On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. Cut from the same cloth as harold.

wrote:
On May 6, 2:07 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42 pm, jps wrote:
It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.
Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".
I disagree.
That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped
You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.


Refute? You mean dispute. Another self-congratulatory rightwing piece of
crap.

On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:17:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. Cut from the same cloth as harold.

And what prey tell have I lied about?

You silly skank.

On May 6, 3:28*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:17:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. *I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. *I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. *That's all I wanted to do. *Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. *I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. *That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. *Cut from the same cloth as harold.

And what prey tell have I lied about?

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

As your spittle filled rants have shown, there is no way your agenda
is just the few basic statements you offered. There's far more to
your disturbed psyche than that. It's just a show; a lie. You're
attempting to hide your true colors.

Either that, or you're one the most bipolar people that haunts this NG.

On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.

On May 6, 4:50*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.

Uh, we pretty much unraveled your little screwdriver fantasy... You
twisted it worse than Donnie saying he saw pictures of Harrys Lobsta'
boat, or Harry saying his landlord was a Dr, Dr.... snerk You guys
can't even man up when you tell a lie...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.


Unfortunately, the only spanking he'll be getting is from the Palm sisters!

On Wed, 6 May 2009 18:54:11 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.


Unfortunately, the only spanking he'll be getting is from the Palm sisters!

They should grab him by the balls and give a good yank.