jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 06:38:57 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


How you can make comparisons is humorous.
Exactly.

Get over yourself.


What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left. Perhaps far
left from your POV.

Refreshing to see that you can be humorous too.

I'm impressed you got that with your eyes shut and ears plugged.


That was going to be the title of Sarah Palin's new book, until someome
told her there was a "naughty" movie of the same name" "Eyes Wide Shut."

On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:34:51 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

Hadn't heard that. I saw something about a baseball player getting
@$200 million, and the taxpayers footing the bill for the stadium.
New York, I think.
Lot's of stuff is really out of whack.
I mean we're not talking about Clark Gable, Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig
here.
Very odd.

--Vic

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.
Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.

Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.

Why do you liberals make such a big deal out of infidelity.

BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.
Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.

Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.

Why do you liberals make such a big deal out of infidelity.


*Morality* used to be an issue of GOP before the public discovered it
had none.

On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:49:08 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.
Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.

Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.

Why do you liberals make such a big deal out of infidelity.

Because "Conservatives" hold themselves out as moral.

When you sell yourself as above reproach and rail against gay marriage
or rights, it's especially damning when you get caught with a wide
stance, soliciting underage male pages or having long-term
relationships with hookers.

Newt told his wife he was leaving her while she was battling cancer in
the hospital. How possibly low can one go and still maintain they
represent the morally correct? Evidently, damned low.

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming
from the far
left instead of the far right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous.
Exactly.

Get over yourself.

Eisboch

What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left.

I would have to agree Harry is not far left, since Communism, with the
Government owning all businesses and having complete control of every
aspect of our economy would be the far left. I don't think Harry wants
the government to own all businesses.

I do find anyone who spends all of their time using expletives to
describe anyone who disagrees with them to be extremely boring. It
makes one look like an intellectual midget, lacking in basic vocabulary
skills.

Expletives are ONLY effective is they are used extremely sparingly. If
they are used in every post, they are only effective in showing a weak
minded individual. Too many times, post in here sound like middle
school kids who have just learned some "Bad Words" and want to use them
in every sentence.


Well said. I agree with this post.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:49:08 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.
Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.
Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.
Why do you liberals make such a big deal out of infidelity.

Because "Conservatives" hold themselves out as moral.

Isn't it a goal? Something for the imperfect to achieve?

When you sell yourself as above reproach and rail against gay marriage
or rights, it's especially damning when you get caught with a wide
stance, soliciting underage male pages or having long-term
relationships with hookers.

Marriage is a religious institution, why is the state involved in a
religious activity. The state should be granting a legal status of a
civil union requiring a legal action to break apart. Once church should
be involved in the dissolution of a marriage.

Newt told his wife he was leaving her while she was battling cancer in
the hospital. How possibly low can one go and still maintain they
represent the morally correct? Evidently, damned low.

Why do you hold others to standards you don't hold yourself to?

BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:49:08 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.
Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.
Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.
Why do you liberals make such a big deal out of infidelity.

Because "Conservatives" hold themselves out as moral.

Isn't it a goal? Something for the imperfect to achieve?




Conservative "morality" is a canard, nothing more. Conservatism is
immoral, per se.

On Sat, 23 May 2009 08:34:48 -0400, HK wrote:

Some of them even have to whack their thumbs with a hammer in order to
understand that whacking your thumb with a hammer hurts."

I have a 28 oz checkered head ripping hammer. I cringe just thinking
about hitting a thumb with it. It already has a notch on it. A drunk
hit himself in the forehead with the claw on the back swing.

Casady

On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:16:58 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

And Rush is paid a lot better.

Rush can be very funny. He had a parody ad for the 25 horse document
shredder. The one with " Subpoena Speed " Able to do a six drawer
cabinet in less time than it takes the Feds to get past your
secretary.

Casady