a strong record of diplomacy over the past 8 years,
or should I say lack?

Why would you doubt their swashbuckling ways? *Didn't it work out well
for them in the 2008 elections? *Mavericky statesman and his comely
bespeckled flight attendant maverick in waiting.

Other than increasing funding to take on aids, I can't think of one
thing the Bush-Cheney Administration did properly. No wonder the
righties liked them so much.

OK Vic, you've shamed me out of posting more political stuff. I am
still ****ed about this though.
Frogwatch

HK wrote:

Harry is sometimes interesting, and no doubt famous and renowned - on
rec.boats.
--Vic


Harry, did you miss this part. Your claim to fame is rec.boats.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Jun 29, 9:40*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Obama was essentially silent while Iranian religious thugs were
killing people with axes but when the Supreme Court of Honduras
removes the pres there for violation of his constitutional duties, he
condemns it. *I s'pose we have no worries about Honduras sending
jihadis to cause us problems.
All you have to do is read the Honduran constitution and you will see
that what was done was not only legal but that the president seriously
violated it.

Obama was not silent, essentially or otherwise, during the Iranian
election fiasco. What he did not do was behave stupidly, as your heroes
Bush and Cheney would have done. Your repeating this right-wing, neocon
nonsense does not make it so.

Conservatives have a strong record of diplomacy over the past 8 years,
or should I say lack?

Why would you doubt their swashbuckling ways? *Didn't it work out well
for them in the 2008 elections? *Mavericky statesman and his comely
bespeckled flight attendant maverick in waiting.

Other than increasing funding to take on aids, I can't think of one
thing the Bush-Cheney Administration did properly. No wonder the
righties liked them so much.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

While I didn't care for the way Bush handled a lot of things, I can
prove Harry is full of **** on this one, too. Bush did many things
that I think were good things.
Passed legislation requiring states to conduct criminal background
checks on prospective foster and adoptive parents.
Increased small business incentives to expand and to hire new people.
Passed tough new laws to hold corporate criminals to account as a
result of corporate scandals.
Provided $20 million to states to help people with disabilities work
from home
Created a fund to encourage technologies that help the disabled.
Grant a complete tax exemption for prepaid or college tuition savings
plans.
Established a $2.4 billion fund to help states implement teacher
accountability systems.

So, he did do several good things.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:26:40 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Jun 29, 9:40*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:54:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Obama was essentially silent while Iranian religious thugs were
killing people with axes but when the Supreme Court of Honduras
removes the pres there for violation of his constitutional duties, he
condemns it. *I s'pose we have no worries about Honduras sending
jihadis to cause us problems.
All you have to do is read the Honduran constitution and you will see
that what was done was not only legal but that the president seriously
violated it.

Obama was not silent, essentially or otherwise, during the Iranian
election fiasco. What he did not do was behave stupidly, as your heroes
Bush and Cheney would have done. Your repeating this right-wing, neocon
nonsense does not make it so.

Conservatives have a strong record of diplomacy over the past 8 years,
or should I say lack?

Why would you doubt their swashbuckling ways? *Didn't it work out well
for them in the 2008 elections? *Mavericky statesman and his comely
bespeckled flight attendant maverick in waiting.

Other than increasing funding to take on aids, I can't think of one
thing the Bush-Cheney Administration did properly. No wonder the
righties liked them so much.

OK Vic, you've shamed me out of posting more political stuff. I am
still ****ed about this though.
Frogwatch

That didn't last long, did it?