I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:07:26 -0800 (PST), wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

The problem here is that it was a Dem congress that pushed this payoff
through.
That's a good reason to slow this stimulus package down.
These congress critters sometime act like army ants, unthinkingly
marching to a goal they don't give any thought to, but just smell.
There are pieces they can enact quickly, and others soon enough
after more thought and discussion.

--Vic

On Feb 6, 9:07*am, wrote:
I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

You were not paying attention. We did **** all over Bush's bailout.
It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail.
Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it
at the time. It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it.

Frog watch wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/
Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

You were not paying attention. We did **** all over Bush's bailout.
It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail.
Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it
at the time. It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it.


Oh, well, if it was Malkin...no one who mattered was listening.

On Feb 6, 12:07*pm, HK wrote:
Frog watch wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/
Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

You were not paying attention. *We did **** all over Bush's bailout.
It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail.
Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it
at the time. *It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it.

Oh, well, if it was Malkin...no one who mattered was listening.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No one who mattered to you, but that's only Salty, Donnie, and
Slammer.. Two of your followers don't even live in the country so they
really have no dog in the hunt.

You don't have a mandate as you seem to think, read on, get informed:

snip
Obama pleads for nonpartisanship out of one side of his mouth, but
then ignores the arguments of Republicans not just out of the other
side of his mouth, but with a grin like the smirk of the cat that ate
the canary, as he reminds the American people that his team won. His
unholy alliance actually did win, by capturing a mere 3% above 50% of
the vote against the party of a president with an approval rating of
closer to 30% (even less, by some polls), rendering that 53% figure
(rather than 70% or more) a sign of relative dissatisfaction with the
winner, in this context. Obama won not necessarily because the
American people wanted change in general or Obama’s type of change in
particular, but because, inter alia, he outspent his opponent by a 4-
to-1 margin in many key states, and had the majority of the major
media outlets campaigning for him and blaming the economic collapse on
the Republicans instead of in a bipartisan way, at least also on the
Democrats who had set the disastrous chain in motion years ago by
coercing the banks to loan money to people who couldn’t even afford a
down payment, much less have the ability to pay their mortgages in the
event of inevitable downturns of the economy.
/snip

Insult this, commie boy...

On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:34:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

These congress critters sometime act like army ants, unthinkingly
marching to a goal

Army ants don't have a goal. They leave the nest in a thirty degree
fan and go out about two hundred yards, eating every insect on the
ground. Catterpillers don't run fast. Army ants are subject to a lot
of popular myth. In reality they are cool enough, like all ants.

Casady

On Feb 6, 9:44*am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07*am, wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

Keyword "projects". At least with this bill we are going to get
infrastructure, etc. out of it, as opposed to, say, just handing big
banks a check, and usually a check that was more than they were
supposed to get! It amazes me how you all can try to spin ANYTHING so
that Republican = good, Democat = bad. Just remember, when this
stimulus works, there was NO House Republican that voted for it. Just
remember that. Thankfully, some in the Senate are taking their
blinders off and realizing something has to be done. The more the
right delays, the worse it's getting.

On Feb 6, 2:09 pm, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote:

On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the
banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still
up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet
projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or
stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed
miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the
country into a deep hole...

Keyword "projects". At least with this bill we are going to get
infrastructure, etc. out of it, as opposed to, say, just handing big
banks a check, and usually a check that was more than they were
supposed to get! It amazes me how you all can try to spin ANYTHING so
that Republican = good, Democat = bad. Just remember, when this
stimulus works, there was NO House Republican that voted for it. Just
remember that. Thankfully, some in the Senate are taking their
blinders off and realizing something has to be done. The more the
right delays, the worse it's getting.

The bailout is bad whether Repub or Dem.

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:07:26 -0800 (PST), wrote:

I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/

Bush is old news. Besides, the Democrat congress is to blame for that.