On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:32:36 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 8:02*am, Keith nuttle wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:



On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:40:54 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2...o-be-named-cia...

Intersting pick. *Another Clintonista.

The Obama Administration looks like 1992 all over again. *All he needs
now is a Monica Lewinsky. *Oh wait, he does - she's in the Carribean
incommunicado.

Seriously, what the hell is Obama thinking? *Another outsider to run
the CIA?

Jane Harman would have been a great pick, but NNNNOOOOOO...

We gotta have another Clintonista.

--

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that
a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes
that it will also make better soup."

H.L. Mencken

Per the paper this morning Mrs obama has been placed in charge of the
interns.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I still find it incredible that the people who are acting like Obama
has failed before he's ever been in office, are the one's who still
think that Bush did a good job after he's run our country into the
ground for eight years!

No one has said a word about Obama's failing.

Even Feinstein was surprised at the pick of Panetta. Do you not find it
somewhat strange that Obama picks someone with no intelligence experience
and doesn't even consult with the Senate expert in the area?

One idea may be that 'no news is good news'. That seems to be the way NBC
operates.