Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could disprove
a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to
prove it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Feb 1, 5:57Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

Â* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. Â*When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrest Bush
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. Too
bad for you.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies..

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.

So, you admit that gummer has failed miserably at what he claimed
would be an easy task.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Feb 2, 11:58*pm, Bob Brock wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:10 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.

So, you admit that gummer has failed miserably at what he claimed
would be an easy task.

I was just stunned that someone would attempt to prove that the
"Flying Spaghetti Monster" were real. What a kook.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:00:34 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 2, 11:58*pm, Bob Brock wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:10 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.

So, you admit that gummer has failed miserably at what he claimed
would be an easy task.

I was just stunned that someone would attempt to prove that the
"Flying Spaghetti Monster" were real. What a kook.

You should be stunned since no one did.

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:34:57 -0500, Bob Brock wrote:

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:00:34 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

[quoted text muted]

You should be stunned since no one did.

False surprise, he makes **** up to distract and protect his hero,
gunner. To return the context:

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrest Bush
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray
 

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:00:34 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 2, 11:58*pm, Bob Brock wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:17:10 -0800 (PST),





wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:51*am, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:23:40 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:07 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Feb 1, 5:57*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:49 -0500, Cliff wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:17:21 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I have posted a number of articles on proving the negative.

* If so you grasped none of them.

He posted one, many months after making the claim that he could
disprove a negative, from some wacko religionist.

Which was not his original claim.

Gunner claimed that _he_ could prove a negative, not that he could post
an article from some other wacko. *When challenged to prove the Flying
Spaghetti Monster didn't exist he killfiled his way out of further
discussion.

Cut and run, evasion from another of his outlandish claims and lies.

--
Regards, Curly

So, you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster and need Gunner to prove
it doesn't exist?

You're pathetic.

Your distortions are pathetic, read the context SpokesRoach.

--
Regards, Curly

You're the one floating the idea of a flying spaghetti monster. *Too
bad for you.

You would think that it's nonexistence would be really easy for gummer
to prove wouldn't you?

You would think that Squirrelly was brilliant to bring up his own
version of the closet monster.

So, you admit that gummer has failed miserably at what he claimed
would be an easy task.

I was just stunned that someone would attempt to prove that the
"Flying Spaghetti Monster" were real. What a kook.

You took the wrong boat years ago, right?
--
Cliff