"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
news:JcqdnT2dit0XzPTUnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Jan 10, 6:15 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
More drool from Andy Borwitz..

There's more cleverness and wit in Andy's farts than anything you have
done in your entire life, with the possible exception of getting in a
fight with the cops at your local police station.

No there isn't. All he sells is hate. It's the same lame comedy (being
generous here) that ruined Saturday Night Live and Air America... it
sells great to folks like you and readers of the Huffington Hoax..


------------------

Which reminds me. I was watching one of Harry's favorites, Rachael
Maddow the other day.
I get a kick out of her because she's so blatantly biased. She was
interviewing some guest, discussing a subject that had absolutely
nothing
to do with Bush, Obama, the economy or anything of current importance
yet
somehow she found a way to cast blame on Bush in response to almost
anything the guest said. It was comical and I wish I had a tape
recorder
or DVR on to preserve it.

I guess it's currently the "in" thing to be an elitist, liberal, Bush
bashing celebrity I guess. It surprises me because she holds a PhD in
something, so she's not stupid. Just brainwashed.

Eisboch


Bush has had a hand in or on just about every major problem this country
is facing. The majority of adults in this country give him very low
marks
and will be pleased to see him out of office. Maddow's doctorate is from
one of the Oxford colleges.

So what? Bush went to Yale. You are so over impressed with academic
credentials that you are blinded to reality.

Eisboch

A C student who got in on his family's coattails.

They guy doesn't have critical thinking skills. He's just ****ed up
the 5th job he's had in his adult life.

He's batting 1.000


Which has nothing to do with Harry's fascination and worship of people with
Ivy league degrees.
It's a common issue in his assessment of the "smartness", job qualifications
and value of others.

During a presidential news conference, I particularly liked Ronald Reagan's
response to a reporter who was trying to make a name for himself by asking
about Reagan's school (Eureka College) in a wise ass and critical way.

Reagan paused for a minute then replied (paraphrasing), "gee, I was just
thinking of what I could have become if I had gone to a big name school".

IMO, Reagan was a lot smarter and accomplished than the modern left give him
credit for.
I am not necessarily speaking of his policies. I am referring to his
leadership qualities. He was secure in his mind of what he wanted to
achieve, he handled himself well in a crisis and oozed with optimism for the
future which was infectious to the rest of the population. That's true
leadership. I am not alone in this assessment or opinion. More and more
people that worked closely with him are coming forward, discounting many of
the rumors and myths of him being a "dullard" or asleep at the wheel.

Eisboch