"HK" wrote in message
m...


Seriously? Because there are perfectly legitimate subsistence fishermen
using those ports, and merchant vessels, too. A harbor blockade could be
very effective.


Harbor blockades would probably bring on another Clinton fiasco of 1993. He
tried to push his luck following Bush I's humanitarian assistance and the
results were disastrous.

Somehow a means must be worked out to make the purpose of piracy (ransom
money) meaningless.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Seriously? Because there are perfectly legitimate subsistence
fishermen using those ports, and merchant vessels, too. A harbor
blockade could be very effective.


Harbor blockades would probably bring on another Clinton fiasco of
1993. He tried to push his luck following Bush I's humanitarian
assistance and the results were disastrous.

Somehow a means must be worked out to make the purpose of piracy (ransom
money) meaningless.

Eisboch




Well...they could be paid off in dollars! :)





--

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:54:15 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...


Seriously? Because there are perfectly legitimate subsistence fishermen
using those ports, and merchant vessels, too. A harbor blockade could be
very effective.


Harbor blockades would probably bring on another Clinton fiasco of 1993. He
tried to push his luck following Bush I's humanitarian assistance and the
results were disastrous.

Somehow a means must be worked out to make the purpose of piracy (ransom
money) meaningless.

Violence is the only way. Piracy will continue until it becomes too
dangerous.

Casady

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...


Violence is the only way. Piracy will continue until it becomes too
dangerous.

Casady


Or it just doesn't pay anymore.

Eisboch