Is there anyone here...
 

Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message


Harry Krause



If anyone would care to write or call and advise John that he's invading
another posters privacy...

John Herring
6024 Mayfair Lane
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
(703) 971-8743





Would that be the same John Herring who dislikes blacks and Latinos?

Is there anyone here...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...

All Canadians are our brothers.

Well, except for those who live in Quebec.

Or Nova Scotia.

I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

snip..

I thought you took Latin in school.
Nova Scotia was pretty big and important in colonial times...... until that
ungrateful rabble south of the border stole a chunk for Maine and it was
further divided when the United Empire Loyalists came north after your
revolution and formed New Brunswick.

Is there anyone here...
 

wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

At least somebody up there knows Latin. ;-)

You win the prize... one week cruise on my open boat. Must be taken between
Jan15-March 15.

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:55:13 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57"
wrote:

Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy".

Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference
does your opinion make ?

All Canadians are our brothers.

Well, except for those who live in Quebec.

Or Nova Scotia.

I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

Then again, it is Canada.

Which is full of Canadians. :)

Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat.

Right Don? :)

They sure do and it's nice to see them appreciated by a man of your refined
taste and exceptional judgement. ;-)

Damn straight.

The refined taste and exceptional judgement part that is. :)

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:01:48 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

At least somebody up there knows Latin. ;-)

Latin?

I figured they misspelled New Scotland. :)

--

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that
a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes
that it will also make better soup."

H.L. Mencken

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:59:18 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:



So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half
the country is afraid of...

While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to
point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution
by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true
democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a
more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers,
fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After
all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's
feet to the fire.

And it's a point that a lot of people don't understand - the
democratic republic vs democracy. The states are set up as popular
democracies and the Federal government is set up as a functional
republic.

Personally, I think the system works fine just as it is with one
exception. We need to break up the big states into smaller states.
There is way too much ordinate political power in the larger states
what overwhelms the smaller, more conservative states.

I think the field needs to be evened out a little to bring balance
back into our legislatures, Congress and the Presidency.


--

"Far better it is to dare mighty things,
to win glorious triumphs even though
checkered by failure, than to rank with
those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor
suffer much because they live in the gray
twilight that knows neither victory nor
defeat."

Theodore Roosevelt

Is there anyone here...
 

On Jan 4, 7:05*pm, HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

Harry Krause

If anyone would care to write or call and advise John that he's invading
another posters privacy...

John Herring
6024 Mayfair Lane
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
(703) 971-8743

Would that be the same John Herring *who dislikes blacks and Latinos?

Wouldn't do it Harry, I know OG Latino gangbangers and I am pretty
sure they wouldn't care for some grina susia using their brothers name
to pose on the net.. Seems I remember you calling them the s word a
couple of times too... My wife got a guy and his son great 40k a year
jobs with bennies just when they needed legit incomes. We are still
pretty good freinds, I can call and ask them if you like? They are
Latin Kings, but I bet they know some 13's in your area;)

Is there anyone here...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:59:18 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half
the country is afraid of...
While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to
point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution
by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true
democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a
more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers,
fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After
all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's
feet to the fire.

And it's a point that a lot of people don't understand - the
democratic republic vs democracy. The states are set up as popular
democracies and the Federal government is set up as a functional
republic.

Personally, I think the system works fine just as it is with one
exception. We need to break up the big states into smaller states.
There is way too much ordinate political power in the larger states
what overwhelms the smaller, more conservative states.

I think the field needs to be evened out a little to bring balance
back into our legislatures, Congress and the Presidency.


--

"Far better it is to dare mighty things,
to win glorious triumphs even though
checkered by failure, than to rank with
those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor
suffer much because they live in the gray
twilight that knows neither victory nor
defeat."

Theodore Roosevelt


The smaller states are Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. They are
progressive. Perhaps you mean the flyover states, like South Carolina,
Mississippi, and Idaho.

Is there anyone here...
 

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:44:44 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:59:18 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:



So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half
the country is afraid of...

While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to
point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution
by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true
democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a
more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers,
fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After
all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's
feet to the fire.

And it's a point that a lot of people don't understand - the
democratic republic vs democracy. The states are set up as popular
democracies and the Federal government is set up as a functional
republic.

Personally, I think the system works fine just as it is with one
exception. We need to break up the big states into smaller states.
There is way too much ordinate political power in the larger states
what overwhelms the smaller, more conservative states.

I think the field needs to be evened out a little to bring balance
back into our legislatures, Congress and the Presidency.

I think you'd have to break up the big cities, not the states.

Look at the population centers.

http://tinyurl.com/6engau

What gets me is that almost all of the large population centers have
Democrats as leaders. Yet the slums, squalor, poor, uneducated, and unwed
mother problems continue, year after year after year.

Some folks can't seem to learn.