Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:51:39 -0400, HK wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

He's obviously not considering any of the Rs. There are some doozies
that make Waters look like Einstein.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:51:39 -0400, HK wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.

Have another **** taco, Tom...

He's obviously not considering any of the Rs. There are some doozies
that make Waters look like Einstein.


Michelle Bachman may be the biggest ditz, but there are some incredibly
stupid Republican congresscritters that do us - all americans - real harm.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

You can always tell when Krause is distressed and close to having an
emotional episode. I get a kick out if it.

On May 22, 12:51*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. *He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.

Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

Yep, that's his M.O. Ask him about one of his many lies and see what
happens!

On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:51:23 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

You think calling someone "dumber than Maxine Waters" is a fact?

You can't tell the difference between pure bull**** opinion and facts?

Is that a "Conservative" skill?

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:51:23 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4eednZBRDMCWV4vXnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

You think calling someone "dumber than Maxine Waters" is a fact?

You can't tell the difference between pure bull**** opinion and facts?

Is that a "Conservative" skill?

Hairy's response was "Have another **** taco, Tom...". If you think that's a
proper response to a simple statement, you're as out of touch with reality
as he. Why would you assume I'm conservative just because I take issue with
a ranting egomaniac who seldom offers any original ideas of his own that are
constructive?

Why would you think Hairy needs defending? Obviously you are like him -
can't rebut ideas (or opinions)so attack the messenger.

On Fri, 22 May 2009 15:57:33 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:51:23 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4eednZBRDMCWV4vXnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@earthlink .com...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

You think calling someone "dumber than Maxine Waters" is a fact?

You can't tell the difference between pure bull**** opinion and facts?

Is that a "Conservative" skill?

Hairy's response was "Have another **** taco, Tom...". If you think that's a
proper response to a simple statement, you're as out of touch with reality
as he. Why would you assume I'm conservative just because I take issue with
a ranting egomaniac who seldom offers any original ideas of his own that are
constructive?

Why would you think Hairy needs defending? Obviously you are like him -
can't rebut ideas (or opinions)so attack the messenger.

More and more people are seeing the light!
--

John H

On Fri, 22 May 2009 15:57:33 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:51:23 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4eednZBRDMCWV4vXnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@earthlink .com...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Amazing - simply amazing. He's dumber than Maxine Waters and that is
saying a lot.


Have another **** taco, Tom...

Hairy did it again. Can't rebut facts, so attack the messenger.

You think calling someone "dumber than Maxine Waters" is a fact?

You can't tell the difference between pure bull**** opinion and facts?

Is that a "Conservative" skill?

Hairy's response was "Have another **** taco, Tom...". If you think that's a
proper response to a simple statement, you're as out of touch with reality
as he. Why would you assume I'm conservative just because I take issue with
a ranting egomaniac who seldom offers any original ideas of his own that are
constructive?

Why would you think Hairy needs defending? Obviously you are like him -
can't rebut ideas (or opinions)so attack the messenger.

You said "facts" which didn't have a bloody shred of context. It's
customary patter heard from "Conservatives" cross country 'cause some
dweeb on talk radio said that liberals can't deal with "facts." Stop
using stupid cliches that don't fit.

Harry certainly doesn't require defense but you do require a spanking.