Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good idea!! But I'm afraid the frames will cost more than the stock
shares are worth. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Looks like later today "we" will own 60% of General Motors. What a country, huh? Only cost us about $56 billion for a company that has been insolvent since 1980. Eisboch Could have bought them for $150M this morning at 27 cents a share. Or could have picked them up for a few billion in chapter 11....or cheaper in chapter 7. But big noisy statism...line the buddies pockets. Makes me wonder though. Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:
Makes me wonder though. Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. My father-in-law had some kind of GM bonds. When his wife died, that somehow provided a loophole, so he could back out of the purchase without loss. GM products have been **** for 30 years or more. It had to catch up with them. Daughter got a Lumina for seven grand with less than ten thou on the clock. Fast depreciation.We call it the ****box. Casady |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message m... Looks like later today "we" will own 60% of General Motors. What a country, huh? Only cost us about $56 billion for a company that has been insolvent since 1980. Eisboch Could have bought them for $150M this morning at 27 cents a share. Or could have picked them up for a few billion in chapter 11....or cheaper in chapter 7. But big noisy statism...line the buddies pockets. Makes me wonder though. Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. You guys really want to get depressed by Government Motors? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/bu...er=rss&emc=rss Unbelievable. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Looks like later today "we" will own 60% of General Motors. What a country, huh? Only cost us about $56 billion for a company that has been insolvent since 1980. Eisboch Could have bought them for $150M this morning at 27 cents a share. Or could have picked them up for a few billion in chapter 11....or cheaper in chapter 7. But big noisy statism...line the buddies pockets. Makes me wonder though. Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. You guys really want to get depressed by Government Motors? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/bu...er=rss&emc=rss Unbelievable. I like the part about keeping GM alive to protect existing government revenues/institutions. Can't have all of those people sitting at home wait for a job to come along sucking at the teat of the government. The kid is 31 with no job experience and he's already a bureaucrat. Any one Larry Summers recommends needs to be thrown out the door on his ass. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 8:28*am, BAR wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message om... Looks like later today "we" *will own 60% of General Motors. What a country, huh? Only cost us about $56 billion for a company that has been insolvent since 1980. Eisboch Could have bought them for $150M this morning at 27 cents a share. Or could have picked them up for a few billion in chapter 11....or cheaper in chapter 7. But big noisy statism...line the buddies pockets. Makes me wonder though. *Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? *After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. *Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? *LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. You guys really want to get depressed by Government Motors? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/bu...?_r=2&partner=... Unbelievable. I like the part about keeping GM alive to protect existing government revenues/institutions. Can't have all of those people sitting at home wait for a job to come along sucking at the teat of the government. Make no mistake... the GM deal is welfare and food stamps for the autoworkers, just sent through a different funnel. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:17:28 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:37 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message om... Looks like later today "we" will own 60% of General Motors. What a country, huh? Only cost us about $56 billion for a company that has been insolvent since 1980. Eisboch Could have bought them for $150M this morning at 27 cents a share. Or could have picked them up for a few billion in chapter 11....or cheaper in chapter 7. But big noisy statism...line the buddies pockets. Makes me wonder though. Why did it pop up to 80 cents or so? After a 100:1 or more dilution in this plan, it isn't worth 27 cents. Do people holding GM shares not now know they are valued at about the same as a roll of toilet paper? LOL, buy 100 shares so you can wipe your arse. You guys really want to get depressed by Government Motors? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/bu...er=rss&emc=rss Unbelievable. Why? Who can do worse than Waggoner? Ken Lay maybe, but he's dead. Bernie Madoff maybe, but he's in jail. The good ole boys ain't doing too good lately. --Vic |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Very Adventuresome Fellow | General | |||
Thank you, my fellow Americans! | General | |||
Fellow Texans | ASA | |||
EE ZZ out rod holder | General | |||
FS: Rod Holder in NY | Marketplace |