Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 101
Default Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:


I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.


* If so you grasped none of them.


He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could disprove
a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly


So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to
prove it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 162
Default Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Feb 1, 5:57Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:


I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.


Â* If so you grasped none of them.


He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. Â*When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly


So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.


Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrest Bush
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #3   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Default Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:


I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.


* If so you grasped none of them.


He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.


Which was not his original claim.


Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.


Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.


--
Regards, Curly


So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?


You're pathetic.


Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly


You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. Too
bad for you.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Default Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:


I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.


* If so you grasped none of them.


He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.


Which was not his original claim.


Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.


Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies..


--
Regards, Curly


So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?


You're pathetic.


Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.


--
Regards, Curly


You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.


You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?


You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Default Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:


I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.


* If so you grasped none of them.


He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.


Which was not his original claim.


Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.


Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.


--
Regards, Curly


So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?


You're pathetic.


Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.


--
Regards, Curly


You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.


You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?


You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.


So, you admit that gummer has failed miserably at what he claimed
would be an easy task.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray [email protected] General 5 February 2nd 09 03:58 AM
Worse than Guantanamo! Mike[_9_] ASA 5 July 9th 08 03:27 AM
FBI files [email protected] General 7 July 22nd 05 05:23 PM
The case for Bush is the case against him Jim General 4 March 7th 04 07:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017