On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:16:58 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

And Rush is paid a lot better.

Rush can be very funny. He had a parody ad for the 25 horse document
shredder. The one with " Subpoena Speed " Able to do a six drawer
cabinet in less time than it takes the Feds to get past your
secretary.

Casady

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

How you can make comparisons is humorous. The nut case wingers who
listen to Rush are weak minded followers who are desperate to maintain
their sense of god-given, moral superiority over those they want to
suspect are conspiring against them.

Simple minded followers who need to see issues as binary choices.

"jps" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the
far
left instead of the far right.



How you can make comparisons is humorous.

Exactly.

Get over yourself.

Eisboch

On Mon, 25 May 2009 03:14:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the
far
left instead of the far right.



How you can make comparisons is humorous.

Exactly.

Get over yourself.

Eisboch

What do I have to do with it? Harry is not far left. Perhaps far
left from your POV.

The far left would have nothing to do with guns or writing materials
for half of Harry's clients. The far left wouldn't likely be involved
in capitalism, opting instead for communes, saving the salmon and
trees. I don't get that from Harry's writings.

Rush is another story. He's not just far right, he's willing to lie,
cheat and steal his way to the spotlight, ratings and power.

Harry doesn't have followers or devotees. He certainly has some
thoughts to which at least a handful of us subscribe. Protecting
American workers is one. Giving our military real support instead of
lip service. Sending our countrymen into harms way for a good reason.

I guess those are far left rantings to you.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.


As if it would do any good, Herr Krause needs to be reminded of this.

On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:34:51 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

I'd agree with everything after the 'nor'!
--

John H

jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

I thought you were a businessman.

Rule #1 get the money upfront.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

Right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous. The nut case wingers who
listen to Rush are weak minded followers who are desperate to maintain
their sense of god-given, moral superiority over those they want to
suspect are conspiring against them.

Simple minded followers who need to see issues as binary choices.

Uh-huh.

On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:29:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

I thought you were a businessman.

Rule #1 get the money upfront.

Rush is a slimeball. Titular head of the RNC.

Harry is neither a slimeball nor the titular head of the DNC.

Right.

How you can make comparisons is humorous. The nut case wingers who
listen to Rush are weak minded followers who are desperate to maintain
their sense of god-given, moral superiority over those they want to
suspect are conspiring against them.

Simple minded followers who need to see issues as binary choices.

Uh-huh.

You're not the prototypical example but you come close.

On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:34:51 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.

That's pretty rich. Limbaugh made a deal with his broadcaster for
100MM payment up front and how they're having to let personnel go
because they're damned near bankrupt.

Hadn't heard that. I saw something about a baseball player getting
@$200 million, and the taxpayers footing the bill for the stadium.
New York, I think.
Lot's of stuff is really out of whack.
I mean we're not talking about Clark Gable, Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig
here.
Very odd.

--Vic

On May 23, 6:42*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jim7856" wrote in message

...

HK wrote:
Rightwing Radio Hosts Across the Nation Make Discovery

Swiped from KOS

No wonder your head is messed up. Stop reading that swill, for God's sake.

He's really no different than a Rush Limbaugh, only he's coming from the far
left instead of the far right.
His daily rantings are exactly the same one can hear on any of the left
sided media outlets. *Almost word for word, in fact.

Only difference is that Rush is a lot smarter than Harry. *Rush makes his
rantings sound original.

Eisboch

The difference is however, you don't find hardly a single poster here
on rec.boats lathing forth cut and pastes from Limbagh, or Canadians
making posts from Michael Coren because they don't feel it necessary
to do so.

Herr Krause has made it well known that people, or should I say "Reich-
winged christian fundies" should keep there religion to themselves and
he should be granted protection from such thereof.

Yet, he freely posts such tainted prose as it is his gospel.

Do as I say and not as I do, Herr Krause?