|
Is there anyone here...
....who can watch all of this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote:
...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:10:04 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:51:17 -0500, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. I don't think torture is an effective weapon and I'm not about to torture myself for poos and giggles. Your answer: maybe, but not me..... 'ya know? Being forced to watch the whole thing would make waterboarding look very gentle. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 11:58*am, wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 12:16*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 11:58*am, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. Kind of like this, huh? http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...dumbquotes.htm |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote:
...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one? http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 12:24*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 11:58 am, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. * Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. * And you hang out here with such a nice crowd, too. Oh, there's plenty of funny things on usenet. Like a lying vulgar fat pig named Harry. And this: hkrause Dec 30 1999, 3:00 am Newsgroups: rec.boats From: Date: 1999/12/30 Subject: OT: Y2K Shortage "Jon V." wrote: On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 wrote: I've got two crates of Federal .40 that accompanied the handgun I received as a gift. You got a file? Wow! Handguns as gifts... somebody knows you! Was it your wife, or her father? Maybe it was anonymous. hkrause wrote: Neither. It was a friend who has moved on to other hobbies. I haven't disposed of the handgun yet. It's got a trigger lock on it, and it is sitting in a locked case inside my safe. It is safe. My plan is to destroy the handgun. I suppose the local cops could make use of the ammo, once I get off my butt and do something about it. |
Is there anyone here...
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch |
Is there anyone here...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on many major media outlets. Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. She's stupid, too. Or not... which is it? |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 12:48*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." —Trenton, N.J., Sept. 23, 2002 |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 12:54*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 12:48*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". |
Is there anyone here...
wrote:
On Jan 4, 12:54 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. She's stupid, too. Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". It's just astonishing that after all these years and after everything Bush and Company have screwed up, the doof still has fans. There's a lot more to Bush's stupidity than his inability to articulate. |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote:
Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady |
Is there anyone here...
Richard Casady wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote: Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady There you go, insulting decent bimbos everywhere. Palin helped McCain lose, but he did most of that by himself. Bad candidate, terrible campaign. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 1:27*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 12:54 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". *It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. *Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". It's just astonishing that after all these years and after everything Bush and Company have screwed up, the doof still has fans. There's a lot more to Bush's stupidity than his inability to articulate. Nope, sorry... never said I was a fan. That's short for fanatic, those people that swoon and cry at rallies, and feel tingling in their legs, ya know? I think most people hope that Obama can do something *other* than give a stirring speech. We don't know yet, and what we *do* know doesn't really look that good. Meanwhile, Caroline is an empty shell with a storied last name. Ya know? |
Is there anyone here...
wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:27 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On Jan 4, 12:54 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. She's stupid, too. Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". It's just astonishing that after all these years and after everything Bush and Company have screwed up, the doof still has fans. There's a lot more to Bush's stupidity than his inability to articulate. Nope, sorry... never said I was a fan. That's short for fanatic, those people that swoon and cry at rallies, and feel tingling in their legs, ya know? I think most people hope that Obama can do something *other* than give a stirring speech. We don't know yet, and what we *do* know doesn't really look that good. Meanwhile, Caroline is an empty shell with a storied last name. Ya know? What *we* know looks damn good. He's picked some top-drawer people to help in his administration, he's smart, he knows his way around the world, and he inspires people. Dubya's experience as a weak governor Texas did not prepare him for higher office, and he's been an absolute disaster. Clinton was prepared, as was his predecessor, GHWB. I'm sure Obama will do fine trying to clean up Bush's mess. As for Caroline Kennedy, I am sure she has the intellect to be a U.S. Senator and represent the interests of the country and her state. I'm not sure she is tough enough for the rough and tumble of New York politics. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 1:09*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 12:54*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". *It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. *Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know".- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, come now, you can't be trying to say that "consumption" came out instead of conservation because of a speech impedement........ |
Is there anyone here...
"John H" wrote in message ... ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Too much inbreeding. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 2:43*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 1:27 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On Jan 4, 12:54 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". *It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. *Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". It's just astonishing that after all these years and after everything Bush and Company have screwed up, the doof still has fans. There's a lot more to Bush's stupidity than his inability to articulate. Nope, sorry... never said I was a fan. *That's short for fanatic, those people that swoon and cry at rallies, and feel tingling in their legs, ya know? I think most people hope that Obama can do something *other* than give a stirring speech. *We don't know yet, and what we *do* know doesn't really look that good. Meanwhile, Caroline is an empty shell with a storied last name. *Ya know? What *we* know looks damn good. He's picked some top-drawer people to help in his administration, he's smart, he knows his way around the world, and he inspires people. Dubya's experience as a weak governor Texas did not prepare him for higher office, and he's been an absolute disaster. Clinton was prepared, as was his predecessor, GHWB. I disagree. BO was relatively unknown before his run, and the media in their love affair didn't do their job in uncovering anything about him. He came from one of the most corrupt political environment in the US, and had associations with some very dubious people. He ran on a theme of "Change!", but then filled his cabinet with the same-old croneys that have inhabited Washington for years. It's laughable to think that a little travel abroad has prepared him to be potus when it comes to foreign affairs. He's an unknown element right now. I suspect he's surrounded himself with those people because he realizes he doesn't know what he's doing, and that he'll need their help. That's OK, but it means it'll be the same old liberal agenda we've seen in the past, with a smooth talker at the helm. Heh, that takes me back 8 years... :-) I'm sure Obama will do fine trying to clean up Bush's mess. Gotta clean up the Dem's mess too. Boy, does he have his hands full. As for Caroline Kennedy, I am sure she has the intellect to be a U.S. Senator and represent the interests of the country and her state. I'm not sure she is tough enough for the rough and tumble of New York politics. I'm sure you, like everyone else, has no clue as to her "intellect". We've seen a glimpse, and it looks really bad, ya know? |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:51:17 -0500, John H
wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. And liberals complain about GWB being less than articulate. |
Is there anyone here...
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 4, 1:27 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On Jan 4, 12:54 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23 pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. She's stupid, too. Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know". It's just astonishing that after all these years and after everything Bush and Company have screwed up, the doof still has fans. There's a lot more to Bush's stupidity than his inability to articulate. Nope, sorry... never said I was a fan. That's short for fanatic, those people that swoon and cry at rallies, and feel tingling in their legs, ya know? I think most people hope that Obama can do something *other* than give a stirring speech. We don't know yet, and what we *do* know doesn't really look that good. Meanwhile, Caroline is an empty shell with a storied last name. Ya know? What *we* know looks damn good. He's picked some top-drawer people to help in his administration, he's smart, he knows his way around the world, and he inspires people. Dubya's experience as a weak governor Texas did not prepare him for higher office, and he's been an absolute disaster. Clinton was prepared, as was his predecessor, GHWB. I'm sure Obama will do fine trying to clean up Bush's mess. As for Caroline Kennedy, I am sure she has the intellect to be a U.S. Senator and represent the interests of the country and her state. I'm not sure she is tough enough for the rough and tumble of New York politics. Let me fix that last paragraph for you. As for Caroline Kennedy, I am sure she has the lack of intellect to be a U.S. Senator and represent the interests of the wealthy in her families circle of friends. I'm not sure she is tough enough for the rough and tumble of New York politics but will survive if she appeases the right people. Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 2:53*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:09*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:54*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:48*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?) liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it? Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements such as "We need an energy bill that encourages consumption." Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be "conservation". *It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech impediment, a tic. *Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya know, ya know".- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, come now, you can't be trying to say that "consumption" came out instead of conservation because of a speech impedement........ You don't really think that he *meant* to say "consumption", do you? With his obvious history of using the wrong word or phrase, creating the whole "bushism" thing? C'mon... |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:16:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote: On Jan 4, 11:58*am, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. Harry's calling you names. If you care to send him a card and ask him to stop, or give him a call, you can do so: Harry Krause 2015 Rosedale Lane Huntingtown, Maryland 20639 410 535-1594 (voice) 202 365-0164 (cell) |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:21:52 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 4, 12:16*pm, wrote: On Jan 4, 11:58*am, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. Kind of like this, huh? http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...dumbquotes.htm Not even close, Loogy. |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:20:22 -0500, Gene
wrote: Can you imagine the agony of the "fireside chats"????? "My..um...fellow...you know - Americans." |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:20:22 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:05:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:51:17 -0500, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. And liberals complain about GWB being less than articulate. Neither one of them, you know, could like, you know, string one or, you know, two words together, you know, in a coherent sentence where, like subject and, you know, verb agree, and, you know, there aren't any, like, weird or like made-up words. Good thing she, like, you know, doesn't want to be The Decider..... you know...... Can you imagine the agony of the "fireside chats"????? Uhm, I, uh, think, you know, you, uhm, may be, uhm, like, right, you know. |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57"
wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? |
Is there anyone here...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57" wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? I don't believe in stupidocracy, which is why I am happy Bush is almost through and Palin isn't starting. |
Is there anyone here...
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on many major media outlets. Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average. You missed my point, but the hell with it. Eisboch |
Is there anyone here...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on many major media outlets. Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average. You missed my point, but the hell with it. Eisboch Oh, well. |
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 1:59*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote: Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57" wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? All Canadians are our brothers. Well, except for those who live in Quebec. Or Nova Scotia. I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? Then again, it is Canada. Which is full of Canadians. :) Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat. Right Don? :) -- Happy Holidays and Merry Whatever It Is That ****es Liberals Off. |
Is there anyone here...
|
Is there anyone here...
On Jan 4, 6:41*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 1:59 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote: Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... My opinion of Palin's IQ has nothing to do with her ideology. There are plenty of smart conservatives on the national scene. Ok, as long as you understand that.. I have had my fill over the years with ones who only get their information from NPR, New York Lies, and Jon Stewart telling me conservatives are simply "uninformed"... or refering to half of America as "fly over states". Carry on...;) She isn't one of them. The world is not as simple as you would like it to be, Scotty. |
Is there anyone here...
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:16:17 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 4, 11:58 am, wrote: On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote: ...who can watch all of this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c I can take about 52 seconds. Thats all your limited brain can interpret. We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name. I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron representing my country. Harry's calling you names. If you care to send him a card and ask him to stop, or give him a call, you can do so: Harry Krause 2015 Rosedale Lane Huntingtown, Maryland 20639 410 535-1594 (voice) 202 365-0164 (cell) If anyone would care to write or call and advise John that he's invading another posters privacy... John Herring 6024 Mayfair Lane Alexandria, Virginia 22310 (703) 971-8743 |
Is there anyone here...
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57" wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? All Canadians are our brothers. Well, except for those who live in Quebec. Or Nova Scotia. I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? Then again, it is Canada. Which is full of Canadians. :) Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat. Right Don? :) -- They sure do and it's nice to see them appreciated by a man of your refined taste and exceptional judgement. ;-) |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers, fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's feet to the fire. |
Is there anyone here...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? At least somebody up there knows Latin. ;-) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com