Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 28, 2:57*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:55:40 -0400, HK wrote: Who makes Evinrude? Not Evinrude. The brand name is just an asset bought on the cheap. I know the pre-bankruptsy Evinrude 4 strokes were Suzuki. The strange thing is Suzuki has a fairly good name but the Evinrudes really sucked. They had a 2 for 2 failure rate in the 2 neighbors I knew who had them. Both had corrosion problems that led to catastrophic power head failures. 'Zukes and Yamahas are the outboard power of choice, I think, with Mercs third. In the good old days, when my dad was a boat dealer, Evinrudes and Johnsons had the best reps for corrosion resistance, and Mercs were a distant third. Merc, my dad said, passed the OMC products in the mid to late 1960's in that regard. I don't know if that was the case, but it was my dad's opinion. I do know that Merc used a lot more aluminum in the 1950s and 1960s than OMC... Seeing how Harry was proven wrong ie: Mallory starters, I wondered how long it would take for the thread to evolve into yet another series of lies about Harry's father. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 28, 12:46*pm, Gene wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Jun 28, 10:24*am, TinyTim wrote: .... the high incidence of new model Mercruiser starters *early failure *is endemic to the pervasive *decline in business management ethics and general skill. *If these folks do not get on board with Edwards Deming precepts...every body loses.....country .....customers and labor. * My son in law had to remove his motor starter after 150 hours of little use. *I saw it. *I could not believe the inferior construction of the brush holders. Tin parts installed in a tin can design. *I heard rumors Mallory is running full tilt *as people wise up to Mercury's inferior OEM network and *then switch to Mallory. I hope that is fact. *But the cost of labor to remove and replace an I/O starter is huge as many of you know. . Which year of starters are you refering to? usually the early *(Delco 8 & 10 MT) marine units were heavy but cheap to fix. *then later on the gear reductions came out. The first models made in Korea were the same as on an 80's Chevy s-10 and weren't much to brag about concerning power, *and repairs were costly like the rest of the unit. Now the new series is *little gear reduction which is a Mitsubishi knock-off which is made in India for pity sakes. But the Delco PM/260 is the way to go. they work well on anything from a 3.0 up to a GM 503 CID. Both automotive and marine. But regardless, ALL starters are prone to humidity and a lot of people will let the bilge fill up to where the starter motor is baptized even for a moment, then the corrosion begins. But even if kept dry, just the humidity in the bilge will keep the starter damp and the rust starts happening. BTW, you say people are switching to Mallory? Mallory what? Mallory doesn't make a starter. Mallory advertises that they are suppliers to OEMs (Including Mercury). Could it be that the subject starter is actually a Chinese knock-off? -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Could be, Gene. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 28, 10:24*am, TinyTim wrote:
.... the high incidence of new model Mercruiser starters *early failure *is endemic to the pervasive *decline in business management ethics and general skill. *If these folks do not get on board with Edwards Deming precepts...every body loses.....country .....customers and labor. * My son in law had to remove his motor starter after 150 hours of little use. *I saw it. *I could not believe the inferior construction of the brush holders. Tin parts installed in a tin can design. *I heard rumors Mallory is running full tilt *as people wise up to Mercury's inferior OEM network and *then switch to Mallory. I hope that is fact. *But the cost of labor to remove and replace an I/O starter is huge as many of you know. . Mercruiser has become elligible for inclusion in the most destructively managed U.S. corporations... the dirty dozen. I wonder if Bombardier will fix OMC and then try to straighten out Mercury Marine? *If only Kiekhaefer could rise from the grave. Unbridled greed and no respect for *their customers, *dominates too many American businesses and institutions. * Mercury Marine has joined that nefarious club.... and boaters have to suffer accordingly. I believe the starter motor in question is one of these, and yes, they are crap. http://www.allpointsmarineco.com/view/8066/333339/ way over priced (to the consumer) and really slop-shoddy construction. They copied a poor design and made it worse. As cheap as these starters are built. Mercruiser is probably paying the swami's as little as $19.99 on like a 30,000 piece contract. "Hey! It made IT's warrenty, wadda you griping about, eh" Penitenziagite! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercury Marine 5.7 liter | General | |||
the dirty button rarely jumps Martha, it joins Fred instead | ASA | |||
Mercury Marine 470 / 3.7 Liter | General | |||
You and a dozen others | General |