Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go
about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? A lot of water rushing to one side...that'll do for starters. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? If we assume the boat has feelings, you being on deck. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Momentum of water, amount of water, vertical center of gravity, how steep the Vee is, what the sea state is, how many people and located where - whole host of factors, the primes being Vcog, Vee and sea state. A swamped boat will stay upright in reasonable seas, but if you had been moving in the ditch (the bottom point or trough, between two waves) which is a completely insane idea in a small boat). Decreasing the amount of top weight doesn't always translate to decreasing the Vcog either. Increasing the beam of a boat doesn't necessarily mean the boat automatically becomes more stable either depending on how steep the Vee is. It's more the shape of the hull, the type of hull (modified Vee vs Deep Vee) and it's draft that determine stability. If you design a boat with a moderate or semi-vee the boat will tend to ride flatter on the surface which means that in a heavy sea state it will pound or if you are unfortunate enough to get into a heavy following sea or quartering waves when transiting actually cause more pitch and yaw which can be very uncomfortable. On the other hand, a steeper Vee adds in the roll component and now your dealing with roll, pitch and yaw and that's also dangerous. It's a guessing game in a lot of ways in particular if you are modifying a plan that has some merit to it as it stands. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 7:22*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? *Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Momentum of water, amount of water, vertical center of gravity, how steep the Vee is, what the sea state is, how many people and located where - whole host of factors, the primes being Vcog, Vee and sea state. A swamped boat will stay upright in reasonable seas, but if you had been moving in the ditch (the bottom point or trough, between two waves) which is a completely insane idea in a small boat). Decreasing the amount of top weight doesn't always translate to decreasing the Vcog either. Increasing the beam of a boat doesn't necessarily mean the boat automatically becomes more stable either depending on how steep the Vee is. It's more the shape of the hull, the type of hull (modified Vee vs Deep Vee) and it's draft that determine stability. If you design a boat with a moderate or semi-vee the boat will tend to ride flatter on the surface which means that in a heavy sea state it will pound or if you are unfortunate enough to get into a heavy following sea or quartering waves when transiting actually cause more pitch and yaw which can be very uncomfortable. On the other hand, a steeper Vee adds in the roll component and now your dealing with roll, pitch and yaw and that's also dangerous. It's a guessing game in a lot of ways in particular if you are modifying a plan that has some merit to it as it stands. OK. lets consider a boat that has swamped but has a deck with floatation below the deck. I think that in many (most?) cases she may continue to swamp. How will she float if the water cannot get out? How do we arrange subsequent floatation to minimize probability of capsize? A cubic foot of floatation on the gunnels will give 57 lbs of upward force if we try to immerse it in the water. Say we have 10 cubic feet for a total of 570 lbs of upward force on each gunnel. That is a lot of force and we may need a lot less. This seems to indicate that we should have floatation not only under the deck but under the gunnels. Would we be better with most floatation under the gunnels and no deck so we actually stand on the bottom of the boat as in my current Tolman (she has floatation in the bow and stern floatation tanks too). This would lower the COG further minimizing the risk of capsize and getting enough floatation on the gunnels so she cannot turn over even when swamped. Thoughts? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:19:51 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jun 24, 7:22*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? *Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Momentum of water, amount of water, vertical center of gravity, how steep the Vee is, what the sea state is, how many people and located where - whole host of factors, the primes being Vcog, Vee and sea state. A swamped boat will stay upright in reasonable seas, but if you had been moving in the ditch (the bottom point or trough, between two waves) which is a completely insane idea in a small boat). Decreasing the amount of top weight doesn't always translate to decreasing the Vcog either. Increasing the beam of a boat doesn't necessarily mean the boat automatically becomes more stable either depending on how steep the Vee is. It's more the shape of the hull, the type of hull (modified Vee vs Deep Vee) and it's draft that determine stability. If you design a boat with a moderate or semi-vee the boat will tend to ride flatter on the surface which means that in a heavy sea state it will pound or if you are unfortunate enough to get into a heavy following sea or quartering waves when transiting actually cause more pitch and yaw which can be very uncomfortable. On the other hand, a steeper Vee adds in the roll component and now your dealing with roll, pitch and yaw and that's also dangerous. It's a guessing game in a lot of ways in particular if you are modifying a plan that has some merit to it as it stands. OK. lets consider a boat that has swamped but has a deck with floatation below the deck. I think that in many (most?) cases she may continue to swamp. How will she float if the water cannot get out? How do we arrange subsequent floatation to minimize probability of capsize? A cubic foot of floatation on the gunnels will give 57 lbs of upward force if we try to immerse it in the water. Say we have 10 cubic feet for a total of 570 lbs of upward force on each gunnel. That is a lot of force and we may need a lot less. This seems to indicate that we should have floatation not only under the deck but under the gunnels. Would we be better with most floatation under the gunnels and no deck so we actually stand on the bottom of the boat as in my current Tolman (she has floatation in the bow and stern floatation tanks too). This would lower the COG further minimizing the risk of capsize and getting enough floatation on the gunnels so she cannot turn over even when swamped. Thoughts? Interesting problem. And I'm not a naval architect nor do I play one on TV. However, it seems to me that the problem isn't so much the flotation as it is positioning the Vcog such that you reduce the mechanical leverage that causes the rollover. Floatation only allows for keeping the boat on the surface - not necessarily from rolling or broaching if that term is applicable to power boats - but it gets the point across. Any boat, including mine which bobs like a cork and is designed to be a level floater, can capsize if presented with enough leverage and/or angular momentum. (Just so you understand, my boat is filled, stem-to-stern, top-to-bottom with closed cell foam - there isn't a lot of space left in my hull for anything except for a very small space in the stern where all the pumps are.) So your supposition of lowering Vcog is probably the best choice as that is how you reduce lateral mechanical leverage given any particular hull design. But again, it also depends on what type of hull you have - at certain angles of Vee, you get inherent lateral instability because of the design of the hull. For example, given the same length my Ranger with it's 8 degree dead rise, wide beam (92") is stable enough to me at 6'3", 255 to stand on the gunwale and there is practically no movement in terms of roll even if I jump up and down. Do the same thing on say a 20' Sea Pro with a 22 degree deadrise, and you will notice that I'm standing there. Conversely, and I've done this as an experiment, if I climb the T-top on my Ranger adding weight higher up, the Ranger does become a little dicey and I have no doubt that I could roll it sufficient to swamp it if I really wanted to - which I don't. :) Don't know if that helps any. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Any boat can be capsized by a steep breaking sea with a height slightly more than half the beam, *any* boat, swamped or unswamped. Other factors play into it of course like center of gravity, center of buoyancy, metacentric height, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height Quoting from above: "If a ship floods (swamps), the loss of stability is due to the free surface effect, as the water accumulating in the hull will be in the bilges, lowering the centre of gravity and actually increasing the metacentric height. This additional mass will however reduce freeboard (distance from water to the deck) and the ship's angle of down flooding (minimum angle of heel at which water will be able to flow into the hull). The range of positive stability will be reduced to the angle of down flooding resulting in a reduced righting lever. When the vessel is inclined, the fluid in the bilge will move to the lower side, shifting its center of gravity toward the list, further extending the heeling force." The only certain way to avoid capsize is to avoid steep breaking waves, and to keep water out of the boat, i.e., maintain a low center of gravity. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:47:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Any boat can be capsized by a steep breaking sea with a height slightly more than half the beam, *any* boat, swamped or unswamped. Other factors play into it of course like center of gravity, center of buoyancy, metacentric height, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height Quoting from above: "If a ship floods (swamps), the loss of stability is due to the free surface effect, as the water accumulating in the hull will be in the bilges, lowering the centre of gravity and actually increasing the metacentric height. This additional mass will however reduce freeboard (distance from water to the deck) and the ship's angle of down flooding (minimum angle of heel at which water will be able to flow into the hull). The range of positive stability will be reduced to the angle of down flooding resulting in a reduced righting lever. When the vessel is inclined, the fluid in the bilge will move to the lower side, shifting its center of gravity toward the list, further extending the heeling force." The only certain way to avoid capsize is to avoid steep breaking waves, and to keep water out of the boat, i.e., maintain a low center of gravity. Way to kill a discussion with facts Wayne. :) Nice job. :) |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:04:45 -0400, Yogi of Woodstock
wrote: Way to kill a discussion with facts Wayne. :) Nice job. :) Awww shucks, tweren't nuthin really... :-) |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 10:04*pm, Yogi of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:47:34 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Other than decreasing topheaviness and increasing beam, how do you go about minimizing probability of capsize for a powerboat? *Consider a swamped boat, what factors cause it to want to float upside down? Any boat can be capsized by a steep breaking sea with a height slightly more than half the beam, *any* boat, swamped or unswamped. Other factors play into it of course like center of gravity, center of buoyancy, metacentric *height, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height Quoting from above: "If a ship floods (swamps), the loss of stability is due to the free surface effect, as the water accumulating in the hull will be in the bilges, lowering the centre of gravity and actually increasing the metacentric height. This additional mass will however reduce freeboard (distance from water to the deck) and the ship's angle of down flooding (minimum angle of heel at which water will be able to flow into the hull). The range of positive stability will be reduced to the angle of down flooding resulting in a reduced righting lever. When the vessel is inclined, the fluid in the bilge will move to the lower side, shifting its center of gravity toward the list, further extending the heeling force." The only certain way to avoid capsize is to avoid steep breaking waves, and to keep water out of the boat, i.e., maintain a low center of gravity. Way to kill a discussion with facts Wayne. :) Nice job. *:)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What you need is a big hunk cut out of your transom, that way the following seas can get into the boat easily. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Preventing Dismasting | General | |||
stain line preventing | General | |||
Preventing pump impeller freeze up? | Cruising | |||
Preventing Rot ?? | General | |||
Preventing Rot ?? | Boat Building |