On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:14:05 -0500, Jim wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?


Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or
13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.

It's consensual, by the way.

I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.

And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.


You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.

I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.

She must have been a real skank.

I apologise - that last picture was the wrong one.

This is the 16 year old who raped our buddy...

http://www.swsports.org/images/Pictures/untitled.bmp

If I told you where I got the picture, I'd have to kill you. :)