| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 13, 9:43*am, HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:46:13 -0500, D K wrote: The one thing I know for sure is the F90 is best suited for a three-blade prop rather than a four. Three is always more efficient than four. Four blades is a way to get the blade area in a smaller diameter, if you lack space. Casady My admittedly limited experience with Yamaha taught me that the company is pretty damned good matching up engines, props and boats, and that a good dealer is also a valuable resource in prop selection. When I took delivery of my 2008 model boat, the boat factory had just changed the prop it spec'd for the boat and engine combo, upon a suggestion from Yamaha. The factory sent me copies of performance print-outs for several props. I was able to almost exactly duplicate the performance on the factory print-out. Almost every outboard boat I considered has performance sheets available * from the engine manufacturer, and those sheets specify props. Really? How did they know your exact requirements as far as weight, loading fore and aft, etc.? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A boating post!!! | General | |||
| boating post | General | |||
| Boating post | General | |||
| A boating post. | General | |||
| Prop wrench size | General | |||