Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.


As if it would do any good, Herr Krause needs to be reminded of this.

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:



How you can make comparisons is humorous.


Exactly.

Get over yourself.




What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left. Perhaps far
left from your POV.


Refreshing to see that you can be humorous too.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:



How you can make comparisons is humorous.


Exactly.

Get over yourself.




What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left. Perhaps far
left from your POV.


Refreshing to see that you can be humorous too.

Eisboch

I'll bet that JPS would say Krause is a centrist and left wingers don't
exist.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the
far
left instead of the far right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous.
Exactly.

Get over yourself.

Eisboch

What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left.

I would have to agree Harry is not far left, since Communism, with the
Government owning all businesses and having complete control of every
aspect of our economy would be the far left. I don't think Harry wants
the government to own all businesses.

I do find anyone who spends all of their time using expletives to
describe anyone who disagrees with them to be extremely boring. It
makes one look like an intellectual midget, lacking in basic vocabulary
skills.

Expletives are ONLY effective is they are used extremely sparingly. If
they are used in every post, they are only effective in showing a weak
minded individual. Too many times, post in here sound like middle
school kids who have just learned some "Bad Words" and want to use them
in every sentence.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:34:51 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

I'd agree with everything after the 'nor'!
--

John H

jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

I thought you were a businessman.

Rule #1 get the money upfront.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

Right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous. The nut case wingers who
listen to Rush are weak minded followers who are desperate to maintain
their sense of god-given, moral superiority over those they want to
suspect are conspiring against them.

Simple minded followers who need to see issues as binary choices.

Uh-huh.

jps wrote:

Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.

Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.

On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:

Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.

Pelosi, Reid and Shumer come to mind.

Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, The Dick Cheney make Dems
look like pikers when it comes to lying and cheating.

On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:29:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

I thought you were a businessman.

Rule #1 get the money upfront.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

Right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous. The nut case wingers who
listen to Rush are weak minded followers who are desperate to maintain
their sense of god-given, moral superiority over those they want to
suspect are conspiring against them.

Simple minded followers who need to see issues as binary choices.

Uh-huh.

You're not the prototypical example but you come close.

On Mon, 25 May 2009 06:38:57 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .

On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:



How you can make comparisons is humorous.


Exactly.

Get over yourself.




What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left. Perhaps far
left from your POV.


Refreshing to see that you can be humorous too.

I'm impressed you got that with your eyes shut and ears plugged.