Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 28, 10:24*am, TinyTim wrote:
.... the high incidence of new model Mercruiser starters *early failure *is endemic to the pervasive *decline in business management ethics and general skill. *If these folks do not get on board with Edwards Deming precepts...every body loses.....country .....customers and labor. * My son in law had to remove his motor starter after 150 hours of little use. *I saw it. *I could not believe the inferior construction of the brush holders. Tin parts installed in a tin can design. *I heard rumors Mallory is running full tilt *as people wise up to Mercury's inferior OEM network and *then switch to Mallory. I hope that is fact. *But the cost of labor to remove and replace an I/O starter is huge as many of you know. . Mercruiser has become elligible for inclusion in the most destructively managed U.S. corporations... the dirty dozen. I wonder if Bombardier will fix OMC and then try to straighten out Mercury Marine? *If only Kiekhaefer could rise from the grave. Unbridled greed and no respect for *their customers, *dominates too many American businesses and institutions. * Mercury Marine has joined that nefarious club.... and boaters have to suffer accordingly. I believe the starter motor in question is one of these, and yes, they are crap. http://www.allpointsmarineco.com/view/8066/333339/ way over priced (to the consumer) and really slop-shoddy construction. They copied a poor design and made it worse. As cheap as these starters are built. Mercruiser is probably paying the swami's as little as $19.99 on like a 30,000 piece contract. "Hey! It made IT's warrenty, wadda you griping about, eh" Penitenziagite! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercury Marine 5.7 liter | General | |||
the dirty button rarely jumps Martha, it joins Fred instead | ASA | |||
Mercury Marine 470 / 3.7 Liter | General | |||
You and a dozen others | General |