Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), when she allowed her daughter Bristol to be raped and impregnated by the daughter's boy friend, and then let him move into their house? Wanna bet Palin's 14-year-old daughter will also be knocked up before the next presidential election? After all, the Palins don't believe in birth control. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 8:16*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), when she allowed her daughter Bristol to be raped and impregnated by the daughter's boy friend, and then let him move into their house? Wanna bet Palin's 14-year-old daughter will also be knocked up before the next presidential election? After all, the Palins don't believe in birth control. Herr Krause. Why must you pang over girls you can't have? Tendencies of pedophilia? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 9:16*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 10:49*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. And another day of old weird harold lies. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. Can't do that. It would be racist. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 5:14*am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. *Was completely out of line, slanderous. *What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. *The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin is always parading her children around at political events. During the campaign, she had her knocked-up daughter with her and trotted her out on every occasion, and even had the boyfriend who raped her living at her house...and if memory serves, he was part of the campaign entourage, too. My bet stands...that Ferntree Palin or whatever the 14 year old daughter's name is...will be pregnant before the 2012 elections. The Palins...sounds like a TV family sitcom for deviant adults. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For you, Herr Krause | General | |||
Putting the Voodoo on herr e. kkkrause | General | |||
Berteis's true occupation revealed ! | ASA | |||
a small but important victory for the U.S.-led occupation | ASA | |||
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns | General |