Yup, the rich suck.
They donate way more to the democratic party and the CEOs of big
companies are hugely disproportionatly democrat.
People assume the leaders of these troubled companies screwing the
taxpayers by getting bailouts are repubs.But no, same as the people
who started this crap with frannie may and freddie mac( see frank,
barney) this is liberals screwing us all over.
Ok.
I didnt read the thread you posted.
Why bother, i know my role.

In fact, of the "Fortune 100 companies", they donate at a rate of about 14.5
to 1 to Democrats over Republicans. (Oh, look, there goes another
trillion......)

On Apr 27, 2:11*am, "Long Ranger" wrote:

In fact, of the "Fortune 100 companies", they donate at a rate of about 14.5
to 1 to Democrats over Republicans. (Oh, look, there goes another
trillion......)

"In fact, the grant-making was lopsided: The political left received
nearly $59 million, while the political right received only about $4
million, a ratio of 14.5 to 1.

The Wildlife Conservation Society, which took in a huge $35-million
grant from the Goldman Sachs Foundation, was the top beneficiary on
the political left of Fortune 100 foundation giving. It was followed
by the Conservation International Foundation ($4.5 million), the
National Council of La Raza ($2.9 million) and the Nature Conservancy
($1.9 million).

The American Enterprise Institute received $575,000, which was the
largest single Fortune 100 grant to a group on the right, followed by
the Competitive Enterprise Institute ($325,000) and the Employment
Policies Institute ($275,000)."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16588

good call there;
wildlife conservation society = democrats.
conservation international foundation =democrats
national council of la raza = democrats
nature conservancy = democrats.

you don't see those nature groups as being fundamentally different
from the AEI, or the CEI, other than in democrats vs republicans?