| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's
plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Feb 6, 9:07*am, wrote:
I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote: I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... You were not paying attention. We did **** all over Bush's bailout. It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail. Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it at the time. It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it. |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
Frog watch wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote: On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote: I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... You were not paying attention. We did **** all over Bush's bailout. It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail. Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it at the time. It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it. Oh, well, if it was Malkin...no one who mattered was listening. |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Feb 6, 12:07*pm, HK wrote:
Frog watch wrote: On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote: On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote: I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... You were not paying attention. *We did **** all over Bush's bailout. It was a bad idea then and I advocated allowing the lenders to fail. Right wing extremists Michelle Malkin did nothing but scream about it at the time. *It was a very bad idea and we should learn from it. Oh, well, if it was Malkin...no one who mattered was listening.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one who mattered to you, but that's only Salty, Donnie, and Slammer.. Two of your followers don't even live in the country so they really have no dog in the hunt. You don't have a mandate as you seem to think, read on, get informed: snip Obama pleads for nonpartisanship out of one side of his mouth, but then ignores the arguments of Republicans not just out of the other side of his mouth, but with a grin like the smirk of the cat that ate the canary, as he reminds the American people that his team won. His unholy alliance actually did win, by capturing a mere 3% above 50% of the vote against the party of a president with an approval rating of closer to 30% (even less, by some polls), rendering that 53% figure (rather than 70% or more) a sign of relative dissatisfaction with the winner, in this context. Obama won not necessarily because the American people wanted change in general or Obama’s type of change in particular, but because, inter alia, he outspent his opponent by a 4- to-1 margin in many key states, and had the majority of the major media outlets campaigning for him and blaming the economic collapse on the Republicans instead of in a bipartisan way, at least also on the Democrats who had set the disastrous chain in motion years ago by coercing the banks to loan money to people who couldn’t even afford a down payment, much less have the ability to pay their mortgages in the event of inevitable downturns of the economy. /snip Insult this, commie boy... |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:34:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: These congress critters sometime act like army ants, unthinkingly marching to a goal Army ants don't have a goal. They leave the nest in a thirty degree fan and go out about two hundred yards, eating every insect on the ground. Catterpillers don't run fast. Army ants are subject to a lot of popular myth. In reality they are cool enough, like all ants. Casady |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Feb 6, 9:44*am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:07*am, wrote: I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... Keyword "projects". At least with this bill we are going to get infrastructure, etc. out of it, as opposed to, say, just handing big banks a check, and usually a check that was more than they were supposed to get! It amazes me how you all can try to spin ANYTHING so that Republican = good, Democat = bad. Just remember, when this stimulus works, there was NO House Republican that voted for it. Just remember that. Thankfully, some in the Senate are taking their blinders off and realizing something has to be done. The more the right delays, the worse it's getting. |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
On Feb 6, 2:09 pm, wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:44 am, wrote: On Feb 6, 9:07 am, wrote: I've noticed that every conservative here has been ****ting on Obama's plans, but none have said much about Bush's Bailout. http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...out.Oversight/ Well, the dems supported it because it bailed out big business and the banking system and although they are not moving much, they are still up and running. This new bill is nothing but a punchlist of pet projects the left has been sitting on for a decade. The "bailout or stimulous" is virutally non-existant. Obama has already failed miserably as a leader, he is letting Nancy Peosi and her ilk run the country into a deep hole... Keyword "projects". At least with this bill we are going to get infrastructure, etc. out of it, as opposed to, say, just handing big banks a check, and usually a check that was more than they were supposed to get! It amazes me how you all can try to spin ANYTHING so that Republican = good, Democat = bad. Just remember, when this stimulus works, there was NO House Republican that voted for it. Just remember that. Thankfully, some in the Senate are taking their blinders off and realizing something has to be done. The more the right delays, the worse it's getting. The bailout is bad whether Repub or Dem. |
Bush admin. overpaid banks in HIS bailout.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com